Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Legitimacy, Power, and Inequalities in the Multistakeholder Internet Governance: Analyzing IANA Transition

,
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Formaat - PDF+DRM
  • Hind: 61,74 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • See e-raamat on mõeldud ainult isiklikuks kasutamiseks. E-raamatuid ei saa tagastada.
Legitimacy, Power, and Inequalities in the Multistakeholder Internet Governance: Analyzing IANA TransitionSuurem pilt
Teised raamatud teemal:

DRM piirangud

  • Kopeerimine (copy/paste):

    ei ole lubatud

  • Printimine:

    ei ole lubatud

  • Kasutamine:

    Digitaalõiguste kaitse (DRM)
    Kirjastus on väljastanud selle e-raamatu krüpteeritud kujul, mis tähendab, et selle lugemiseks peate installeerima spetsiaalse tarkvara. Samuti peate looma endale  Adobe ID Rohkem infot siin. E-raamatut saab lugeda 1 kasutaja ning alla laadida kuni 6'de seadmesse (kõik autoriseeritud sama Adobe ID-ga).

    Vajalik tarkvara
    Mobiilsetes seadmetes (telefon või tahvelarvuti) lugemiseks peate installeerima selle tasuta rakenduse: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    PC või Mac seadmes lugemiseks peate installima Adobe Digital Editionsi (Seeon tasuta rakendus spetsiaalselt e-raamatute lugemiseks. Seda ei tohi segamini ajada Adober Reader'iga, mis tõenäoliselt on juba teie arvutisse installeeritud )

    Seda e-raamatut ei saa lugeda Amazon Kindle's. 

This book aims to develop a critical understanding of multistakeholder governance in Internet Governance through an in-depth analysis of the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) transition, the process through which the U.S. Government transferred its traditional oversight role over the Domain Name System to the global Internet community. In the last few decades, multistakeholderism has become the dominant discourse in the Internet Governance field, mainly because of its promise to provide democratic legitimacy for transnational policymaking, although empirical research has highlighted disappointing performances of multistakeholder arrangements. This book contributes to the debate on multistakeholder governance by analyzing the IANA Transition process's normative legitimacy, broken down in the dimensions of input legitimacy (inclusiveness, balanced representation, and representativeness), throughput legitimacy (procedural and discursive quality), and output legitimacy (outcome and institutional effectiveness). Findings warn about the risk that multistakeholderism could result in a misleading rhetoric legitimizing existing power asymmetries.


1 Introduction: The IANA Transition and Internet Multistakeholder Governance
1(20)
1.1 Multistakeholderism in Internet Governance
3(6)
1.2 The Discursive Nature of Multistakeholderism: Performing Narrative or Misleading Rhetoric?
9(5)
1.3 Structure of the Book
14(7)
References
16(5)
2 Foundations, Pitfalls, and Assessment of Multistakeholder Governance
21(22)
2.1 Establishing Legitimate Authority for Transnational Governance: The Promise of Multistakeholderism
22(4)
2.2 Structural Pitfalls of Multistakeholder Governance
26(5)
2.3 A Framework to Assess the Legitimacy of Multistakeholder Initiatives
31(12)
References
38(5)
3 IANA Functions, ICANN, and the DNS War
43(20)
3.1 The Domain Name System and IANA Functions
43(3)
3.2 From Technical Governance to Governance by Contract
46(5)
3.3 The Internationalization of the DNS and the Multistakeholder Model
51(2)
3.4 The Evolution of ICANN Governance Structure
53(10)
References
58(5)
4 The Institutional Design of the IANA Transition Process
63(18)
4.1 The Preparatory Phase
64(6)
4.2 The Drafting of the IANA Stewardship Transition Proposal
70(6)
4.2.1 The Name Proposal
71(3)
4.2.2 The Number and Protocol Proposal
74(1)
4.2.3 The Assembled Proposal
75(1)
4.3 The Drafting of the Enhancing ICANN Accountability Recommendations
76(3)
4.4 Approval and Implementation by the ICANN Board and NTIA
79(2)
5 The Input Legitimacy of the IANA Transition Process
81(22)
5.1 Analyzing Input Legitimacy: Objectives, Data, and Methods
82(4)
5.2 Inclusiveness and Balanced Representation
86(4)
5.3 Representativeness, Revolving Doors, and Blurring Boundaries Among Stakeholders' Groups
90(6)
5.4 Power Relationship in the "Small World" of the IANA Transition Network
96(7)
References
100(3)
6 The Throughput Legitimacy of the IANA Transition Process
103(24)
6.1 The Procedural Quality of the IANA Transition
104(6)
6.2 Discursive Quality
110(17)
6.2.1 Theoretical and Methodological Notes
110(2)
6.2.2 The Discussion on Post-transition Oversight Arrangements
112(4)
6.2.3 Evaluating Deliberativeness and Discourse Balance
116(7)
References
123(4)
7 The Output Legitimacy of the IANA Transition Process
127(16)
7.1 Output Legitimacy in Constituent Policy-Making
127(2)
7.2 Institutional Effectiveness: The New ICANN Bylaws
129(6)
7.3 Outcome Effectiveness: A Still Contested DNS Regime
135(8)
7.3.1 National DNSs: The 2019 Russian Sovereign Internet Law
135(2)
7.3.2 The Territorial Jurisdiction of ICANN: The Case of the org TLD
137(4)
References
141(2)
8 Conclusion: The Misleading Rhetoric of Multistakeholderism
143
References
156
Nicola Palladino is a research fellow at the Department of Political and Social Studies, University of Salerno, Italy, where he works at the Internet & Communication Policy Center. He has taken part in several national and international research projects on Internet Governance, Internet Policy and Digital Constitutionalism processes.





Mauro Santaniello is a researcher at the Department of Political and Social Studies, University of Salerno, Italy, where he teaches Internet Governance and Digital Policy. He is a co-founder and vice director of the Internet & Communication Policy Center. He has led several research groups on Internet Governance and Policy.
Lisainfo e-raamatute kohta Lisainfo e-raamatute kohta
Püsilink: https://www.kriso.ee/db/97830305613142e.html
Märksõnad: