Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Jury Under Fire: Myth, Controversy, and Reform

(Professor of Psychology and Courtesy Professor of Law, University of Nebraska - Lincoln), (Professor of Psychology, Director of Psychological Sciences Training, and Director of the Graduate Sub-Plan in Psychology and Law, University of)
  • Formaat - PDF+DRM
  • Hind: 67,12 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • See e-raamat on mõeldud ainult isiklikuks kasutamiseks. E-raamatuid ei saa tagastada.

DRM piirangud

  • Kopeerimine (copy/paste):

    ei ole lubatud

  • Printimine:

    ei ole lubatud

  • Kasutamine:

    Digitaalõiguste kaitse (DRM)
    Kirjastus on väljastanud selle e-raamatu krüpteeritud kujul, mis tähendab, et selle lugemiseks peate installeerima spetsiaalse tarkvara. Samuti peate looma endale  Adobe ID Rohkem infot siin. E-raamatut saab lugeda 1 kasutaja ning alla laadida kuni 6'de seadmesse (kõik autoriseeritud sama Adobe ID-ga).

    Vajalik tarkvara
    Mobiilsetes seadmetes (telefon või tahvelarvuti) lugemiseks peate installeerima selle tasuta rakenduse: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    PC või Mac seadmes lugemiseks peate installima Adobe Digital Editionsi (Seeon tasuta rakendus spetsiaalselt e-raamatute lugemiseks. Seda ei tohi segamini ajada Adober Reader'iga, mis tõenäoliselt on juba teie arvutisse installeeritud )

    Seda e-raamatut ei saa lugeda Amazon Kindle's. 

Although the jury is often referred to as one of the bulwarks of the American justice system, it regularly comes under attack. Recent changes to trial procedures, such as reducing jury size, allowing non-unanimous verdicts, and rewriting jury instructions in plain English, were designed to promote greater efficiency and adherence to the law. Other changes, such as capping damages and replacing jurors with judges as arbiters in complex trials, seem designed to restrict the role of laypeople in trial outcomes. Whether these innovations are implemented to facilitate the administration of justice or due to the belief that juries have excessive power and make irrational decisions, they raise a host of questions about their effects on juries' judgments and about justice. Policymakers sometimes make incorrect assumptions about jury behavior, with the result that some reform efforts have had surprising and unintended consequences.

The Jury Under Fire reviews a number of controversial beliefs about juries as well as the implications of these views for jury reform. It reviews up-to-date research on both criminal and civil juries that uses a variety of research methodologies: simulations, archival analyses, field studies, and juror interviews. Each chapter focuses on a mistaken assumption or myth about jurors or juries, critiques these myths, and then uses social science research findings to suggest appropriate reforms. Chapters discuss the experience of serving as a juror; jury selection and jury size; and the impact of evidence from eyewitnesses, experts, confessions, and juvenile offenders. The book also covers the process of deciding damages and punishment and the role of emotions in jurors' decision making, and it compares jurors' and judges' decisions. Finally, it reviews a broad range of efforts to reform the jury, including the most promising reforms that have a solid backing in research. Featuring highly visible trials to illustrate key points, The Jury Under Fire will interest researchers in psychology and the law, practicing attorneys, and policymakers, as well as students and trainees in these areas.

Arvustused

"Bornstein and Greene debunk more than a dozen popular myths-which often double as legal assumptions-about juries and how they function, interweaving descriptions of notable jury trials with scientific research testing whether these assumptions have merit. Engaging in style and thoroughly researched, this book is a 'must read' for anyone with an interest in jury decision making and is sure to become required reading in any class examining the jury."--Margaret Bull Kovera, PhD, Presidential Scholar and Professor of Psychology, John Jay College, City University of New York "This book is a welcome addition to the field. The authors use the most up-to-date findings to critically evaluate several myths about jury decision making. The chapters are presented in a fair and unbiased manner, making for an exceptionally clever and well-thought out book. This book adds something original to the field and will be a tremendous benefit for social scientists interested in juries and jury decision making."--Jeffrey Neuschatz, PhD, Professor and Chair, Department of Psychology, University of Alabama in Huntsville "The book skillfully interweaves cogent summaries of legal principles or important forensic issues, such as the psychology of eyewitness accuracy or false confession, with research into how juries grapple with these topics." --PsycCRITIQUES

Muu info

Winner of the 2019 APLS Book Award
Series Foreword ix
Acknowledgments xi
1 Introduction
1(16)
2 Avoid Jury Duty at All Costs
17(20)
3 Jury Selection Can Effectively Identify Biased Jurors
37(21)
4 6 = 12 and They Don't All Have to Agree
58(24)
5 Jurors Can Distinguish Accurate from Inaccurate Eyewitnesses
82(24)
6 Jurors Can Distinguish True from False Confessions
106(22)
7 Jurors Overvalue Expert Testimony
128(24)
8 Jurors Treat Juvenile Defendants Fairly
152(21)
9 Compensatory Damage Awards Are Excessive and Unpredictable
173(27)
10 Punitive Damage Awards Are Excessive and Unpredictable
200(22)
11 Jurors in Criminal Cases Can Fairly Punish Wrongdoers
222(20)
12 Jurors Can Control Their Emotions
242(29)
13 Just Let the Judge Do It
271(17)
14 Jurors Don't Need Any Special Help
288(21)
15 Conclusion
309(12)
References 321(64)
About the Authors 385(2)
Index 387
Brian H. Bornstein, PhD, is Professor of Psychology and Courtesy Professor of Law at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, where he serves as Director of the country's oldest Law and Psychology Program. His research interests include jury decision making, the reliability of eyewitness memory, and the application of decision-making principles to everyday judgment tasks.

Edie Greene, PhD, is Professor of Psychology, Director of Psychological Sciences Training, and Director of the Graduate Sub-Plan in Psychology and Law at the University of Colorado Colorado Springs. Her research focuses on legal decision making, beliefs about the causes and consequences of crime, eyewitness memory, and psychological issues in elder law.