Preface |
|
xv | |
Part I: Overview of Experimental Modal Analysis using the Frequency Response Method |
|
1 | (220) |
|
1 Introduction to Experimental Modal Analysis: A Simple Non-mathematical Presentation |
|
|
3 | (34) |
|
1.1 Could you Explain Modal Analysis to Me? |
|
|
6 | (4) |
|
1.2 Just what are these Measurements called FRFs? |
|
|
10 | (7) |
|
1.2.1 Why is Only One Row or Column of the FRF Matrix Needed? |
|
|
13 | (4) |
|
1.3 What's the Difference between a Shaker Test and an Impact Test? |
|
|
17 | (4) |
|
1.3.1 What Measurements do we Actually make to Compute the FRF? |
|
|
18 | (3) |
|
1.4 What's the Most Important Thing to Think about when Impact Testing? |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
1.5 What's the Most Important Thing to Think about when Shaker Testing? |
|
|
22 | (2) |
|
1.6 Tell me More About Windows; They Seem Pretty Important! |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
1.7 So how do we get Mode Shapes from the Plate FRFs? |
|
|
25 | (4) |
|
1.8 Modal Data and Operating Data |
|
|
29 | (7) |
|
1.8.1 What is Operating Data? |
|
|
29 | (4) |
|
1.8.2 So what Good is Modal Data? |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
1.8.3 So Should I Collect Modal Data or Operating Data? |
|
|
34 | (2) |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
2 General Theory of Experimental Modal Analysis |
|
|
37 | (56) |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
2.2 Basic Modal Analysis Theory-SDOF |
|
|
38 | (18) |
|
2.2.1 Single Degree of Freedom System Equation |
|
|
38 | (2) |
|
2.2.2 Single Degree of Freedom System Response due to Harmonic Excitation |
|
|
40 | (2) |
|
2.2.3 Damping Estimation for Single Degree of Freedom System |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
2.2.4 Response Assessment with Varying Damping |
|
|
43 | (3) |
|
2.2.5 Laplace Domain Approach for Single Degree of Freedom System |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
2.2.6 System Transfer Function |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
2.2.7 Different Forms of the Transfer Function |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
2.2.8 Residue of the SDOF System |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
2.2.9 Frequency Response Function for a Single Degree of Freedom System |
|
|
49 | (2) |
|
2.2.10 Transfer Function/Frequency Response Function/S-plane for a Single Degree of Freedom System |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
2.2.11 Frequency Response Function Regions for a Single Degree of Freedom System |
|
|
51 | (2) |
|
2.2.12 Different Forms of the Frequency Response Function |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
2.2.13 Complex Frequency Response Function |
|
|
53 | (3) |
|
2.3 Basic Modal Analysis Theory-MDOF |
|
|
56 | (33) |
|
2.3.1 Multiple Degree of Freedom System Equations |
|
|
57 | (9) |
|
2.3.2 Laplace Domain for Multiple Degree of Freedom System |
|
|
66 | (2) |
|
2.3.3 The Frequency Response Function |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
2.3.4 Mode Shapes from Frequency Response Equations |
|
|
68 | (3) |
|
2.3.5 Point-to-Point Frequency Response Function |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
2.3.6 Response of Multiple Degree of Freedom System to Harmonic Excitations |
|
|
72 | (3) |
|
2.3.7 Example: Cantilever Beam Model with Three Measured DOFs |
|
|
75 | (8) |
|
2.3.8 Summary of Time, Frequency, and Modal Domains |
|
|
83 | (4) |
|
2.3.9 Response due to Forced Excitation using Mode Superposition |
|
|
87 | (2) |
|
|
89 | (4) |
|
3 General Signal Processing and Measurements Related to Experimental Modal Analysis |
|
|
93 | (38) |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
3.2 Time and Frequency Domain |
|
|
93 | (3) |
|
3.3 Some General Information Regarding Data Acquisition |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
3.4 Digitization of Time Signals |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
|
97 | (3) |
|
|
98 | (2) |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
|
101 | (2) |
|
|
103 | (2) |
|
3.9 What is the Fourier Transform? |
|
|
105 | (4) |
|
3.9.1 Fourier Transform and Discrete Fourier Transform |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
3.9.2 FFT: Periodic Signal |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
3.9.3 FFT: Non-periodic Signal |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
3.10 Leakage and Minimization of Leakage |
|
|
109 | (2) |
|
3.10.1 Minimization of Leakage |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
|
111 | (8) |
|
3.11.1 Rectangular Window |
|
|
112 | (4) |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
3.11.4 Comparison of Windows with Worst Leakage Distortion Possible |
|
|
116 | (3) |
|
3.11.5 Comparison of Rectangular, Hanning and Flat Top Window |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
3.11.7 Exponential Window |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
3.11.8 Convolution of the Window in the Frequency Domain |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
3.12 Frequency Response Function Formulation |
|
|
119 | (4) |
|
3.13 Typical Measurements |
|
|
123 | (3) |
|
3.13.1 Time Signal and Auto-power Functions |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
3.13.2 Typical Measurement: Cross Power Function |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
3.13.3 Typical Measurement: Frequency Response Function |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
3.13.4 Typical Measurement: Coherence Function |
|
|
124 | (2) |
|
3.14 Time and Frequency Relationship Definition |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
3.15 Input-Output Model with Noise |
|
|
127 | (2) |
|
3.15.1 H1 Formulation: Output Noise Only |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
3.15.2 H2 Formulation: Output Noise Only |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
3.15.3 H1 Formulation: Input Noise Only |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
3.15.4 H2 Formulation: Input Noise Only |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
|
129 | (2) |
|
|
131 | (58) |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
4.2 Impact Excitation Technique |
|
|
132 | (27) |
|
|
132 | (4) |
|
4.2.2 Hammer Impact Tip Selection |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
4.2.3 Useful Frequency Range for Impact Excitation |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
4.2.4 Force Window for Impact Excitation |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
|
137 | (3) |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
4.2.7 Response due to Impact |
|
|
140 | (3) |
|
4.2.8 Roving Hammer vs Stationary Hammer and Reciprocity |
|
|
143 | (4) |
|
4.2.9 Impact Testing: an Example Set of Measurements |
|
|
147 | (12) |
|
|
159 | (13) |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
4.3.2 Historical Development of Shaker Excitation Techniques |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
4.3.3 Swept Sine Excitation |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
4.3.4 Pure Random Excitation |
|
|
163 | (2) |
|
4.3.5 Pure Random Excitation with Windows Applied |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
4.3.6 Pure Random Excitation with Overlap Processing |
|
|
165 | (2) |
|
4.3.7 Pseudo-random Excitation |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
4.3.8 Periodic Random Excitation |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
4.3.9 Burst Random Excitation |
|
|
168 | (2) |
|
4.3.10 Sine Chirp Excitation |
|
|
170 | (1) |
|
4.3.11 Digital Stepped Sine Excitation |
|
|
170 | (2) |
|
4.4 Comparison of Different Excitations for a Weldment Structure |
|
|
172 | (3) |
|
4.4.1 Random Excitation with No Window |
|
|
172 | (1) |
|
4.4.2 Random Excitation with Hanning Window |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
4.4.3 Burst Random Excitation with No Window |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
4.4.4 Sine Chirp Excitation with No Window |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
4.4.5 Comparison of Random, Burst Random and Sine Chirp |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
4.4.6 Comparison of Random and Burst Random at Resonant Peaks |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
4.4.7 Linearity Check Using Sine Chirp |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
4.5 Multiple-Input, Multiple-Output Measurement |
|
|
175 | (12) |
|
4.5.1 Multiple Input vs Single Input Testing |
|
|
177 | (4) |
|
4.5.2 Multiple Input vs Single Input for a Weldment Structure |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
4.5.3 Multiple Input vs Single Input Testing |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
4.5.4 Comparison of Multiple Input and Single Input for Weldment Structure |
|
|
182 | (1) |
|
4.5.5 MIMO Measurements on a Multi-component Structure |
|
|
182 | (5) |
|
|
187 | (2) |
|
5 Modal Parameter Estimation Techniques 1S |
|
|
S9 | |
|
|
189 | (1) |
|
5.2 Experimental Modal Analysis |
|
|
190 | (8) |
|
5.2.1 Least Squares Approximation of Data |
|
|
190 | (3) |
|
5.2.2 Classification of Modal Parameter Estimation Techniques |
|
|
193 | (5) |
|
5.3 Extraction of Modal Parameters |
|
|
198 | (8) |
|
5.3.1 Peak Picking Technique |
|
|
198 | (1) |
|
5.3.2 Circle Fitting-Kennedy and Pancu |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
|
200 | (1) |
|
5.3.4 Residual Effects of Out of Band Modes |
|
|
200 | (1) |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
5.3.6 Least Squares Complex Exponential |
|
|
201 | (2) |
|
5.3.7 Advanced Forms of Time and Frequency Domain Estimators |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
5.3.8 General Time Domain Techniques |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
5.3.9 General Frequency Domain Techniques |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
5.3.10 General Consideration for Time vs Frequency Representation |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
5.3.11 Additional Remarks on Modal Parameter Estimation |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
5.3.12 Two Step Process for Modal Parameter Estimation |
|
|
205 | (1) |
|
5.4 Mode Identification Tools |
|
|
206 | (6) |
|
|
206 | (1) |
|
5.4.2 Mode Indicator Function |
|
|
206 | (1) |
|
5.4.3 Complex Mode Indicator Function |
|
|
207 | (1) |
|
|
208 | (2) |
|
|
210 | (2) |
|
5.5 Modal Model Validation Tools |
|
|
212 | (4) |
|
5.5.1 Synthesis of Frequency Response Functions using Extracted Parameters |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
5.5.2 Modal Assurance Criterion |
|
|
213 | (2) |
|
5.5.3 Mode Participation Factors |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
5.5.4 Mode Overcomplexity |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
5.5.5 Mean Phase Co-linearity and Mean Phase Deviation |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
5.6 Operating Modal Analysis |
|
|
216 | (3) |
|
|
219 | (2) |
Part II: Practical Considerations for Experimental Modal Testing |
|
221 | (206) |
|
6 Test Setup Considerations |
|
|
223 | (24) |
|
|
224 | (1) |
|
6.2 How Many Modes Required? |
|
|
225 | (3) |
|
6.3 Frequency Range of Interest? |
|
|
228 | (4) |
|
6.4 Transducer Possibilities? |
|
|
232 | (1) |
|
|
232 | (3) |
|
6.6 How Many Measurement Points Needed? |
|
|
235 | (3) |
|
6.7 Excitation Techniques |
|
|
238 | (1) |
|
6.8 Miscellaneous Items to Consider |
|
|
238 | (7) |
|
|
245 | (2) |
|
7 Impact Testing Considerations |
|
|
247 | (46) |
|
7.1 Hammer Impact Location |
|
|
247 | (1) |
|
7.2 Hammer Tip and Frequency Range |
|
|
248 | (1) |
|
7.3 Hammers for Different Size Structures |
|
|
249 | (7) |
|
7.4 How Does Impact Skew and Deviation of Input Point Affect the Measurement? |
|
|
256 | (1) |
|
7.4.1 Skewed Impact Force |
|
|
256 | (1) |
|
7.4.2 Inconsistent Impact Force Location |
|
|
256 | (1) |
|
7.5 Impact Hammer Frequency Bandwidth |
|
|
256 | (8) |
|
7.6 Accelerometer ICP Considerations for Low Frequency Measurements |
|
|
264 | (1) |
|
7.7 Considerations for Reciprocity Measurements |
|
|
264 | (3) |
|
7.8 Roving Hammer vs Roving Accelerometer |
|
|
267 | (1) |
|
7.9 Picking a Good Reference Location |
|
|
268 | (1) |
|
7.10 Multiple Impact Difficulties and Considerations |
|
|
268 | (6) |
|
7.10.1 Academic Structure |
|
|
269 | (2) |
|
7.10.2 Large Wind Turbine Blade |
|
|
271 | (3) |
|
7.11 What is "Filter Ring" during an Impact Measurement? |
|
|
274 | (1) |
|
7.12 Test Bandwidth Much Wider than Desired Frequency Range |
|
|
275 | (4) |
|
7.13 Why Does the Structure Response Need to Come to Zero at the End of the Sample Time? |
|
|
279 | (3) |
|
7.14 Measurements with no Overload but Transducers are Saturated |
|
|
282 | (4) |
|
7.14.1 Case 1: Sensitive Accelerometer with Exponential Window |
|
|
282 | (1) |
|
7.14.2 Case 2: Sensitive Accelerometer with No Window |
|
|
283 | (1) |
|
7.14.3 Case 3: Less Sensitive Accelerometer with No Window |
|
|
283 | (3) |
|
7.15 How much Roll Off in the Input Hammer Force Spectrum is Acceptable? |
|
|
286 | (3) |
|
7.16 Can the Hammer be Switched in the Middle of a Test to Avoid Double Impacts? |
|
|
289 | (3) |
|
|
292 | (1) |
|
8 Shaker Testing Considerations |
|
|
293 | (34) |
|
8.1 General Hardware Related Issues |
|
|
293 | (9) |
|
8.1.1 General Information about Shakers and Amplifiers |
|
|
293 | (1) |
|
8.1.2 What is the Difference between the Constant Current and Constant Voltage Settings on the Shaker Amplifier? |
|
|
294 | (1) |
|
8.1.3 Some. Shakers have a Trunnion: Is it Really Needed and Why Do You Have It? |
|
|
294 | (1) |
|
8.1.4 Where is the Best Location to Place a Shaker for a Modal Test? |
|
|
295 | (1) |
|
8.1.5 How Should the Shaker be Constrained when Testing? |
|
|
296 | (1) |
|
8.1.6 What's the Best Way to Support a Shaker for Lateral Vibration When it is Hung? |
|
|
296 | (1) |
|
8.1.7 What are the Most Common Practical Failures with Shaker Setup? |
|
|
297 | (1) |
|
8.1.8 What is the Correct Level of Shaker Excitation for Modal Testing? |
|
|
297 | (1) |
|
8.1.9 How many Shakers should I use in my Modal Test? |
|
|
297 | (1) |
|
8.1.10 Shaker and Stinger Alignment Issues |
|
|
297 | (1) |
|
8.1.11 When should the Shaker be Attached to the Structure? |
|
|
298 | (1) |
|
8.1.12 Should I Disconnect the Stingers while not Testing? |
|
|
298 | (2) |
|
8.1.13 Force Gage or Impedance Head must be Mounted on Structure Side of Stinger? |
|
|
300 | (1) |
|
8.1.14 What's an Impedance Head? Why use it? Where does it go? |
|
|
301 | (1) |
|
8.2 Stinger Related Issues |
|
|
302 | (12) |
|
8.2.1 Why should Stingers be used? |
|
|
302 | (1) |
|
8.2.2 Can a Poorly Designed Shaker/Stinger Setup Produce Incorrect Results? |
|
|
303 | (3) |
|
8.2.3 Stingers and their Effect on Measured Frequency Response Functions |
|
|
306 | (8) |
|
|
307 | (1) |
|
8.2.3.2 Stinger Alignment |
|
|
307 | (1) |
|
|
308 | (2) |
|
|
310 | (1) |
|
|
310 | (4) |
|
8.2.3.6 How do Piano Wire Stingers Work? How are they Pretensioned?? |
|
|
314 | (1) |
|
8.3 Shaker Related Issues |
|
|
314 | (11) |
|
8.3.1 Is MIMO needed for Structures with Directional Modes? |
|
|
314 | (2) |
|
8.3.2 Shaker Force Levels and SISO vs MIMO Considerations |
|
|
316 | (30) |
|
8.3.2.1 High Shaker Force Levels |
|
|
316 | (2) |
|
8.3.2.2 High Shaker Force Levels |
|
|
318 | (2) |
|
8.3.2.3 Effects of FRF Measurements in the Modal Parameter Estimation Process |
|
|
320 | (5) |
|
|
325 | (2) |
|
9 Insight into Modal Parameter Estimation |
|
|
327 | (38) |
|
|
327 | (1) |
|
9.2 Mode Indicator Tools Help Identify Modes |
|
|
328 | (2) |
|
9.3 SDOF vs MDOF for a Simple System |
|
|
330 | (2) |
|
9.4 Local vs Global: MACL Frame |
|
|
332 | (2) |
|
9.5 Repeated Root: Composite Spar |
|
|
334 | (1) |
|
9.6 Wind Turbine Blade: Same Geometry but Very Different Modes |
|
|
335 | (2) |
|
9.7 Stability Diagram Demystified |
|
|
337 | (3) |
|
9.8 Curvefitting Demystified |
|
|
340 | (3) |
|
9.9 Curvefitting Different Bands for the Poles and Residues |
|
|
343 | (1) |
|
9.10 Synthesizing the FRF from Parameters from Several Bands Stitched Together |
|
|
344 | (2) |
|
9.11 A Large Multiple Reference Modal Test Parameter Estimation |
|
|
346 | (11) |
|
9.11.1 Case 1: Use of All Measured FRFs |
|
|
346 | (4) |
|
9.11.2 Case 2: Use of Selected Sets of Measured FRFs |
|
|
350 | (2) |
|
9.11.3 Case 3: Use of PolyMAX |
|
|
352 | (5) |
|
9.12 Operating Modal Analysis |
|
|
357 | (6) |
|
|
363 | (2) |
|
10 General Considerations |
|
|
365 | (30) |
|
10.1 An Experimental Modal Test: a Thought Process Divulged |
|
|
369 | (8) |
|
|
377 | (2) |
|
10.2.1 General FFT Analyzer Setup |
|
|
377 | (1) |
|
10.2.2 Setup for Impact Testing |
|
|
378 | (1) |
|
10.2.3 Setup for Shaker Testing |
|
|
379 | (1) |
|
|
379 | (1) |
|
10.4 Practical Considerations: Checklists |
|
|
379 | (13) |
|
10.4.1 Checklist for Analyzer Setup |
|
|
380 | (2) |
|
10.4.2 Checklist for Impact Testing |
|
|
382 | (2) |
|
10.4.3 Checklist for Shaker Testing |
|
|
384 | (2) |
|
10.4.4 Checklist for Measurement Adequacy |
|
|
386 | (2) |
|
10.4.5 Checklist for Miscellaneous |
|
|
388 | (4) |
|
10.5 Summary 391 Appendix: Logbook Forms |
|
|
392 | (3) |
|
11 Tips, Tricks, and Other Stuff |
|
|
395 | (32) |
|
11.1 Modal Testing Primer |
|
|
396 | (4) |
|
|
396 | (1) |
|
|
397 | (1) |
|
11.1.3 Drive Point Measurements |
|
|
398 | (1) |
|
|
398 | (1) |
|
11.1.5 Inappropriate Reference Location |
|
|
399 | (1) |
|
11.1.6 Multiple-input, Multiple-output Testing |
|
|
399 | (1) |
|
11.1.7 Multiple Reference Testing |
|
|
400 | (1) |
|
11.2 Impact Hammer and Impulsive Excitation |
|
|
400 | (3) |
|
11.2.1 The Right Hammer for the Test |
|
|
400 | (1) |
|
11.2.2 Hammer-Get the Swing of it |
|
|
401 | (1) |
|
|
401 | (1) |
|
11.2.4 Hammer tip selection |
|
|
401 | (1) |
|
11.2.5 No Hammer: Improvise |
|
|
402 | (1) |
|
11.2.6 Pete's Hammer Test Impact Ritual |
|
|
402 | (1) |
|
11.3 Accelerometer Issues |
|
|
403 | (8) |
|
|
403 | (1) |
|
11.3.2 Mass Loading Effects from Tri-axial Accelerometers |
|
|
404 | (3) |
|
11.3.3 Accelerometer Sensitivity Selection |
|
|
407 | (1) |
|
11.3.4 Tri-axial Accelerometers |
|
|
408 | (3) |
|
11.4 Curvefitting Considerations |
|
|
411 | (3) |
|
11.4.1 Should all Measurements be used when Curvefitting |
|
|
412 | (2) |
|
11.5 Blue Frame with Three Plate Subsystem |
|
|
414 | (8) |
|
11.6 Miscellaneous Issues |
|
|
422 | (3) |
|
11.6.1 Modal Test Axis Labels |
|
|
422 | (1) |
|
11.6.2 Testing Does Not Need to Start at point 1 |
|
|
423 | (1) |
|
11.6.3 Test to a Wider Frequency Range |
|
|
423 | (1) |
|
11.6.4 U1 times Uj; the key to many questions |
|
|
423 | (2) |
|
|
425 | (2) |
A Linear Algebra: Basic Operations Needed for Modal Analysis Operations |
|
427 | (6) |
|
|
427 | (1) |
|
A.2 Define a Column Vector |
|
|
427 | (1) |
|
|
428 | (1) |
|
A.4 Define a Diagonal Matrix |
|
|
428 | (1) |
|
A.5 Define Matrix Addition |
|
|
428 | (1) |
|
A.6 Define Matrix Scalar Multiply |
|
|
428 | (1) |
|
A.7 Define Matrix Multiply |
|
|
429 | (1) |
|
A.8 Matrix Multiplication Rules |
|
|
429 | (1) |
|
A.9 Transpose of a Matrix |
|
|
430 | (1) |
|
|
430 | (1) |
|
A.11 Symmetric Matrix Rules |
|
|
430 | (1) |
|
A.12 Define a Matrix Inverse |
|
|
431 | (1) |
|
A.13 Matrix Inverse Properties |
|
|
431 | (1) |
|
A.14 Define an Eigenvalue Problem |
|
|
431 | (1) |
|
|
431 | (1) |
|
A.16 Singular Value Decomposition |
|
|
432 | (1) |
B Example Using Two Degree of Freedom System: Eigenproblem |
|
433 | (4) |
C Pole, Residue, and FRF Problem for 2-DOF System |
|
437 | (6) |
D Example using Three Degree of Freedom System |
|
443 | (8) |
E DYNSYS Website Materials |
|
451 | (12) |
|
E.1 Technical Materials Developed |
|
|
451 | (2) |
|
E.1.1 Theoretical Aspects of First and Second Order Systems |
|
|
452 | (1) |
|
E.1.2 First Order Systems: Modeling Step with ODE and Block Diagram |
|
|
452 | (1) |
|
E.1.3 Second Order Systems: Modeling Step, Impulse, IC with ODE and Block Diagram |
|
|
452 | (1) |
|
E.1.4 Mathematical Modeling Considerations |
|
|
452 | (1) |
|
E.1.5 Simulink and MATLAB Primer Materials |
|
|
453 | (1) |
|
E.1.6 Miscellaneous Materials |
|
|
453 | (1) |
|
E.2 DYNSYS.UML.EDU Website |
|
|
453 | (10) |
F Basic Modal Analysis Information |
|
463 | (4) |
|
|
463 | (3) |
|
|
463 | (1) |
|
F.1.2 System Transfer Function |
|
|
464 | (1) |
|
F.1.3 Different Forms of the System Transfer Function |
|
|
464 | (1) |
|
F.1.4 Frequency Response Function |
|
|
465 | (1) |
|
|
466 | (1) |
Part III: Collection of Sets of Modal Data Collected for Processing |
|
467 | (52) |
|
G Repeated Root Frame: Boundary Condition Effects |
|
|
469 | (10) |
|
G.1 Corner Supports Set #1 |
|
|
470 | (4) |
|
G.2 Midlength Supports Set #2 |
|
|
474 | (1) |
|
G.3 Modal Correlation between Set #1 and Set #2 |
|
|
474 | (5) |
|
H Radarsat Satellite Testing |
|
|
479 | (8) |
|
H.1 Data Reduction Set 1: Reference BUS:109:Z, BUS:118:Z, PMS:217:X and PMS:1211:Y |
|
|
479 | (1) |
|
H.2 Data Reduction Set 2: Reference PMS:217:X and PMS:1211:Y |
|
|
479 | (8) |
|
|
487 | (10) |
|
|
487 | (1) |
|
I.2 SIMO Testing with Skewed Shaker |
|
|
487 | (6) |
|
I.3 MIMO Testing with Two Vertical Modal Shakers |
|
|
493 | (4) |
|
J Whirlpool Dryer Cabinet Modal Testing |
|
|
497 | (4) |
|
K GM MTU Automobile Round Robin Modal Testing |
|
|
501 | (4) |
|
L UML Composite Spar Modal Testing |
|
|
505 | (4) |
|
|
509 | (6) |
|
|
515 | (4) |
Index |
|
519 | |