'Benoît Leclercq orchestrates an intellectually stimulating dialogue between two otherwise non-speaking parties, showcasing how combined insights of construction grammarians and relevance theorists can shed light on the fascinating mechanisms behind meaning creation. Leclercq's masterful discussion of two bodies of literature leads to a new and better understanding of coercion as a process driven by users seeking communicative benefits, of what happens when we recognize an idiom, and more generally of the proper place of pragmatics, conventional or not, in determining the sense of a word in context.' Bert Cappelle, Associate Professor, University of Lille 'This highly original book makes a very significant contribution to understanding of language and how it is used by combining two frameworks which are not usually seen as compatible. It does justice to both approaches, explaining key ideas developed within each and indicating how they developed. It also explores difficulties in combining the approaches and develops original and insightful proposals for overcoming these. It is a must-read for researchers in construction grammar and relevance theory, and for anyone interested in meaning and communication.' Billy Clark, Professor of English Language and Linguistics, Northumbria University 'This is an audacious book and a good read. Starting from a meticulous analysis of both seemingly uncontroversial and clearly incompatible concepts in two theories of cognition, Leclercq tells the story of an alternative model that will undoubtedly have a profound impact on pragmatic theory.' Ilse Depraetere, Professor of English Linguistics, University of Lille 'In this ambitious book, Benoît Leclercq offers a thought-provoking account of how Construction Grammar and Relevance Theory can be aligned and made useful for one another. For anyone interested in the role of pragmatics in constructional approaches to language, this is required reading.' Martin Hilpert, Professor of English Linguistics, Université de Neuchâtel