General Preface |
|
ix | |
Preface and acknowledgments |
|
x | |
|
|
1 | (3) |
|
1 What Must and Can Must and Can Mean |
|
|
4 | (23) |
|
1.1 Must and can are relational |
|
|
4 | (5) |
|
1.2 Must and can in a premise semantics |
|
|
9 | (3) |
|
1.3 Inconsistent premise sets |
|
|
12 | (4) |
|
1.4 Structuring premise sets |
|
|
16 | (11) |
|
|
21 | (6) |
|
2 The Notional Category of Modality |
|
|
27 | (45) |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
2.2 Expressing modality in German |
|
|
28 | (2) |
|
|
30 | (8) |
|
2.4 Grades of possibility |
|
|
38 | (5) |
|
|
43 | (6) |
|
2.6 Root versus epistemic modals |
|
|
49 | (6) |
|
2.7 Approaching norms and ideals with root modals |
|
|
55 | (7) |
|
|
62 | (2) |
|
|
64 | (4) |
|
|
68 | (4) |
|
|
70 | (2) |
|
3 Partition and Revision: The Semantics of Counterfactuals |
|
|
72 | (14) |
|
3.1 A straightforward analysis seems to fail |
|
|
72 | (2) |
|
3.2 Escaping through atomism |
|
|
74 | (2) |
|
3.3 Counterexamples and amendments |
|
|
76 | (4) |
|
3.4 Back to the original analysis |
|
|
80 | (4) |
|
|
84 | (2) |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
|
86 | (25) |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
4.3 The decline of material implication |
|
|
88 | (3) |
|
4.4 Probability conditionals |
|
|
91 | (6) |
|
4.5 Epistemic conditionals |
|
|
97 | (8) |
|
4.6 Gibbard's proof reconsidered: silent operators |
|
|
105 | (2) |
|
4.7 Conditional propositions after all? |
|
|
107 | (4) |
|
|
109 | (2) |
|
5 An Investigation of the Lumps of Thought |
|
|
111 | (50) |
|
5.1 What lumps of thought are |
|
|
111 | (3) |
|
5.2 How lumps of thought can be characterized in terms of situations |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
5.3 A semantics based on situations |
|
|
115 | (10) |
|
5.3.1 A metaphysics for situations |
|
|
115 | (2) |
|
5.3.2 Ingredients for a situation semantics |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
5.3.3 The logical properties and relations |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
|
118 | (2) |
|
5.3.5 Sentence denotations |
|
|
120 | (5) |
|
5.4 Counterfactual reasoning |
|
|
125 | (10) |
|
5.4.1 Some facts about counterfactuals |
|
|
125 | (2) |
|
5.4.2 Truth-conditions for counterfactuals |
|
|
127 | (2) |
|
5.4.3 We forgot about lumps |
|
|
129 | (2) |
|
5.4.4 The formal definitions |
|
|
131 | (4) |
|
5.5 Representing non-accidental generalizations |
|
|
135 | (17) |
|
5.5.1 Non-accidental generalizations: a first proposal |
|
|
135 | (3) |
|
5.5.2 Hempel's Paradox and Goodman's Puzzle |
|
|
138 | (14) |
|
|
152 | (7) |
|
5.6.1 In search of an accidental interpretation |
|
|
152 | (2) |
|
5.6.2 Negation and restrictive clauses |
|
|
154 | (2) |
|
5.6.3 Negation and counterfactual reasoning |
|
|
156 | (3) |
|
|
159 | (2) |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
6 Facts: Particulars or Information Units? |
|
|
161 | (23) |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
6.2 Facts and the semantics of the verb to know |
|
|
162 | (3) |
|
6.3 Facts that exemplify propositions |
|
|
165 | (8) |
|
6.4 Reliability in knowledge ascriptions |
|
|
173 | (6) |
|
6.5 Facts and counterfactuals |
|
|
179 | (2) |
|
6.6 Propositional facts and natural propositions |
|
|
181 | (3) |
References |
|
184 | (13) |
Index |
|
197 | |