Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Judicial Sales of Ships: A Comparative Study

  • Formaat - PDF+DRM
  • Hind: 122,88 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • See e-raamat on mõeldud ainult isiklikuks kasutamiseks. E-raamatuid ei saa tagastada.

DRM piirangud

  • Kopeerimine (copy/paste):

    ei ole lubatud

  • Printimine:

    ei ole lubatud

  • Kasutamine:

    Digitaalõiguste kaitse (DRM)
    Kirjastus on väljastanud selle e-raamatu krüpteeritud kujul, mis tähendab, et selle lugemiseks peate installeerima spetsiaalse tarkvara. Samuti peate looma endale  Adobe ID Rohkem infot siin. E-raamatut saab lugeda 1 kasutaja ning alla laadida kuni 6'de seadmesse (kõik autoriseeritud sama Adobe ID-ga).

    Vajalik tarkvara
    Mobiilsetes seadmetes (telefon või tahvelarvuti) lugemiseks peate installeerima selle tasuta rakenduse: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    PC või Mac seadmes lugemiseks peate installima Adobe Digital Editionsi (Seeon tasuta rakendus spetsiaalselt e-raamatute lugemiseks. Seda ei tohi segamini ajada Adober Reader'iga, mis tõenäoliselt on juba teie arvutisse installeeritud )

    Seda e-raamatut ei saa lugeda Amazon Kindle's. 

This work focuses on a specific aspect of the enforcement of maritime claims, namely judicial sales of ships, a procedure creditors typically resort to in the event of an irreversible default situation. A substantial part of the book approaches the topic from a comparative perspective, the goal being to assess the similarities and differences of the judicial sale procedure between three specific jurisdictions: Belgium, the Netherlands, and England & Wales. In this study, the comparison is used to further analyse the impacts of these differences on the effectiveness and reliability of the judicial sale procedure in each jurisdiction and also forms the basis for assessing the feasibility of harmonising judicial sale procedures and fostering their acceptance. Considering the international character typical of judicial sales of ships, conflict-of-law questions are very likely to arise during these procedures. Accordingly, the comparative study, where appropriate, is viewed against a p

rivate international law background.

Introduction.- Existing international and European legal framework for judicial sales of ships.- Comparative analysis: Belgium.- Comparative analysis: The Netherlands.- Comparative analysis: England and Wales.- Comparative analysis: Summary.- International legal framework for recognition of foreign judicial sales of ships.- Main conclusions.
1 Introduction
1(8)
A The Purpose
3(1)
B The Content
3(3)
C The Scope
6(2)
D The Perspective
8(1)
2 Existing International and European Legal Framework for Judicial Sales of Ships
9(22)
A International Framework
9(9)
I Brussels Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules of Law Relating to Maritime Liens and Mortgages 1926
9(2)
II Brussels Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules of Law Relating to Maritime Liens and Mortgages 1967
11(1)
III Geneva Convention on Maritime Liens and Mortgages 1993
12(2)
IV Arrest Convention 1952 & 1999
14(1)
V The Hague Service Convention 1965
15(3)
B European Framework
18(10)
I Brussels I Regulation and Brussels I Recast
18(7)
II Service Regulation
25(3)
C Conclusion
28(3)
3 Comparative Analysis: Belgium
31(36)
I Sources of Law
32(8)
1 Applicable International Conventions
32(1)
2 Domestic Legal Sources
33(3)
3 Court System
36(4)
II Requirements for a Judicial Sale
40(11)
1 Asset Constitutes a Ship
41(3)
2 Enforceable Title
44(3)
3 Ship Under Executory Arrest
47(4)
III Preparations for the Sale
51(2)
1 Appointment of Public Officer
51(1)
2 Conditions of Sale and Notification to Creditors and Claimants
51(1)
3 Disputes and Claims for Dissolution
52(1)
IV The Judicial Sale
53(2)
V Post-sale Phase
55(7)
1 Appointment of Liquidator
55(1)
2 Recognition and Ranking of Claims
56(4)
3 Effects of Belgian Judicial Sale
60(2)
VI Recognition of a Foreign Judicial Sale and Its Legal Effects
62(5)
1 Recognition of a Court Decision
63(3)
2 Recognition of In Rem Rights Created Abroad
66(1)
3 Recognition of Foreign Judicial Sale by Ship Registry
66(1)
4 Comparative Analysis: The Netherlands
67(32)
I Sources of Law
68(6)
1 Applicable International Conventions
68(1)
2 Domestic Legal Sources
68(2)
3 Court System
70(4)
II Requirements for a Judicial Sale
74(8)
1 Asset Constitutes a `Ship'
74(3)
2 Enforceable Title
77(2)
3 Ship Under Executory Arrest
79(3)
III Preparations for the Sale
82(2)
1 Notary or District Court
82(1)
2 Conditions of Sale and Advertisement of Sale
82(2)
3 Disputes and Claims for Dissolution
84(1)
IV The Judicial Sale
84(2)
V Post-sale Phase
86(6)
1 Appointment of Liquidator
86(1)
2 Recognition and Ranking of Claims
86(4)
3 Effects of Dutch Judicial Sale
90(2)
VI Recognition of a Foreign Judicial Sale and Its Legal Effects
92(7)
1 Recognition of Court Decision
93(3)
2 Recognition of In Rem Rights Created Abroad
96(1)
3 Recognition of Foreign Judicial Sale by Ship Registry
96(3)
5 Comparative Analysis: England and Wales
99(26)
I Sources of Law
99(6)
1 Applicable International Conventions
99(1)
2 Domestic Legal Sources
100(1)
3 Court System
101(4)
II Requirements for a Judicial Sale
105(2)
1 Asset Constitutes a `Ship'
105(2)
2 Ship Under Arrest
107(1)
III Preparations for the Sale
107(5)
1 Sale Order
110(1)
2 Admiralty Marshal
110(1)
3 Valuation
111(1)
4 Advertisement
111(1)
5 Dispute and Claim for Dissolution
112(1)
IV The Judicial Sale
112(1)
V Post-sale Phase
113(9)
1 Priority and Payout
114(5)
2 Effects of English Judicial Sale
119(3)
VI Recognition of a Foreign Judicial Sale and Its Legal Effects
122(3)
1 Recognition of Court Decision
122(1)
2 Recognition of In Rem Rights Created Abroad
123(1)
3 Recognition of Foreign Judicial Sale by Ship Registry
123(2)
6 Comparative Analysis: Summary
125(28)
I Enforceable Title vs. Sale Pendente Lite
126(5)
II Court System
131(1)
III Methods of Judicial Sale and Alternatives
132(9)
1 Court Auction vs. Sealed Bids
133(1)
2 Right of Higher Bid vs. Valuation
134(1)
3 Court-Approved Private Sale
135(6)
IV Payout
141(6)
1 The Domestic Order of Ranking
141(2)
2 Conflict-of-Law Approaches
143(4)
V Recognition
147(6)
1 Recognition of the Court Decision
147(3)
2 Recognition of In Rem Rights
150(1)
3 Shortcomings and Solution
150(3)
7 International Legal Framework for Recognition of Foreign Judicial Sales of Ships
153(22)
A The Need for an International Instrument
153(6)
B The Preparation of the Draft Convention on Judicial Sales of Ships
159(4)
I Preliminary Discussions and Questionnaire
159(2)
II First Draft Instrument
161(1)
III Second Draft Instrument
161(1)
IV Beijing Draft Instrument
162(1)
V Final Draft
163(1)
C The Material Aspects of the Final Draft
163(5)
I The Rationale Behind the Final Draft
163(1)
II The Scope of the Final Draft
164(1)
III The Modus Operandi of the Final Draft
165(3)
D Assessment of the Final Draft
168(3)
E Other Possible Solutions
171(3)
F Conclusion
174(1)
8 Main Conclusions
175(4)
Annex: Draft International Convention on Foreign Judicial Sales of Ships and Their Recognition (Beijing Draft) 179(10)
Table of Cases 189(6)
Table of Legislation 195(4)
Bibliography 199(4)
About the International Max Planck Research School for Maritime Affairs at the University of Hamburg 203