Symbols and abbreviations |
|
xi | |
Acknowledgments |
|
xiii | |
Introduction |
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
2 The NP-strategy for expressing reciprocity: Typology, history, syntax and semantics |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
3 The literature on reciprocal constructions |
|
|
3 | (7) |
|
4 A methodology for constructing a typology for reciprocal constructions |
|
|
10 | (3) |
|
5 The methodology in practice: The NP-strategy for expressing reciprocity |
|
|
13 | (2) |
|
6 The semantics of the NP-strategy for expressing reciprocity -- preliminary observations |
|
|
15 | (5) |
|
7 Building theoretical bridges between historical linguistics and formal semantics |
|
|
20 | (5) |
|
|
20 | (3) |
|
|
23 | (2) |
|
8 The scope and goals of the book |
|
|
25 | (3) |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
|
25 | (3) |
|
9 The structure of the book and the intended audience |
|
|
28 | (5) |
|
|
|
Chapter 1 The types of constructions and their origin |
|
|
33 | (28) |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
1.2 Types of NP-strategy constructions for expressing reciprocity in Semitic languages |
|
|
34 | (3) |
|
1.3 Two-unit constructions: Origin and semantics |
|
|
37 | (16) |
|
1.3.1 Two-unit constructions: A nominal construction |
|
|
37 | (6) |
|
1.3.2 Two-unit constructions: Pronominal constructions |
|
|
43 | (10) |
|
1.4 A compositional explanation for the origin of the NP-strategy constructions |
|
|
53 | (6) |
|
|
59 | (2) |
|
Chapter 2 The diachronic development from a two-unit to a one-unit construction |
|
|
61 | (34) |
|
|
61 | (2) |
|
2.2 Previous proposals for the emergence of the one-unit construction |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
2.3 Syntactic differences between the one- and the two-unit construction |
|
|
64 | (4) |
|
2.4 The diachronic development within the NP-strategy |
|
|
68 | (16) |
|
|
68 | (3) |
|
|
71 | (4) |
|
|
75 | (9) |
|
2.5 An interim summary and the significance of the observations |
|
|
84 | (2) |
|
2.6 From one- to two-unit constructions |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
2.7 Conclusions and extrapolations |
|
|
87 | (8) |
|
2.7.1 Diachronic developments, syntax and semantics |
|
|
87 | (2) |
|
2.7.2 The nature of the change from two- to one-unit constructions |
|
|
89 | (3) |
|
2.7.3 Future typological study |
|
|
92 | (3) |
|
|
|
Chapter 3 Relics as a syntactic category: Modern Hebrew and Italian constructions as frozen formulae |
|
|
95 | (18) |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
3.2 Modern Hebrew and Modern Italian constructions |
|
|
96 | (6) |
|
3.3 The syntax of the one-unit construction in Modern Hebrew (and Modern Italian) |
|
|
102 | (7) |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
3.5 In real time: A diachronic development in Modern Hebrew |
|
|
109 | (2) |
|
|
111 | (2) |
|
Chapter 4 Heterogeneity: Languages with more than one NP-Strategy construction |
|
|
113 | (38) |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
4.2 Various approaches to account for heterogeneity |
|
|
114 | (3) |
|
4.3 Part 1: The range of NP-strategy constructions in Early and Late Hebrew |
|
|
117 | (17) |
|
4.3.1 The relation between Early and Late Hebrew |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
4.3.2 NP-strategy in Biblical Hebrew |
|
|
118 | (2) |
|
4.3.3 NP-strategy in Mishnaic Hebrew |
|
|
120 | (5) |
|
4.3.4 The functions of the Biblical and Mishnaic constructions |
|
|
125 | (6) |
|
4.3.5 Another type of heterogeneity in Mishnaic Hebrew |
|
|
131 | (3) |
|
4.4 Part 2: Heterogeneity in Modern Hebrew |
|
|
134 | (14) |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
4.4.2 The origin of the Modern Hebrew constructions |
|
|
135 | (3) |
|
4.4.3 The availability of the two-unit construction in Modern Hebrew |
|
|
138 | (4) |
|
4.4.4 A mixed-gender antecedent |
|
|
142 | (4) |
|
4.4.5 Semantic agreement with plural subjects |
|
|
146 | (2) |
|
4.5 Summary and concluding remarks |
|
|
148 | (3) |
|
Chapter 5 Changing meaning of the NP-strategy constructions |
|
|
151 | (32) |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
5.2 One-unit anaphors and adverbs |
|
|
152 | (5) |
|
5.2.1 The adverbial strategy for expressing reciprocity |
|
|
152 | (2) |
|
5.2.2 Defining the adverbial strategy for expressing reciprocity |
|
|
154 | (3) |
|
5.3 The Akkadian expression ahdmis |
|
|
157 | (7) |
|
5.3.1 Ahdmis as an anaphor |
|
|
157 | (4) |
|
5.3.2 A putative shift: One-unit anaphor adverb |
|
|
161 | (3) |
|
5.4 Strategies for encoding reciprocity versus collective, sociative and comitative expressions |
|
|
164 | (4) |
|
5.4.1 Collective, sociative and comitative expressions |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
5.4.2 Shifts in meaning between the conceptual categories of reciprocity and sociativity |
|
|
165 | (3) |
|
5.5 The origin of the Akkadian one-unit anaphor ahdmis |
|
|
168 | (8) |
|
5.6 Summary and discussion of formal analyses of changes in meaning |
|
|
176 | (5) |
|
5.7 Appendix: An observation found in an ancient text on the grammatical relationship between the reciprocal and the sociative domains |
|
|
181 | (2) |
|
Chapter 6 A comparative linguistics study of NP-strategy constructions |
|
|
183 | (16) |
|
|
183 | (1) |
|
6.2 A brief history of Aramaic |
|
|
183 | (1) |
|
6.3 NP-strategy constructions in the history of Aramaic |
|
|
184 | (4) |
|
6.4 Linking Eastern Neo-Aramaic NP-strategy constructions with their Late Aramaic forebears |
|
|
188 | (6) |
|
6.4.1 Two types of constructions preserved from late Aramaic |
|
|
188 | (1) |
|
6.4.2 Derivatives of the Late-Aramaic one-unit constructions/anaphors |
|
|
189 | (1) |
|
6.4.3 NENA forms deriving from unattested morphemes |
|
|
190 | (2) |
|
6.4.4 The emergence of a new one-unit anaphor |
|
|
192 | (2) |
|
|
194 | (5) |
|
|
|
Chapter 7 The basic meaning of the NP-strategy for expressing reciprocity |
|
|
199 | (40) |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
7.2 Structure and meaning |
|
|
200 | (2) |
|
|
202 | (4) |
|
7.4 The Strongest Meaning Hypothesis |
|
|
206 | (4) |
|
|
210 | (3) |
|
7.6 Non-reciprocal readings of NP-strategy constructions for expressing reciprocity |
|
|
213 | (8) |
|
7.7 Unspecified constructions |
|
|
221 | (12) |
|
7.7.1 A weak interpretation as the basic meaning |
|
|
221 | (3) |
|
7.7.2 NP-strategy constructions under negation |
|
|
224 | (4) |
|
7.7.3 Support from diachronic evidence |
|
|
228 | (5) |
|
7.8 The indifference implicature |
|
|
233 | (3) |
|
7.9 An additional type of implied meaning |
|
|
236 | (1) |
|
|
237 | (2) |
|
Chapter 8 Specifying the meaning of the NP-strategy through context |
|
|
239 | (26) |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
8.2 The role of context in interpretation |
|
|
240 | (2) |
|
8.3 Hypothesis: Consistency with relevant descriptions of events in causal relations (CRDECR) |
|
|
242 | (12) |
|
8.3.1 Identifying the causal relations for a given context |
|
|
242 | (5) |
|
8.3.2 Inducing alternatives |
|
|
247 | (4) |
|
8.3.3 Broader issues germane to the current analysis |
|
|
251 | (3) |
|
8.4 The NP-strategy with focus-sensitive particles |
|
|
254 | (1) |
|
8.5 The indifference implicature within CRDECR |
|
|
255 | (3) |
|
|
258 | (3) |
|
8.6.1 Sentences out of context |
|
|
258 | (2) |
|
8.6.2 Contextual contradictions |
|
|
260 | (1) |
|
|
261 | (4) |
References |
|
265 | (20) |
Language index |
|
285 | (4) |
Subject index |
|
289 | |