Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Non-Participation in Armed Conflict: Continuity and Modern Challenges to the Law of Neutrality

  • Formaat: PDF+DRM
  • Ilmumisaeg: 03-Mar-2022
  • Kirjastus: Cambridge University Press
  • Keel: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9781009092043
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Formaat - PDF+DRM
  • Hind: 37,04 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • See e-raamat on mõeldud ainult isiklikuks kasutamiseks. E-raamatuid ei saa tagastada.
  • Formaat: PDF+DRM
  • Ilmumisaeg: 03-Mar-2022
  • Kirjastus: Cambridge University Press
  • Keel: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9781009092043
Teised raamatud teemal:

DRM piirangud

  • Kopeerimine (copy/paste):

    ei ole lubatud

  • Printimine:

    ei ole lubatud

  • Kasutamine:

    Digitaalõiguste kaitse (DRM)
    Kirjastus on väljastanud selle e-raamatu krüpteeritud kujul, mis tähendab, et selle lugemiseks peate installeerima spetsiaalse tarkvara. Samuti peate looma endale  Adobe ID Rohkem infot siin. E-raamatut saab lugeda 1 kasutaja ning alla laadida kuni 6'de seadmesse (kõik autoriseeritud sama Adobe ID-ga).

    Vajalik tarkvara
    Mobiilsetes seadmetes (telefon või tahvelarvuti) lugemiseks peate installeerima selle tasuta rakenduse: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    PC või Mac seadmes lugemiseks peate installima Adobe Digital Editionsi (Seeon tasuta rakendus spetsiaalselt e-raamatute lugemiseks. Seda ei tohi segamini ajada Adober Reader'iga, mis tõenäoliselt on juba teie arvutisse installeeritud )

    Seda e-raamatut ei saa lugeda Amazon Kindle's. 

"Non-participation in armed conflict gives rise to the relevance, role and content of the law of neutrality in contemporary international law. Despite scholarly opinion to the contrary, the challenges posed by collective security and the prohibition of the use of force have not made neutrality obsolete. The validity of the law of neutrality is reaffirmed in State practice, mainly in the form of national military manuals, and the case law of international tribunals. The legal framework of neutrality remains the same with respect to most rules. At the same time, it has been adapted to the evolution of the law of the sea as a result of the 1982 UN Law of the Sea Convention, the globalization of trade and the use of cyberspace in armed conflict. This has been achieved mainly through soft law documents and national military manuals. Neutrality, however, remains inapplicable in non-international armed conflict"--

Muu info

Revisits the law of neutrality and discusses its relevance to contemporary international and non-international armed conflict.
Acknowledgements xi
Table of Cases
xiii
Table of Treaties
xvii
Table of Documents
xxiii
List of Abbreviations
xxix
Introduction 1(7)
1 Is the Law of Neutrality Obsolete?
8(50)
1.1 Introduction
8(17)
1.1.1 The Concept of Neutrality
8(2)
1.1.2 Sources
10(2)
1.1.3 Related Concepts: Permanent Neutrality, Armed Neutrality, Non-belligerency and Benevolent Neutrality
12(1)
1.1.3.1 Permanent Neutrality
12(1)
1.1.3.2 Armed Neutrality
13(1)
1.1.3.3 Non-belligerency and Benevolent Neutrality
13(4)
1.1.4 Scope of Application
17(1)
1.1.4.1 Neutrality and Formal State of War
17(1)
1.1.4.2 Neutrality: From State of War to Armed Conflict
18(3)
1.1.4.3 Is a Proclamation of Neutrality Required?
21(1)
1.1.4.4 Neutrality and Classification of Armed Conflict
21(1)
1.1.4.5 Neutrality and Intensity of Armed Conflict
22(1)
1.1.4.6 Termination of Neutrality
23(2)
1.2 Good Riddance to Neutrality?
25(33)
1.2.1 Treaties
26(2)
1.2.2 Neutrality as Part of Customary International Law
28(10)
1.2.3 Challenges to the Law of Neutrality
38(1)
1.2.3.1 Collective Security
38(5)
1.2.3.2 The Renunciation of War in the Pact of Paris (1928)
43(2)
1.2.4 The Relevance of Gross Violations and the Role of Power
45(13)
2 The United Nations' Collective Security System and Neutrality
58(16)
2.1 Introduction
58(1)
2.2 Neutrality and the UN Charter
59(1)
2.3 Neutrality and Specific Obligations under the UN Charter
60(5)
2.4 Neutrality and the Uniting for Peace Resolution
65(1)
2.5 State Practice: Military Manuals
66(2)
2.6 Security Council Practice
68(2)
2.7 State Practice vis a vis UN Enforcement Action
70(2)
2.8 Concluding Remarks
72(2)
3 Rights and Duties under the Law of Neutrality
74(70)
3.1 Introduction
74(1)
3.2 Inviolability of Neutral Territory
75(13)
3.2.1 Prohibition of Conducting Military Operations on Neutral Territory
76(4)
3.2.2 Prohibition of Using Neutral Territory as Base of Operations
80(2)
3.2.3 Prohibition of Transport of Troops and Supplies through Neutral Territory
82(4)
3.2.3.1 The Effect of UN LOSC on Neutrality
86(2)
3.3 Recruitment of Combatants
88(2)
3.3.1 The Role of Private Military Companies
89(1)
3.4 Neutral Commerce
90(40)
3.4.1 The Duty of Neutrals Not to Supply Belligerents with Goods That Sustain Their War Effort
91(3)
3.4.1.1 Restrictions Initiated by Neutral States
94(1)
3.4.1.2 Neutral Due Diligence
95(2)
3.4.1.3 Total Interdiction of Neutral Commerce and Globalized Economy
97(4)
3.4.2 Belligerent Rights: Visit and Search, Contraband, Blockade, Seizure or Destruction of Neutral Vessels or Aircraft
101(1)
3.4.2.1 The Belligerent Right of Visit and Search
102(4)
3.4.2.2 Contraband
106(8)
3.4.2.3 Capture or Destruction of Neutral Vessels
114(9)
3.4.2.4 Blockade
123(7)
3.5 Neutrals as Humanitarians: The Rights and Duties of Neutrals in the Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocol I
130(12)
3.5.1 Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked
131(1)
3.5.2 The Protecting Powers
132(2)
3.5.3 Neutral Medical Personnel (Articles 27 and 32 GC I)
134(2)
3.5.4 Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked on Neutral Vessels (Articles 15 and 21 GC II) and Neutral Ports (Article 17 GC II)
136(2)
3.5.5 Hospital Ships Utilized by Humanitarian Organizations of Neutral States (Articles 25 and 32 GC II and Article 22 AP I)
138(1)
3.5.6 Medical Aircraft (Articles 37 GCI 40 GC II and 31 AP I)
138(2)
3.5.7 Prisoners of War (POWs)
140(1)
3.5.8 Neutral Nationals (Article 4 GC IV)
141(1)
3.6 Services to Belligerents
142(2)
4 Neutrality and the Use of Force
144(31)
4.1 Introduction
144(1)
4.2 Neutrality and the Prohibition of the Use of Force
145(3)
4.3 Neutrality and Self-Defence
148(15)
4.4 Evaluation
163(12)
4.4.1 The Legal Basis for the Use of Force: Jus ad Bellum or Jus in Bello?
163(1)
4.4.2 Neutrality and Self-Defence
164(2)
4.4.2.1 Violation of Neutral Territory by a Belligerent
166(1)
4.4.2.2 Violation of Neutrality in General by a Belligerent
167(1)
4.4.2.3 The `Unwilling or Unable' Doctrine
168(4)
4.4.3 Self-Defence beyond Neutrality
172(3)
5 Neutrality and Non-international Armed Conflict
175(26)
5.1 Introduction
175(2)
5.2 Recognition of Belligerency
177(4)
5.3 From Recognition of Belligerency to Non-intervention
181(2)
5.4 The Impact of the Spanish Civil War
183(4)
5.5 The Present Legal Framework
187(14)
6 Neutrality and Cyber Warfare
201(19)
6.1 Introduction
201(1)
6.2 The Applicability of the Law of Armed Conflict in Cyberspace
202(3)
6.3 The Application of the Law of Neutrality
205(1)
6.4 The Tallinn Manual 2.0 Rules
206(10)
6.5 Concluding Remarks
216(4)
7 Conclusions
220(27)
Bibliography 247(8)
Index 255
Constantine Antonopoulos is Associate Professor of Public International Law at the Faculty of Law, Democritus University of Thrace. He is a member of several academic societies, including the American Society of International Law; the European Society of International Law; and the International Law Association's Board of Hellenic Branch and the Committee on the Use of Force.