|
|
xvii | |
|
1 Metaheuristic Algorithms in Modeling and Optimization |
|
|
1 | (24) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
1.2 Metaheuristic Algorithms |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
1.2.1 Characteristics of Metaheuristics |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
1.2.2 No Free Lunch Theorems |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
1.3 Metaheuristic Algorithms in Modeling |
|
|
3 | (7) |
|
1.3.1 Artificial Neural Networks |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
1.3.2 Genetic Programming |
|
|
5 | (3) |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
1.3.4 Support Vector Machines |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
1.4 Metaheuristic Algorithms in Optimization |
|
|
10 | (8) |
|
1.4.1 Evolutionary Algorithms |
|
|
11 | (2) |
|
1.4.2 Swarm-Intelligence-Based Algorithms |
|
|
13 | (5) |
|
1.5 Challenges in Metaheuristics |
|
|
18 | (7) |
|
|
18 | (7) |
|
2 A Review on Traditional and Modern Structural Optimization: Problems and Techniques |
|
|
25 | (24) |
|
|
|
|
2.1 Optimization Problems |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
2.2 Optimization Techniques |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
|
26 | (4) |
|
2.4 Structural Optimization |
|
|
30 | (5) |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
2.4.2 Major Advances in Structural Optimization |
|
|
30 | (2) |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
2.4.4 Reliability-Based Optimization Approach |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
2.5 Metaheuristic Optimization Techniques |
|
|
35 | (14) |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
2.5.2 Simulated Annealing |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
2.5.4 Ant Colony Optimization |
|
|
37 | (2) |
|
2.5.5 Particle Swarm Optimization |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
2.5.7 Big Bang-Big Crunch |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
2.5.10 Other Metaheuristics |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
|
41 | (8) |
|
3 Particle Swarm Optimization in Civil Infrastructure Systems: State-of-the-Art Review |
|
|
49 | (28) |
|
Kasthurirangan Gopalakrishnan |
|
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
3.2 Particle Swarm Optimization |
|
|
50 | (2) |
|
3.3 Structural Engineering |
|
|
52 | (2) |
|
3.3.1 Shape and Size Optimization Problems in Structural Design |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
3.3.2 Structural Condition Assessment and Health Monitoring |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
3.3.3 Structural Material Characterization and Modeling |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
3.3.4 Other PSO Applications in Structural Engineering |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
3.4 Transportation and Traffic Engineering |
|
|
54 | (3) |
|
3.4.1 Transportation Network Design |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
3.4.2 Traffic Flow Forecasting |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
3.4.4 Traffic Accident Forecasting |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
3.4.5 Vehicle Routing Problem |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
3.4.6 Other PSO Application in Transportation and Traffic Engineering |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
3.5 Hydraulics and Hydrology |
|
|
57 | (3) |
|
3.5.1 River Stage Prediction |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
3.5.2 Design Optimization of Water/Wastewater Distribution Networks |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
3.5.3 Reservoir Operation Problems |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
3.5.4 Parameter Estimation/Calibration of Hydrological Models |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
3.5.5 Other PSO Applications in Hydraulics and Hydrology |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
3.6 Construction Engineering |
|
|
60 | (2) |
|
3.6.1 Construction Planning and Management |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
3.6.2 Construction Litigation |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
3.6.3 Construction Cost Estimation and Prediction |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
3.6.4 Other PSO Applications in Construction Engineering |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
3.7 Geotechnical Engineering |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
3.7.1 Inverse Parameter Identification and Geotechnical Model Calibration |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
3.7.2 Slope Stability Analysis |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
3.9 PSO Applications in Other Civil Engineering Fields |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
|
63 | (14) |
|
|
64 | (13) |
|
Part One Structural Design |
|
|
77 | (218) |
|
4 Evolution Strategies-Based Metaheuristics in Structural Design Optimization |
|
|
79 | (24) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
|
80 | (2) |
|
4.3 The Structural Optimization Problem |
|
|
82 | (3) |
|
4.3.1 Sizing Optimization |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
4.3.3 Topology Optimization |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
|
85 | (3) |
|
4.4.1 Single-Objective Structural Optimization |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
4.4.2 Multiobjective Structural Optimization |
|
|
86 | (2) |
|
|
88 | (6) |
|
4.5.1 Solving the Single-Objective Optimization Problems |
|
|
88 | (5) |
|
4.5.2 Solving the Multiobjective Optimization Problems |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
4.6 39-Bar Truss---Test Example |
|
|
94 | (3) |
|
|
97 | (6) |
|
|
99 | (4) |
|
5 Multidisciplinary Design and Optimization Methods |
|
|
103 | (26) |
|
|
|
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
5.2 Coupled Multidisciplinary System |
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
5.3 Classifications of MDO Formulations |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
5.4 Single-Level Optimization |
|
|
106 | (2) |
|
5.4.1 Multiple-Discipline Feasible |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
5.4.3 Individual-Discipline Feasible |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
5.4.4 Comparative Characteristics of Single-Level Optimization |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
5.5 Multilevel Optimization |
|
|
108 | (2) |
|
5.5.1 Concurrent Subspace Optimization |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
5.5.2 Bilevel Integrated System Synthesis |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
5.5.3 Collaborative Optimization |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
5.6 Optimization Algorithms |
|
|
110 | (3) |
|
5.6.1 Direct Search Methods |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
5.6.2 Gradient-Based Optimization Techniques |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
5.6.3 Metaheuristic Optimization Techniques |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
5.7 High-Fidelity MDO Using Metaheuristic Algorithms |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
|
114 | (10) |
|
5.8.1 Conventional Optimization Problem Formulation |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
5.8.3 Discipline-Level Optimization |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
5.8.4 Implementation of Multi-Fidelity Modeling Methodology in CO |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
5.8.5 System-Level Optimization Using MLSM |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
5.8.6 Evaluation of Predictive Capabilities of the Metamodels |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
5.8.7 Optimization Algorithms |
|
|
122 | (2) |
|
|
124 | (5) |
|
|
124 | (5) |
|
6 Cost Optimization of Column Layout Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings |
|
|
129 | (18) |
|
|
|
|
|
129 | (2) |
|
6.2 Statement of the Problem |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
6.3 Formulation in a New Space |
|
|
132 | (6) |
|
|
132 | (3) |
|
|
135 | (2) |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
6.4 The Optimization Problem |
|
|
138 | (2) |
|
6.5 ACO Algorithm for Column Layout Optimization |
|
|
140 | (5) |
|
|
143 | (2) |
|
|
145 | (2) |
|
|
145 | (2) |
|
7 Layout Design of Beam---Slab Floors by a Genetic Algorithm |
|
|
147 | (26) |
|
|
|
|
147 | (4) |
|
7.1.1 Heuristic Versus Algorithmic Design Tasks |
|
|
147 | (3) |
|
7.1.2 Conversion of Heuristic to Algorithmic Tasks |
|
|
150 | (1) |
|
7.1.3 Beam---Slab Layout Design as an Optimization Problem |
|
|
150 | (1) |
|
7.2 A Representation of Beam---Slab Layouts |
|
|
151 | (8) |
|
7.2.1 A Representation of Beam Locations |
|
|
152 | (3) |
|
7.2.2 Elimination of Invalid Beams |
|
|
155 | (4) |
|
7.3 A Representative Optimization Problem |
|
|
159 | (3) |
|
7.4 A GA for Beam-Slab Layout Design |
|
|
162 | (3) |
|
7.4.1 Problem Formulation for a GA |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
7.4.2 Adaptive Penalty and Elitism |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
|
165 | (3) |
|
|
168 | (5) |
|
|
170 | (3) |
|
8 Optimum Design of Skeletal Structures via Big Bang---Big Crunch Algorithm |
|
|
173 | (34) |
|
|
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
8.2 Statement of the Optimization Design Problem |
|
|
174 | (3) |
|
8.2.1 Constraint Conditions for Truss Structures |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
8.2.2 Constraint Conditions for Steel Frames |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
8.2.3 Constraints Handling Approach |
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
8.3 Review of the Utilized Methods |
|
|
177 | (4) |
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
8.3.2 Particle Swarm Optimization |
|
|
178 | (2) |
|
8.3.3 Sub-Optimization Mechanism |
|
|
180 | (1) |
|
|
181 | (4) |
|
8.4.1 A Continuous Algorithm |
|
|
181 | (2) |
|
8.4.2 A Discrete Algorithm |
|
|
183 | (2) |
|
|
185 | (14) |
|
8.5.1 A Square on Diagonal Double-Layer Grid |
|
|
186 | (2) |
|
8.5.2 A 26-Story-Tower Spatial Truss |
|
|
188 | (2) |
|
8.5.3 A 354-Bar Braced Dome Truss |
|
|
190 | (3) |
|
8.5.4 A 582-Bar Tower Truss |
|
|
193 | (2) |
|
8.5.5 A 3-Bay 15-Story Frame |
|
|
195 | (2) |
|
8.5.6 A 3-Bay 24-Story Frame |
|
|
197 | (2) |
|
|
199 | (8) |
|
|
202 | (5) |
|
9 Truss Weight Minimization Using Hybrid Harmony Search and Big Bang---Big Crunch Algorithms |
|
|
207 | (34) |
|
|
|
|
207 | (2) |
|
9.2 Statement of the Weight Minimization Problem for a Truss Structure |
|
|
209 | (1) |
|
|
210 | (7) |
|
9.3.1 Generation, Acceptance/Rejection, and Adjustment of a New Harmony |
|
|
212 | (3) |
|
9.3.2 Evaluation of the New Trial Design |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
9.3.3 One-Dimensional SA-Type Probabilistic Search |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
9.3.4 Update of the Harmony Memory |
|
|
217 | (1) |
|
9.3.5 Termination Criterion |
|
|
217 | (1) |
|
|
217 | (5) |
|
9.4.1 Generation of the Initial Population and Determination of the Center of Mass |
|
|
219 | (1) |
|
9.4.2 Evaluation of the Characteristics of the Center of Mass |
|
|
219 | (1) |
|
9.4.3 Perturbation of Design Variables |
|
|
220 | (1) |
|
9.4.4 Evaluate the Quality of the New Trial Design, Eventually Use Improvement Routines, and Finally Perform a New Explosion |
|
|
221 | (1) |
|
|
222 | (2) |
|
9.6 Description of Test Problems |
|
|
224 | (4) |
|
9.6.1 Planar 200-Bar Truss Structure Subject to Five Independent Loading Conditions |
|
|
225 | (1) |
|
9.6.2 Spatial 3586-Bar Truss Tower |
|
|
226 | (2) |
|
9.6.3 Implementation Details |
|
|
228 | (1) |
|
9.7 Results of Sensitivity Analysis |
|
|
228 | (4) |
|
9.8 Results of the Large-Scale Optimization Problem |
|
|
232 | (3) |
|
9.9 Summary and Conclusions |
|
|
235 | (6) |
|
|
237 | (4) |
|
10 Graph Theory in Evolutionary Truss Design Optimization |
|
|
241 | (28) |
|
|
|
|
241 | (1) |
|
|
242 | (6) |
|
10.2.1 Equilibrium Equations |
|
|
242 | (2) |
|
10.2.2 Formulation of the Optimization Problem |
|
|
244 | (2) |
|
10.2.3 Optimization Methods |
|
|
246 | (2) |
|
|
248 | (3) |
|
|
248 | (1) |
|
10.3.2 Finite Element Representation |
|
|
249 | (1) |
|
10.3.3 Weighted Adjacency Matrix |
|
|
250 | (1) |
|
10.4 Evolutionary Algorithm |
|
|
251 | (8) |
|
|
251 | (1) |
|
|
251 | (1) |
|
10.4.3 Initial Population |
|
|
252 | (1) |
|
10.4.4 Kinematic Stability |
|
|
252 | (3) |
|
|
255 | (1) |
|
|
256 | (1) |
|
|
256 | (2) |
|
|
258 | (1) |
|
|
258 | (1) |
|
|
259 | (6) |
|
|
259 | (2) |
|
|
261 | (2) |
|
10.5.3 Double-Layer Truss Grid |
|
|
263 | (2) |
|
|
265 | (4) |
|
|
265 | (4) |
|
11 Element Exchange Method for Stochastic Topology Optimization |
|
|
269 | (26) |
|
|
|
|
269 | (2) |
|
11.2 Overview of Topology Optimization Methods |
|
|
271 | (2) |
|
11.3 Element Exchange Method |
|
|
273 | (8) |
|
|
274 | (3) |
|
|
277 | (1) |
|
11.3.3 Checkerboard Control |
|
|
278 | (1) |
|
|
279 | (1) |
|
|
280 | (1) |
|
11.3.6 Convergence Criteria |
|
|
280 | (1) |
|
|
281 | (8) |
|
11.5 Influence of EEM Operations and Parameters on Optimization Results |
|
|
289 | (3) |
|
|
292 | (3) |
|
|
292 | (3) |
|
Part Two Structural Control and Identification |
|
|
295 | (182) |
|
12 Evolutionary Path-Dependent Damper Optimization for Variable Building Stiffness Distributions |
|
|
297 | (22) |
|
|
|
|
297 | (1) |
|
12.2 Concept of Adaptive Sensitivity |
|
|
298 | (1) |
|
12.3 Structural Model with Passive Dampers |
|
|
299 | (3) |
|
12.4 Critical Excitation for Variable Design |
|
|
302 | (1) |
|
12.5 Optimal Design Problem |
|
|
303 | (1) |
|
12.5.1 Performance-Based Optimal Design with Multiple Design Parameters |
|
|
303 | (1) |
|
12.5.2 Performance-Based Optimal Damper Placement for Given Supporting Members |
|
|
304 | (1) |
|
12.6 Optimality Conditions |
|
|
304 | (1) |
|
12.7 Solution Procedure of Optimal Design Problem |
|
|
305 | (5) |
|
12.7.1 Solution Procedure for the Performance-Based Optimal Design with Multiple Design Parameters |
|
|
306 | (2) |
|
12.7.2 Solution Procedure for the Optimal Design Problem with Given Supporting Members |
|
|
308 | (2) |
|
|
310 | (6) |
|
12.8.1 Adaptive Sensitivity of the Optimal Damper Placement with Multiple Design Parameters |
|
|
311 | (4) |
|
12.8.2 Optimal Damper Placement for Given Supporting Members |
|
|
315 | (1) |
|
|
316 | (3) |
|
|
317 | (1) |
|
|
317 | (2) |
|
13 Application of Genetic Algorithms in Ground Motion Selection for Seismic Analysis |
|
|
319 | (26) |
|
|
|
13.1 An Introduction to Structural Nonlinear Response-History Analysis |
|
|
319 | (5) |
|
13.1.1 The Role of Dynamic Analysis in Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering |
|
|
319 | (4) |
|
13.1.2 Selection of Ground Motion Records as an Important Challenge in PBEE |
|
|
323 | (1) |
|
13.2 A Snapshot of the Genetic Algorithm as One of the Popular Metaheuristics |
|
|
324 | (1) |
|
13.3 Code-Conforming Ground Motion Selection |
|
|
325 | (7) |
|
13.3.1 Code-Based Target Spectrum |
|
|
326 | (1) |
|
13.3.2 Instructions for Ground Motion Selection |
|
|
327 | (1) |
|
13.3.3 Definition of the Problem |
|
|
327 | (1) |
|
|
327 | (5) |
|
13.4 Ground Motion Record Selection in PBEE |
|
|
332 | (9) |
|
13.4.1 Definition of the Subject |
|
|
332 | (1) |
|
|
333 | (1) |
|
13.4.3 Precedence List of Ground Motion Records |
|
|
334 | (2) |
|
|
336 | (5) |
|
|
341 | (4) |
|
|
342 | (3) |
|
14 Optimization of Tuned Mass Damper with Harmony Search |
|
|
345 | (28) |
|
|
|
|
345 | (1) |
|
14.2 A Passive Structural Control Device: Tuned Mass Damper |
|
|
346 | (10) |
|
14.2.1 A Brief Review of Studies on Parameter Estimation of TMDs |
|
|
348 | (3) |
|
14.2.2 Equations of Motion for Structure with TMD |
|
|
351 | (5) |
|
14.3 Optimization of TMDs with HS |
|
|
356 | (2) |
|
|
358 | (7) |
|
|
358 | (3) |
|
|
361 | (4) |
|
|
365 | (8) |
|
|
369 | (1) |
|
|
369 | (4) |
|
15 Identification of Passive Devices for Vibration Control by Evolutionary Algorithms |
|
|
373 | (16) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
373 | (1) |
|
15.2 Parametric Identification of Fluid Viscous Dampers |
|
|
374 | (2) |
|
|
374 | (1) |
|
15.2.2 Problem Formulation |
|
|
375 | (1) |
|
15.3 Differential Evolution Algorithms |
|
|
376 | (1) |
|
|
376 | (1) |
|
15.3.2 Crossover Operator |
|
|
377 | (1) |
|
15.3.3 Selection Operator |
|
|
377 | (1) |
|
15.4 Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithms |
|
|
377 | (4) |
|
|
377 | (2) |
|
15.4.2 Inertia Weight and Acceleration Factors |
|
|
379 | (1) |
|
15.4.3 Chaotic Particle Swarm Optimization |
|
|
380 | (1) |
|
15.4.4 Passive Congregation |
|
|
381 | (1) |
|
15.5 Viscous Damper Identification Using Experimental Data |
|
|
381 | (5) |
|
15.5.1 Experimental Setup |
|
|
381 | (2) |
|
15.5.2 Nonclassical Parametric Identification Methods |
|
|
383 | (1) |
|
|
383 | (3) |
|
|
386 | (3) |
|
|
386 | (1) |
|
|
386 | (3) |
|
16 Structural Optimization for Frequency Constraints |
|
|
389 | (30) |
|
|
|
389 | (3) |
|
16.2 Formulation of a Structural Optimization Problem with Frequency Constraints |
|
|
392 | (2) |
|
16.3 Formulation of Optimization Problem of an Arch Dam with Frequency Constraints |
|
|
394 | (2) |
|
|
396 | (3) |
|
|
397 | (1) |
|
16.4.2 Particle Swarm Optimization |
|
|
397 | (1) |
|
|
398 | (1) |
|
|
399 | (2) |
|
|
399 | (1) |
|
|
399 | (1) |
|
|
400 | (1) |
|
|
401 | (12) |
|
16.6.1 First Example: 10-Bar Truss |
|
|
402 | (2) |
|
16.6.2 Second Example: 72-Bar Truss |
|
|
404 | (1) |
|
16.6.3 Third Example: 37-Bar Truss |
|
|
404 | (3) |
|
16.6.4 Fourth Example: 52-Bar Truss |
|
|
407 | (1) |
|
16.6.5 Fifth Example: Arch Dam |
|
|
407 | (6) |
|
|
413 | (6) |
|
|
415 | (4) |
|
17 Optimum Performance-Based Seismic Design of Frames Using Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms |
|
|
419 | (20) |
|
|
|
419 | (1) |
|
17.2 A Brief Review of Metaheuristic Algorithm |
|
|
420 | (1) |
|
17.3 Statement of Seismic Design of Frames |
|
|
421 | (2) |
|
17.4 Pushover Analysis for Performance-Based Design |
|
|
423 | (3) |
|
17.5 Utilized Metaheuristic Algorithms |
|
|
426 | (5) |
|
17.5.1 Genetic Algorithms |
|
|
426 | (2) |
|
17.5.2 Ant Colony Optimization |
|
|
428 | (2) |
|
17.5.3 Particle Swarm Optimization |
|
|
430 | (1) |
|
|
430 | (1) |
|
|
431 | (3) |
|
17.6.1 Four-Bay Three-Story Steel Frame |
|
|
432 | (1) |
|
17.6.2 Five-Bay Nine-Story Steel Frame |
|
|
433 | (1) |
|
|
434 | (5) |
|
|
435 | (4) |
|
18 Expression Programming Techniques for Formulation of Structural Engineering Systems |
|
|
439 | (18) |
|
|
|
|
439 | (1) |
|
|
440 | (2) |
|
18.2.1 Expression Programming |
|
|
440 | (2) |
|
18.3 Application to Structural Engineering Problems |
|
|
442 | (8) |
|
18.3.1 Review of State of the Art |
|
|
442 | (1) |
|
18.3.2 Numerical Experiments |
|
|
443 | (2) |
|
|
445 | (1) |
|
18.3.4 Prediction Problems |
|
|
445 | (5) |
|
|
450 | (1) |
|
|
451 | (6) |
|
|
452 | (5) |
|
19 An Evolutionary Divide-and-Conquer Strategy for Structural Identification |
|
|
457 | (20) |
|
|
|
|
457 | (1) |
|
19.2 Recent Studies on Sub-SI |
|
|
458 | (1) |
|
|
459 | (3) |
|
|
459 | (1) |
|
|
460 | (2) |
|
19.4 Divide-and-Conquer-Based Structural Identification |
|
|
462 | (4) |
|
|
466 | (2) |
|
19.6 Applications to Local Damage Detection |
|
|
468 | (2) |
|
19.7 Experimental Verification |
|
|
470 | (4) |
|
|
474 | (3) |
|
|
475 | (2) |
|
Part Three Construction Management and Maintenance |
|
|
477 | |
|
20 Swarm Intelligence for Large-Scale Optimization in Construction Management |
|
|
479 | (18) |
|
|
|
479 | (1) |
|
20.2 SI-Based Optimization Algorithms |
|
|
480 | (4) |
|
20.2.1 Memetic Algorithms |
|
|
480 | (1) |
|
20.2.2 Particle Swarm Optimization |
|
|
481 | (1) |
|
20.2.3 Ant Colony Optimization |
|
|
482 | (1) |
|
|
483 | (1) |
|
20.3 Experiments and Discussion |
|
|
484 | (9) |
|
20.3.1 Project TCT Problem |
|
|
484 | (6) |
|
20.3.2 Bridge-Deck Repair-Strategy Problem |
|
|
490 | (3) |
|
|
493 | (4) |
|
|
494 | (3) |
|
21 Network-Level Infrastructure Management Based on Metaheuristics |
|
|
497 | (22) |
|
|
|
|
497 | (1) |
|
|
498 | (2) |
|
21.3 Ant Colony Optimization |
|
|
500 | (6) |
|
21.3.1 The ACO Algorithm in General |
|
|
501 | (1) |
|
21.3.2 Rank-Based Ant System |
|
|
501 | (1) |
|
|
502 | (1) |
|
21.3.4 ACO for the Infrastructure Management Problem |
|
|
503 | (3) |
|
|
506 | (6) |
|
21.4.1 GAs for the Infrastructure Management Problem |
|
|
507 | (2) |
|
|
509 | (2) |
|
21.4.3 Additional Ways of Handling Infeasibility |
|
|
511 | (1) |
|
|
512 | (1) |
|
|
513 | (3) |
|
|
516 | (3) |
|
|
516 | (1) |
|
|
516 | (3) |
|
22 Large-Scale Maintenance Optimization Problems for Civil Infrastructure Systems |
|
|
519 | (20) |
|
|
|
|
|
519 | (1) |
|
22.2 Large-Scale Maintenance Optimization Problem |
|
|
519 | (6) |
|
22.2.1 Maintenance Optimization Formulation |
|
|
519 | (1) |
|
22.2.2 Deterministic Versus Stochastic Problem |
|
|
520 | (1) |
|
22.2.3 Single-Facility Versus Multi-Facility Problem |
|
|
521 | (2) |
|
22.2.4 Interdependency Issues for the Multi-Facility Problem (Network Level) |
|
|
523 | (2) |
|
22.3 Metaheuristic Solution Approaches |
|
|
525 | (6) |
|
22.3.1 Genetic Algorithms |
|
|
525 | (2) |
|
22.3.2 Ant Colony Optimization |
|
|
527 | (1) |
|
22.3.3 Shuffled Frog Leaping |
|
|
528 | (2) |
|
22.3.4 Hybridization of Metaheuristics |
|
|
530 | (1) |
|
|
531 | (1) |
|
|
531 | (3) |
|
|
534 | (5) |
|
|
535 | (4) |
|
23 Metaheuristic Applications in Bridge Infrastructure Maintenance Scheduling Considering Stochastic Aspects of Deterioration |
|
|
539 | |
|
|
|
|
|
539 | (1) |
|
23.2 Deterioration Modeling |
|
|
539 | (3) |
|
|
540 | (2) |
|
|
542 | (4) |
|
23.3.1 A Numerical Example |
|
|
542 | (2) |
|
23.3.2 Results and Discussion |
|
|
544 | (2) |
|
23.4 Experimental Procedure |
|
|
546 | (1) |
|
23.5 Evaluation of FRP Composite Materials in Bridge Applications |
|
|
547 | (3) |
|
23.5.1 State-of-the-Art and State-of-the-Practice |
|
|
548 | (1) |
|
23.5.2 Advantages and Challenges of AFRP Composite Materials |
|
|
549 | (1) |
|
23.6 Application of AFRP Bars in a Full-Scale Bridge Deck Slab |
|
|
550 | (2) |
|
23.6.1 Bridge Deck Specimen Layout and Test Setup |
|
|
551 | (1) |
|
23.6.2 Material Properties |
|
|
552 | (1) |
|
23.6.3 AASHTO LRFD Criteria |
|
|
552 | (1) |
|
23.7 Experimental Results |
|
|
552 | (2) |
|
|
554 | |
|
|
554 | (1) |
|
|
555 | |