|
1 The Argument for Interprofessional Education |
|
|
1 | (10) |
|
Complexity and Interprofessional Education in Healthcare |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
Developmental Growth Across Collaborative Modes |
|
|
5 | (3) |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
|
9 | (2) |
|
2 The Argument for the Patient-Centered Medical Home: Replicating Good Primary Care |
|
|
11 | (16) |
|
A Brief History of Primary Care |
|
|
11 | (2) |
|
Principles of Good Primary Care |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
Why Primary Care Works: Evidence for Efficiency, Quality, and Satisfaction |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
What Is the Patient-Centered Medical Home? |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
Where Are We with Primary Care? |
|
|
16 | (2) |
|
Making Sense of Mixed Evidence in the Patient-Centered Medical Home |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
Evidence from the Veterans Affairs Patient Aligned Care Team Transformation |
|
|
19 | (2) |
|
Where We Need to Go: Reinforcing Primary Care with the Patient-Centered Medical Home |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
Identifying Attractors that Facilitate Patient-Centered Medical Home Transformation |
|
|
21 | (3) |
|
|
24 | (3) |
|
3 A Brief Introduction to Systems |
|
|
27 | (14) |
|
Identifying and Understanding Systems |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
|
30 | (6) |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
|
32 | (2) |
|
Self-Organized Criticality |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
|
34 | (2) |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
Differences Between Types of Systems |
|
|
36 | (2) |
|
Consequences of Mixing Systems Up |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
|
39 | (2) |
|
4 The Training Clinic as a System |
|
|
41 | (12) |
|
What Does a Systems Approach Mean for the Training Clinic? |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
Continuity Clinic as Nested Complex Adaptive Systems |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
The Individual-Group Interface |
|
|
43 | (3) |
|
|
46 | (5) |
|
The Group-Environment Interface |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
5 SHED: Four Important Sub-theories That Help Us to "Bracket" |
|
|
53 | (12) |
|
|
53 | (3) |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
|
57 | (2) |
|
|
59 | (4) |
|
|
63 | (2) |
|
6 Implications for Design |
|
|
65 | (18) |
|
|
66 | (4) |
|
Designing for a Complicated System |
|
|
66 | (2) |
|
Designing for a Complex System |
|
|
68 | (2) |
|
|
70 | (10) |
|
Structural Design Considerations |
|
|
70 | (3) |
|
Process Design Considerations |
|
|
73 | (3) |
|
Cultural Design Considerations |
|
|
76 | (4) |
|
Implementation Science Considerations |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
|
80 | (3) |
|
7 Implications for Evaluation |
|
|
83 | (18) |
|
|
83 | (5) |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
|
85 | (2) |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
Specific Evaluation Methods |
|
|
88 | (6) |
|
|
88 | (2) |
|
|
90 | (2) |
|
Methods for Testing Variables |
|
|
92 | (2) |
|
Predictive Mathematical Modeling |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
Evaluation in Simple Systems |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
Evaluation in Complicated Systems |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
Evaluation in Complex Adaptive Systems |
|
|
95 | (2) |
|
Identifying Complex Systems |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
Signs of Critical State Transition |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
Creating an Evaluation Plan |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
|
98 | (3) |
|
8 Implications for Institutions |
|
|
101 | (14) |
|
Implications of Complex Systems |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
|
102 | (3) |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
|
106 | (5) |
|
|
106 | (2) |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
|
109 | (2) |
|
|
111 | (2) |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
Institutional Review Boards and Quality Councils |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
|
114 | (1) |
Index |
|
115 | |