Eugene Sue (1804-57), like his contemporary Alexandre Dumas pere, was one of the most successful writers of his time. Les Mysteres de Paris, the novel for which he is most remembered, became a publishing sensation. In its serial form, it took the public by storm - readers fought for copies of the next instalment - and in book form its print-run reached an unprecedented 60,000. Christopher Prendergast's study engages with the problematic of emerging forms of popular literature on the basis of a specific hypothesis: that Les Mysteres de Paris, written and published in serial form, was, through the pressure of Sue's reader-correspondents (many of them barely literate), a collective production, 'written by the people for the people'. Prendergast examines the phenomenon of popular literature and reader response in the nineteenth century to illuminate larger issues in the sociology of literature.
Prendergast (emeritus modern French literature, U. of Cambridge) has finally decided that a project he conceived some 20 years ago will always be too ambitious for him to undertake. So here he reduces and distills his substantial but radically incomplete body of research to sketch a method by which other hands may further the task. That task engages the problem of emerging forms of popular literature, centered on Sue's novel, which was first published in serial form in a newspaper between June 1842 and October 1843. Distributed by the David Brown Book Company. Annotation ©2004 Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (booknews.com)
Eugene Sue (1804-57), like his contemporary Alexandre Dumas pere, was one of the most successful writers of his time. Les Mysteres de Paris, the novel for which he is most remembered, became a publishing sensation. In its serial form, it took the public by storm — readers fought for copies of the next instalment — and in book form its print-run reached an unprecedented 60,000. Christopher Prendergast’s study engages with the problematic of emerging forms of popular literature on the basis of a specific hypothesis: that Les Mysteres de Paris, written and published in serial form, was, through the pressure of Sue’s reader-correspondents (many of them barely literate), a collective production, ‘written by the people for the people’. Prendergast examines the phenomenon of popular literature and reader response in the nineteenth century to illuminate larger issues in the sociology of literature.