Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Marriage and Same-Sex Unions: A Debate

Edited by , Edited by , Edited by , Edited by
  • Formaat: 408 pages
  • Ilmumisaeg: 30-Apr-2003
  • Kirjastus: Praeger Publishers Inc
  • Keel: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780313016226
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Formaat - PDF+DRM
  • Hind: 30,41 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • See e-raamat on mõeldud ainult isiklikuks kasutamiseks. E-raamatuid ei saa tagastada.
  • Formaat: 408 pages
  • Ilmumisaeg: 30-Apr-2003
  • Kirjastus: Praeger Publishers Inc
  • Keel: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780313016226
Teised raamatud teemal:

DRM piirangud

  • Kopeerimine (copy/paste):

    ei ole lubatud

  • Printimine:

    ei ole lubatud

  • Kasutamine:

    Digitaalõiguste kaitse (DRM)
    Kirjastus on väljastanud selle e-raamatu krüpteeritud kujul, mis tähendab, et selle lugemiseks peate installeerima spetsiaalse tarkvara. Samuti peate looma endale  Adobe ID Rohkem infot siin. E-raamatut saab lugeda 1 kasutaja ning alla laadida kuni 6'de seadmesse (kõik autoriseeritud sama Adobe ID-ga).

    Vajalik tarkvara
    Mobiilsetes seadmetes (telefon või tahvelarvuti) lugemiseks peate installeerima selle tasuta rakenduse: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    PC või Mac seadmes lugemiseks peate installima Adobe Digital Editionsi (Seeon tasuta rakendus spetsiaalselt e-raamatute lugemiseks. Seda ei tohi segamini ajada Adober Reader'iga, mis tõenäoliselt on juba teie arvutisse installeeritud )

    Seda e-raamatut ei saa lugeda Amazon Kindle's. 

This book exemplifies the high quality of thoughtful discussion and debate that is possible on the issue of same-sex marriage. Authors are paired to address and respond to a particular topic, one in favor of state recognition of same-sex relationships, and one in favor of limiting state recognition to those relationships that have been traditionally recognized as marriages.

Proposals to legalize same-sex marriage evoke strong response from those on both sides of the debate. Much has been written about the legal policy issues over the legal recognition of same-sex unions in the United States, yet there has been little dialogue and exchange between participants in the debate. This book attempts to open that dialogue, and to exemplify the high quality of thoughtful discussion and debate that is possible. Authors are paired to address and respond to a particular topic, one in favor of state recognition of same-sex relationships and one in favor of limiting state recognition to those relationships that have been traditionally recognized as marriages.

This ideal introduction is designed to lead the reader through the relevant issues, progressing from the general to the particular. Debates are contextualized, offering comparative, historical, and family-policy perspectives, asking fundamental questions such as what is the purpose of a family, and what interests, if any, that state has in promoting a particular type of family over others. Issues of jurisprudence and political philosophy are examined, addressing the public benefits of marriage and equal treatment before the law, among other items. The constitutionality of same-sex marriage or domestic partnership policies is explored. Finally, this book covers the broad implications when statessuch as Vermontlegally recognize same-sex unions, and the impact of international recognition of same-sex marriage rights.

Arvustused

Deploring big judicial steps that broaden protections and rights for diverse, even same-sex relationships, conservatives sharpen the contrasts between relationships and marriage. They hope that the Defense of Marriage Act (1996) and sundry state laws will slow (maybe reverse) current trends, but they see same-sex marriages on the horizon. Advocates of change, arguing equality and celebrating committed relationships, underscore the states' custom of acknowledging other states' marriages, even ones locally forbidden (for example, on age or consanguinity grounds). Do Canada, Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands, and Vermont predict the future? This debate wonderfully articulates what is at stake.Highly recommended. All levels and collections. * Choice * [ t]he editors of Marriage and Same-Sex Unions: A Debate have laid the groundwork necessary to achieve their purpose of educating a broader audience on the intricacies of the controversy.[ w]ritten and published before Lawrence v. Texas (2003), which sparked the call for a Federal Marriage Amendment that would limit marriage to heterosexual relationships. Given these recent developments and the profile that such an issue is likely to receive in our political science and constitutional law classes, understanding both sides of the gay marriage argument is ever more important. This book can provide the instructor with an understanding of the significant legal arguments on both sides of the gay marriage question. * The Law and Politics Book Review * New and previously published writings on the question of whether to extend state recognition to same-sex unions. * The Chronicle of Higher Education *

Muu info

This in-depth introduction to the pivotal arguments for and against legalizing same-sex marriage attempts to exemplify the high quality of thoughtful discussion that is possible.
Preface xi
Part I Marriage and Same-Sex Unions in Comparative, Historical, and Family Policy Perspectives
1(94)
Chapter 1
All Together Now
3(10)
Evan Wolfson
A Reality Waiting to Happen: A Response to Evan Wolfson
10(3)
Maggie Gallagher
Normal Marriage: Two Views
13(20)
Maggie Gallagher
Enough Marriage to Share: A Response to Maggie Gallagher
25(8)
Evan Wolfson
Chapter 2
The State Interests in Recognizing Same-Sex Marriage
33(14)
Mark Strasser
Reply to Professor Mark Strasser
43(4)
John Witte, Jr.
The Tradition of Traditional Marriage
47(18)
John Witte, Jr.
The Logical Case for Same-Sex Marriage: A Response to Professor John Witte, Jr.
60(5)
Mark Strasser
Chapter 3
On Legal Recognition for Same-Sex Partners
65(16)
Arthur S. Leonard
Reply to Arthur S. Leonard
78(3)
Lynne Marie Kohm
Marriage by Design
81(14)
Lynne Marie Kohm
Reply to ``Marriage by Design,''
91(4)
Arthur S. Leonard
Part II Issues of Jurisprudence and Political Philosophy in the Debate on Marriage and Same-Sex Unions
95(112)
Chapter 4
Homosexuality and the Conservative Mind
97(22)
Stephen Macedo
Image, Analysis, and the Nature of Relationships
115(4)
Lynn D. Wardle
Neutrality, Equality, and ``Same-Sex Marriage,''
119(18)
Robert P. George
On Justice, Exclusion, and Equal Treatment: A Response to Professor Robert P. George
133(4)
Mark Strasser
Chapter 5
Marriage, Same-Gender Relationships, and Human Needs and Capabilities
137(15)
Carlos A. Ball
The Illusory Public Benefits of Same-Sex Encounters: A Response to Professor Carlos A. Ball
148(4)
Teresa Stanton Collett
Should Marriage Be Privileged? The State's Interest in Childbearing Unions
152(15)
Teresa Stanton Collett
One Last Hope: A Response to Professor Teresa Stanton Collett
162(5)
Carlos A. Ball
Chapter 6
The Same-Sex-Marriage Debate and Three Conceptions of Equality
167(23)
William N. Eskridge, Jr.
Beyond Equality
186(4)
Lynn D. Wardle
Marriage, Relationships, Same-Sex Unions, and the Right of Intimate Association
190(17)
Lynn D. Wardle
Terms of Endearment
203(4)
William N. Eskridge, Jr.
Part III U.S. Constitutional Law Issues Concerning Same-Sex Marriage or Domestic Partnership
207(74)
Chapter 7
Discrimination Against Gays Is Sex Discrimination
209(18)
Andrew Koppelman
Reply to ``Discrimination Against Gays Is Sex Discrimination,''
221(6)
Richard G. Wilkins
The Constitutionality of Legal Preferences for Heterosexual Marriage
227(18)
Richard G. Wilkins
Reply to ``The Constitutionality of Legal Preferences for Heterosexual Marriage,''
241(4)
Andrew Koppelman
Chapter 8
Civil Marriage and the First Amendment
245(19)
David B. Cruz
Reflections on the Emperor's Clothes: A Response to Professor David B. Cruz's Theory on Marriage and the First Amendment
261(3)
Richard F. Duncan
Hardwick's Landmark Status, Romer's Narrowness, and the Preservation of Marriage
264(17)
Richard F. Duncan
Social and Judicial ``Just-So'' Stories
276(5)
David B. Cruz
Part IV Issues of State Constitutional Law and International Law Concerning Marriage and Same-Sex Unions
281(104)
Chapter 9
Vermont Civil Unions: A Success Story
283(14)
Greg Johnson
Are Civil Unions Mandated by Constitutional Law? A Response to Greg Johnson
294(3)
William C. Duncan
Imposing the Same-Sex-Marriage Template on State Constitutional Law: The Implications for Marriage, Constitutional Theory, and Democracy
297(16)
William C. Duncan
Reply to William C. Duncan
309(4)
Greg Johnson
Chapter 10
Applying the Usual Marriage-Validation Rule to Marriages of Same-Sex Couples
313(18)
Barbara J. Cox
Reply to Professor Barbara J. Cox
327(4)
Patrick J. Borchers
Interstate Recognition of Nontraditional Marriages
331(18)
Patrick J. Borchers
Reply to Dean Patrick J. Borchers's Essay
343(6)
Barbara J. Cox
Chapter 11
The Inexorable Momentum Toward National and International Recognition of Same-Sex Relationships: An International, Comparative, Historical, and Cross-Cultural Perspective
349(18)
James D. Wilets
Reply to Professor James D. Wilets's Essay
361(6)
Robert John Araujo
Marriage, Relationship, and International Law: The Incoherence of the Argument for Same-Sex Marriage
367(18)
Robert John Araujo
Reply to Father Robert John Araujo's ``Marriage, Relationship, and International Law: The Incoherence of the Argument for Same-Sex Marriage,''
380(5)
James D. Wilets
Index of Cases 385(2)
Index 387(6)
About the Editors and Contributors 393
LYNN D. WARDLE is Professor of Law at the J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University. He is co-editor of Revitalizing the Institution of Marriage for the Twenty-First Century (Praeger, 2002).

MARK STRASSER is the Trustees Professor of Law at Capital University Law School in Columbus, Ohio. He is the author of On Same-Sex Marriage, Civil Unions, and the Rule of Law: Constitutional Interpretation at the Crossroads (Praeger, 2002).

WILLIAM C. DUNCAN is the Assistant Director of the Marriage Law Project, based at the Columbus School of Law of the Catholic University of America.

DAVID ORGON COOLIDGE was Director of the Marriage Law Project at the Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America, until his death in 2002. He is co-editor of Revitalizing the Institution of Marriage for the Twenty-First Century (Praeger, 2002).