Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Juristic Concept of the Validity of Statutory Law: A Critique of Contemporary Legal Nonpositivism

  • Formaat: PDF+DRM
  • Ilmumisaeg: 24-Jun-2013
  • Kirjastus: Springer-Verlag Berlin and Heidelberg GmbH & Co. K
  • Keel: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9783642276880
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Formaat - PDF+DRM
  • Hind: 159,93 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • See e-raamat on mõeldud ainult isiklikuks kasutamiseks. E-raamatuid ei saa tagastada.
  • Formaat: PDF+DRM
  • Ilmumisaeg: 24-Jun-2013
  • Kirjastus: Springer-Verlag Berlin and Heidelberg GmbH & Co. K
  • Keel: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9783642276880
Teised raamatud teemal:

DRM piirangud

  • Kopeerimine (copy/paste):

    ei ole lubatud

  • Printimine:

    ei ole lubatud

  • Kasutamine:

    Digitaalõiguste kaitse (DRM)
    Kirjastus on väljastanud selle e-raamatu krüpteeritud kujul, mis tähendab, et selle lugemiseks peate installeerima spetsiaalse tarkvara. Samuti peate looma endale  Adobe ID Rohkem infot siin. E-raamatut saab lugeda 1 kasutaja ning alla laadida kuni 6'de seadmesse (kõik autoriseeritud sama Adobe ID-ga).

    Vajalik tarkvara
    Mobiilsetes seadmetes (telefon või tahvelarvuti) lugemiseks peate installeerima selle tasuta rakenduse: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    PC või Mac seadmes lugemiseks peate installima Adobe Digital Editionsi (Seeon tasuta rakendus spetsiaalselt e-raamatute lugemiseks. Seda ei tohi segamini ajada Adober Reader'iga, mis tõenäoliselt on juba teie arvutisse installeeritud )

    Seda e-raamatut ei saa lugeda Amazon Kindle's. 

This book presents the theory of the validity of legal norms, aimed at the practice of law, in particular the jurisdiction of the constitutional courts. The postpositivist concept of the validity of statutory law, grounded on a critical analysis of the basic theories of legal validity elaborated up to now, is introduced. In the first part of the book a contemporary German nonpositivist conception of law developed by Ralf Dreier and Robert Alexy is analysed in order to answer the question whether the juristic concept of legal validity should include moral standards or criteria. In the second part, a postpositivist concept of legal validity and an innovative model of validity discourse, based on the juristic presumption of the validity of legal norms, are proposed. The book is a work on analytical legal theory, written from a postpositivist, detached point of view.
1 Introduction
1(10)
Part I Critique of the Nonpositivist Conception of Law
2 The Nonpositivist Concept of Law
11(12)
2.1 Historical Background: The Role of "Radbruch's Formula"
11(3)
2.2 The Nonpositivist Conception of Ralf Dreier and Robert Alexy
14(4)
2.3 Some Remarks on the Construction of the Nonpositivist Definition of Law
18(2)
2.4 The Nonpositivist Conception of Law and the Concept of Legal Validity (Preliminary Remarks)
20(3)
3 Argumentation for the Nonpositivist Concept of Law
23(38)
3.1 The Methodological Framework of Nonpositivist Argumentation
23(6)
3.2 Ralf Dreier's Nonpositivist Argumentation
29(6)
3.3 Robert Alexy's Nonpositivist Argumentation
35(26)
3.3.1 Alexy's Analytical Argumentation
37(7)
3.3.2 Alexy's Normative Argumentation
44(7)
3.3.3 Revisions and Supplements in Begriff und Geltung des Rechts
51(10)
4 Critique of Nonpositivist Argumentation
61(132)
4.1 A Critique of the Nonpositivist Conception of Law
61(5)
4.2 Controversial Points of Nonpositivist Argumentation
66(2)
4.3 Lex iniustissima non est lex?
68(16)
4.3.1 Reconstruction of the Nonpositivist Standpoint
70(6)
4.3.2 Discussion of the Positivist Objection
76(8)
4.4 The Non-cognitivist Objection
84(7)
4.4.1 Is Alexy a Cognitivist?
86(3)
4.4.2 Preliminary Appraisal of the Non-cognitivist Objection
89(2)
4.5 Discursive Rehabilitation of Practical Reason?
91(26)
4.5.1 Logical Validity of the Transcendental-Pragmatic Argument
94(5)
4.5.2 Justification of the Premises of the Transcendental-Pragmatic Argument
99(12)
4.5.3 Conclusion of the Analysis of the Transcendental-Pragmatic Argument
111(1)
4.5.4 Additional Elements of the Justification of the Universal Validity of the Rules of Practical Discourse
111(3)
4.5.5 Is the Discursive Rehabilitation of Practical Reason Successful?
114(3)
4.6 Is the Nonpositivist Conception of Law Truly Nonpositivist?
117(21)
4.6.1 Arguments Justifying Suspicions of Crypto-Positivism
117(4)
4.6.2 Identification of the Opponent: Trennungsthese
121(5)
4.6.3 Hard Positivism, Soft Positivism and Nonpositivism
126(12)
4.7 The Problem of Justification of the Argument from Correctness
138(23)
4.7.1 Justification by Means of Performativer Widerspruch: Preliminary Remarks
139(3)
4.7.2 From Cogito, Ergo Sum to Claim to Correctness
142(9)
4.7.3 Justification of Richtigkeitsargument by Means of Recognition of "Performative Contradiction"
151(8)
4.7.4 Justification by Means of the Argument from Alternative
159(2)
4.8 Critique of Normative Argumentation
161(19)
4.8.1 Argument from Efficiency
162(7)
4.8.2 Argument from Candour
169(3)
4.8.3 The Problem of an "Enlightened" Morality
172(8)
4.9 Some Remarks About Nonpositivist Empirical Argumentation
180(8)
4.10 An Attempt at Evaluating the Nonpositivist Conception of Law
188(5)
5 The Nonpositivist Conception of Law and the Juristic Concept of the Validity of Law
193(24)
5.1 General Objections Against the Nonpositivist Definitions of Law
193(8)
5.2 Specific Objections from the Point of View of Legal Theory and Legal Practice
201(6)
5.3 The Need for an Axiologically Detached and Impartial Concept of the Validity of Law
207(10)
Part II Clarification of the Juristic Concept of the Validity of Statutory Law
6 Preliminaries to the Clarification of the Juristic Concept of the Validity of Statutory Law
217(30)
6.1 The Idea of Clarification
217(5)
6.2 Setting the Objectives of the Clarification of the Juristic Concept of the Validity of Statutory Law
222(4)
6.3 The Point of View and the Moral Aspect of the Legal Theory Statements
226(11)
6.4 The Referent of the Concept of Legal Validity
237(10)
7 Critique of the Jurisprudential Conceptions of Legal Validity
247(112)
7.1 On the Method of Clarificative Analysis
247(24)
7.1.1 On the Relativisation of the Expression: "A norm is valid"
252(8)
7.1.2 The Nature, Linguistic Stylisation and Structure of the Definition of the Juristic Concept of the Validity of Statutory Law
260(7)
7.1.3 Linguistic and Terminological Remarks
267(4)
7.2 Legal Validity Understood As the Membership of Norms in a Legal System
271(41)
7.2.1 Introductory Remarks
271(4)
7.2.2 Four Arguments
275(35)
7.2.3 Conclusions
310(2)
7.3 Legal Validity Understood as the Application of Norms
312(9)
7.4 Legal Validity Understood as the Applicability of Norms
321(13)
7.5 Legal Validity Understood in Terms of Observance or Efficacy
334(10)
7.6 Legal Validity Defined by Means of the Combination of Concepts
344(10)
7.6.1 Is the Nonpositivist Definition of Law a Clarification?
349(5)
7.7 En passant Comment
354(5)
8 The Postpositivist Concept of the Validity of Statutory Law
359(96)
8.1 Juristic Language, Types of Juristic Concepts and Modes of Their Creation
359(8)
8.2 Linguistic and Logical Characterisation of Utterances Concerning the Validity of Norms in Juristic Language
367(33)
8.2.1 Pragmatic Analysis of Juristic Utterances Concerning Validity
380(20)
8.3 Logical Redundancy of Purely Normative Utterances Concerning the Validity of Norms
400(22)
8.3.1 Normative Concept of Legal Validity
413(9)
8.4 The Legal Situation and the Pragmatic Approach to Law
422(11)
8.4.1 The Concept of Legal Situation
424(3)
8.4.2 The Pragmatic Conception of Legal Norm
427(6)
8.5 The Regulative Definition of the Juristic Concept of the Validity of Statutory Law
433(8)
8.6 The Overview of the Clarification of the Intension of the Juristic Concept of the Validity of Statutory Law
441(14)
9 Discourse of Validity and the Juristic Presumption of the Validity of Statutory Law Norms
455(82)
9.1 The Argumentative Approach to the Clarification of Extension of the Juristic Concept of the Validity of Statutory Law
455(4)
9.2 The Concept of Juristic Discourse
459(11)
9.3 Validity Discourse
470(11)
9.3.1 Types of Validity Discourse
471(2)
9.3.2 The Discourse of Justification and the Discourse of Application
473(3)
9.3.3 The Forms of Validity Discourse
476(2)
9.3.4 Possible Solutions for Validity Discourse
478(3)
9.4 The Structure of Validity Discourse Sensu Stricto
481(13)
9.4.1 The Juristic Presumption of the Validity of Statutory Law Norms
484(7)
9.4.2 The Rules of the Burden of Juristic Argumentation on Validity
491(3)
9.5 Methods of Validity Argumentation
494(27)
9.5.1 The Blockage of Presumption
496(2)
9.5.2 The Expiry and the Cancellation of Presumption
498(2)
9.5.3 The Rebuttal and the Destruction of Presumption by Means of Validity Arguments
500(3)
9.5.4 The Initial Circumvention of Presumption
503(1)
9.5.5 The Final Circumvention of Presumption
504(9)
9.5.6 The Suspension of Presumption
513(5)
9.5.7 The Revival of Presumption
518(3)
9.6 Remarks on Possible Classifications and Ways of Analysing Validity Arguments
521(8)
9.6.1 An Example of the Analysis of Validity Arguments: The Argument from "Radbruch's Formula"
526(3)
9.7 Juristic Presumption of the Validity of Statutory Law Norms vis-a-vis ignorantia iuris nocet and ignorantia legis neminem excusat Principles
529(4)
9.8 Some Remarks About the Applicability of the Proposed Model of Analysing Validity Discourse Sensu Stricto
533(4)
10 Epilogue
537(6)
References 543(44)
Index 587