Preface and Acknowledgements |
|
ix | |
|
|
xi | |
|
Table of International Conventions |
|
|
xxiii | |
|
Table of International Investment Agreements |
|
|
xxiv | |
|
Table of Procedural Rules |
|
|
xxvii | |
|
|
xxviii | |
Introduction |
|
1 | (10) |
|
1.1 Three Reasons to Investigate Coherence |
|
|
2 | (3) |
|
1.2 Coherence, from the `Bottom-up' |
|
|
5 | (3) |
|
1.3 The Thesis in a Nutshell |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
1.4 Outline of the Book's Chapters |
|
|
9 | (2) |
|
1 The Content of Coherence |
|
|
11 | (25) |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
1.2 A Primer on Concept Types |
|
|
12 | (2) |
|
1.3 Coherence and Related Concepts |
|
|
14 | (16) |
|
1.4 Coherence and the Dimensions of Substance and Method |
|
|
30 | (3) |
|
1.5 Conclusion: Expanding the Debate on Coherence |
|
|
33 | (3) |
|
2 Coherence and Legal Reasoning |
|
|
36 | (26) |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
2.2 Two Points of Departure |
|
|
37 | (6) |
|
2.3 Is the Format of Legal Reasoning `Theoretical' or `Practical'? |
|
|
43 | (10) |
|
2.4 Coherence and the Format of Practical Legal Reasoning |
|
|
53 | (9) |
|
|
62 | (2) |
|
3 Two Models for Coherence |
|
|
64 | (31) |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
3.2 The Two Dimensions of Law |
|
|
65 | (4) |
|
3.3 Two Models for the Place of Coherence within Legal Reasoning |
|
|
69 | (10) |
|
3.4 Assessing the Two Models for Coherence |
|
|
79 | (13) |
|
|
92 | (3) |
|
4 Coherence and the Interpretation of Treaties |
|
|
95 | (51) |
|
|
95 | (2) |
|
4.2 ISDS and the Problem of Interpretation and Justification under the VCLT Rule |
|
|
97 | (6) |
|
4.3 The Role for Coherence in the VCLT Rule |
|
|
103 | (17) |
|
4.4 Coherence as Contextual Harmonisation: Practical Examples |
|
|
120 | (24) |
|
|
144 | (2) |
|
5 Coherence and Analogical Reasoning |
|
|
146 | (61) |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
5.2 The Format of Analogical Inference |
|
|
147 | (15) |
|
5.3 Borrowing Meaning: The Defence of Necessity under Customary International Law |
|
|
162 | (9) |
|
5.4 Borrowing Guiding Principles: UPS v. Canada and the Principle of Equality of Competitive Opportunity under WTO Law |
|
|
171 | (10) |
|
5.5 Borrowing Methods: Proportionality and the Question of the Standard of Review |
|
|
181 | (24) |
|
|
205 | (2) |
|
6 Coherence as Reflexivity |
|
|
207 | (45) |
|
|
207 | (1) |
|
6.2 Components of Reflexivity |
|
|
208 | (19) |
|
6.3 Reflexivity at Play: Dissecting Nationality Planning Jurisprudence |
|
|
227 | (22) |
|
|
249 | (3) |
|
7 Coherence as Moral Responsibility |
|
|
252 | (44) |
|
|
252 | (1) |
|
7.2 The Challenge of Collective Reflexivity |
|
|
253 | (7) |
|
7.3 Towards Judicial Moral Responsibility in ISDS |
|
|
260 | (7) |
|
|
267 | (6) |
|
7.5 The Virtue of Humility |
|
|
273 | (5) |
|
7.6 The Virtue of Acquiescence |
|
|
278 | (7) |
|
7.7 The Virtues of Integrity and Candour |
|
|
285 | (8) |
|
|
293 | (3) |
|
Coda: Coherence and Investor-State Dispute Settlement Reform |
|
|
296 | (7) |
|
C.1 ISDS Reform at UNCITRAL |
|
|
296 | (2) |
|
C.2 An Assessment of the ISDS Reform Debate through the Prism of Coherence |
|
|
298 | (5) |
Epilogue |
|
303 | (5) |
Bibliography |
|
308 | (16) |
Index |
|
324 | |