Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Manifestations of Coherence and Investor-State Arbitration

(National University of Singapore)
  • Formaat: PDF+DRM
  • Ilmumisaeg: 19-Jan-2023
  • Kirjastus: Cambridge University Press
  • Keel: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9781009183611
  • Formaat - PDF+DRM
  • Hind: 142,03 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • See e-raamat on mõeldud ainult isiklikuks kasutamiseks. E-raamatuid ei saa tagastada.
  • Formaat: PDF+DRM
  • Ilmumisaeg: 19-Jan-2023
  • Kirjastus: Cambridge University Press
  • Keel: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9781009183611

DRM piirangud

  • Kopeerimine (copy/paste):

    ei ole lubatud

  • Printimine:

    ei ole lubatud

  • Kasutamine:

    Digitaalõiguste kaitse (DRM)
    Kirjastus on väljastanud selle e-raamatu krüpteeritud kujul, mis tähendab, et selle lugemiseks peate installeerima spetsiaalse tarkvara. Samuti peate looma endale  Adobe ID Rohkem infot siin. E-raamatut saab lugeda 1 kasutaja ning alla laadida kuni 6'de seadmesse (kõik autoriseeritud sama Adobe ID-ga).

    Vajalik tarkvara
    Mobiilsetes seadmetes (telefon või tahvelarvuti) lugemiseks peate installeerima selle tasuta rakenduse: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    PC või Mac seadmes lugemiseks peate installima Adobe Digital Editionsi (Seeon tasuta rakendus spetsiaalselt e-raamatute lugemiseks. Seda ei tohi segamini ajada Adober Reader'iga, mis tõenäoliselt on juba teie arvutisse installeeritud )

    Seda e-raamatut ei saa lugeda Amazon Kindle's. 

"Coherence is highly valued in law. It is especially sought after in investor-state dispute settlement, where charges of incoherence in arbitral awards have long been raised by states and scholars. Yet coherence is a largely underexplored notion in international law. Often, coherence is treated as a mere ideal to strive towards or simply as a different way to describe the legal consistency of judicial outcomes. This book takes a different approach. It views coherence as an independent concept having two dimensions: a substantive and a methodological one. Both are critical for legal reasoning by international courts and tribunals, including by investor-state tribunals, and the book illustrates through several case studies some of the ways this conclusion is borne out in practice. A fuller understanding of coherence in international law has implications for the way we should understand the concept of law, the practice of legal reasoning, and judicial professional ethics"--

It is often thought that coherence is just an ideal, but it is also a way of doing law. This book explores this important concept within the context of international investment law and investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS), for students, scholars and legal practitioners.

Coherence is highly valued in law. It is especially sought after in investor-state dispute settlement, where charges of incoherence in arbitral awards have long been raised by states and scholars. Yet coherence is a largely underexplored notion in international law. Often, it is treated as a mere ideal to strive towards or simply as a different way to describe the legal consistency of judicial outcomes. This book takes a different approach. It sees coherence as an independent concept having two dimensions: a substantive and a methodological one. Both are critically important for legal reasoning by international courts and tribunals, including by investor-state tribunals, and the book illustrates through several case studies some of the ways this conclusion is borne out in practice. A fuller understanding of coherence in international law has implications for our understanding of the concept of law, the practice of legal reasoning, and judicial professional ethics.

Muu info

A novel framework for understanding the role and relevance of coherence in international dispute settlement and judicial reasoning.
Preface and Acknowledgements ix
Table of Cases
xi
Table of International Conventions
xxiii
Table of International Investment Agreements
xxiv
Table of Procedural Rules
xxvii
List of Abbreviations
xxviii
Introduction 1(10)
1.1 Three Reasons to Investigate Coherence
2(3)
1.2 Coherence, from the `Bottom-up'
5(3)
1.3 The Thesis in a Nutshell
8(1)
1.4 Outline of the Book's
Chapters
9(2)
1 The Content of Coherence
11(25)
1.1 Introduction
11(1)
1.2 A Primer on Concept Types
12(2)
1.3 Coherence and Related Concepts
14(16)
1.4 Coherence and the Dimensions of Substance and Method
30(3)
1.5 Conclusion: Expanding the Debate on Coherence
33(3)
2 Coherence and Legal Reasoning
36(26)
2.1 Introduction
36(1)
2.2 Two Points of Departure
37(6)
2.3 Is the Format of Legal Reasoning `Theoretical' or `Practical'?
43(10)
2.4 Coherence and the Format of Practical Legal Reasoning
53(9)
23 Conclusion
62(2)
3 Two Models for Coherence
64(31)
3.1 Introduction
64(1)
3.2 The Two Dimensions of Law
65(4)
3.3 Two Models for the Place of Coherence within Legal Reasoning
69(10)
3.4 Assessing the Two Models for Coherence
79(13)
3.5 Conclusion
92(3)
4 Coherence and the Interpretation of Treaties
95(51)
4.1 Introduction
95(2)
4.2 ISDS and the Problem of Interpretation and Justification under the VCLT Rule
97(6)
4.3 The Role for Coherence in the VCLT Rule
103(17)
4.4 Coherence as Contextual Harmonisation: Practical Examples
120(24)
4.5 Conclusion
144(2)
5 Coherence and Analogical Reasoning
146(61)
5.1 Introduction
146(1)
5.2 The Format of Analogical Inference
147(15)
5.3 Borrowing Meaning: The Defence of Necessity under Customary International Law
162(9)
5.4 Borrowing Guiding Principles: UPS v. Canada and the Principle of Equality of Competitive Opportunity under WTO Law
171(10)
5.5 Borrowing Methods: Proportionality and the Question of the Standard of Review
181(24)
5.6 Conclusion
205(2)
6 Coherence as Reflexivity
207(45)
6.1 Introduction
207(1)
6.2 Components of Reflexivity
208(19)
6.3 Reflexivity at Play: Dissecting Nationality Planning Jurisprudence
227(22)
6.4 Conclusion
249(3)
7 Coherence as Moral Responsibility
252(44)
7.1 Introduction
252(1)
7.2 The Challenge of Collective Reflexivity
253(7)
7.3 Towards Judicial Moral Responsibility in ISDS
260(7)
7.4 The Virtue of Faith
267(6)
7.5 The Virtue of Humility
273(5)
7.6 The Virtue of Acquiescence
278(7)
7.7 The Virtues of Integrity and Candour
285(8)
7.8 Conclusion
293(3)
Coda: Coherence and Investor-State Dispute Settlement Reform
296(7)
C.1 ISDS Reform at UNCITRAL
296(2)
C.2 An Assessment of the ISDS Reform Debate through the Prism of Coherence
298(5)
Epilogue 303(5)
Bibliography 308(16)
Index 324
Charalampos Giannakopoulos is a Senior Research Fellow in the Centre for International Law, National University of Singapore. He has previously been a Visiting Research Scholar at the University of Michigan Law School and a legal consultant at UNCTAD (Investment Agreements Section).