Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Person, Case, and Agreement: The Morphosyntax of Inverse Agreement and Global Case Splits

(Post-doctoral Researcher, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London)
  • Formaat: 240 pages
  • Ilmumisaeg: 17-Nov-2017
  • Kirjastus: Oxford University Press
  • Keel: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780192526205
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Formaat - PDF+DRM
  • Hind: 116,60 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • See e-raamat on mõeldud ainult isiklikuks kasutamiseks. E-raamatuid ei saa tagastada.
Person, Case, and Agreement: The Morphosyntax of Inverse Agreement and Global Case SplitsSuurem pilt
  • Formaat: 240 pages
  • Ilmumisaeg: 17-Nov-2017
  • Kirjastus: Oxford University Press
  • Keel: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780192526205
Teised raamatud teemal:

DRM piirangud

  • Kopeerimine (copy/paste):

    ei ole lubatud

  • Printimine:

    ei ole lubatud

  • Kasutamine:

    Digitaalõiguste kaitse (DRM)
    Kirjastus on väljastanud selle e-raamatu krüpteeritud kujul, mis tähendab, et selle lugemiseks peate installeerima spetsiaalse tarkvara. Samuti peate looma endale  Adobe ID Rohkem infot siin. E-raamatut saab lugeda 1 kasutaja ning alla laadida kuni 6'de seadmesse (kõik autoriseeritud sama Adobe ID-ga).

    Vajalik tarkvara
    Mobiilsetes seadmetes (telefon või tahvelarvuti) lugemiseks peate installeerima selle tasuta rakenduse: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    PC või Mac seadmes lugemiseks peate installima Adobe Digital Editionsi (Seeon tasuta rakendus spetsiaalselt e-raamatute lugemiseks. Seda ei tohi segamini ajada Adober Reader'iga, mis tõenäoliselt on juba teie arvutisse installeeritud )

    Seda e-raamatut ei saa lugeda Amazon Kindle's. 

This book provides both language-specific and cross-linguistic comparative analyses of phenomena relating to person, case and case-marking, and agreement. It offers an explicit and detailed analysis of differential object marking in Hungarian, and shows that the same general type of analysis can account for related phenomena in unrelated languages such as Kashmiri and Sahaptin. In Hungarian, the person of both the subject and the object determines verbal morphology, while in Kashmiri and Sahaptin, person determines object case-marking and subject case-marking, respectively. Andras Barany adopts broadly the same analysis for these three languages, focusing on how person and agreement influence case-marking. In contrast, the final chapters examine how case-marking influences agreement and show how to account for both orders of interaction. Finally, the author discusses typological generalizations based on the interaction of case and agreement and shows how only the attested patterns of case-marking and agreement in ditransitive clauses are predicted.

The book combines data from eight different language families with theory and explicit analyses, and will be of interest to both formal and data-oriented linguists and typologists alike.
Acknowledgements x
List of figures and tables
xi
Abbreviations xii
1 Person, case, and agreement
1(19)
1.1 Introduction
1(1)
1.2 Differential object marking
2(3)
1.3 Person features and hierarchies
5(3)
1.3.1 Hierarchies and functional approaches to DOM
7(1)
1.4 Case and agreement
8(3)
1.5 Theoretical assumptions
11(6)
1.5.1 Cyclic Agree
12(2)
1.5.2 Agree can fail
14(1)
1.5.3 Case features
15(1)
1.5.4 Syntax and morphology
16(1)
1.6 The sample of languages
17(3)
2 Differential object marking in Hungarian
20(35)
2.1 The Hungarian noun phrase and φ-features
20(3)
2.2 Differential object agreement in Hungarian
23(14)
2.2.1 Direct objects and subject agreement
25(5)
2.2.2 Direct objects and object agreement
30(7)
2.3 Analysis
37(16)
2.3.1 Object agreement is not semantic
38(4)
2.3.2 D and person
42(1)
2.3.3 Deriving agreement
43(8)
2.3.4 Putting the pieces together: agreement in the clause
51(2)
2.3.5 Interim summary
53(1)
2.4 Conclusions
53(2)
3 Inverse agreement in Hungarian
55(49)
3.1 Introduction
55(1)
3.2 Object agreement with personal pronouns
56(6)
3.2.1 The distribution of object agreement with personal pronouns
58(4)
3.3 Deriving inverse agreement in Hungarian
62(13)
3.3.1 Arguments for covert agreement
69(4)
3.3.2 Third person arguments
73(1)
3.3.3 Interim summary
74(1)
3.4 Spelling out agreement
75(14)
3.4.1 Hungarian verb morphology and spell-out rules
76(6)
3.4.2 Revised spell-out rules
82(1)
3.4.3 Verbal agreement and possessive suffixes
83(3)
3.4.4 Further issues in verb morphology
86(3)
3.4.5 Interim summary
89(1)
3.5 Other analyses of object agreement
89(10)
3.5.1 Agreement with third person objects
90(1)
3.5.2 Agreement with first, second, and third person objects
91(4)
3.5.3 Inclusive reference, again
95(4)
3.5.4 Interim summary
99(1)
3.6 Summary and conclusions
99(1)
3.7 Appendix: full derivations
100(4)
3.7.1 Direct configuration
100(1)
3.7.2 Inverse configuration
101(1)
3.7.3 Two third person arguments
102(2)
4 Agreement and global case splits: agreement determining case
104(47)
4.1 Introduction
104(2)
4.2 Case studies: inverse agreement and global case splits
106(4)
4.2.1 Kashmiri
106(2)
4.2.2 Sahaptin
108(2)
4.3 Case assignment and cyclicity
110(7)
4.3.1 CASE features, case assignment, and impoverishment
114(3)
4.4 Analysis
117(28)
4.4.1 Global case splits on subject and object
117(9)
4.4.2 Global case splits and animacy
126(9)
4.4.3 Crossing the divide between direct and inverse
135(10)
4.5 Discussion and conclusions
145(6)
4.5.1 Other approaches to global case splits
145(3)
4.5.2 Functional heads and probes
148(1)
4.5.3 Conclusions
149(2)
5 Alignment in transitive clauses: case determining agreement
151(42)
5.1 Introduction
151(1)
5.2 Case, agreement, and Bobaljik's generalizations
152(5)
5.2.1 Hindi and Nepali
152(1)
5.2.2 Bobaljik's generalizations
153(2)
5.2.3 Marathi
155(2)
5.3 Analysis
157(34)
5.3.1 Theoretical assumptions
158(1)
5.3.2 Case and CASE features
159(2)
5.3.3 Deriving agreement in Hindi, Nepali, and Marathi
161(14)
5.3.4 Languages with two φ-probes
175(8)
5.3.5 Splits between one and two probes
183(4)
5.3.6 A language with three φ-probes: Kashmiri
187(4)
5.4 Conclusions
191(2)
6 A parameter hierarchy for agreement
193(8)
6.1 A hierarchical approach to parameters
193(1)
6.2 Cross-linguistic variation in DOM
194(5)
6.2.1 Modelling dependencies
196(3)
6.3 Conclusions: parameters of DOM?
199(2)
References 201(17)
Index 218
András Bárány studied general and Finno-Ugric linguistics in Vienna and Budapest before moving to the University of Cambridge, where he obtained his PhD in theoretical linguistics. He has since worked at the Research Institute for Linguistics of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences in Budapest, Hungary, and at the School of African and Oriental Studies in London.
Lisainfo e-raamatute kohta Lisainfo e-raamatute kohta
Püsilink: https://www.kriso.ee/db/97801925262052e.html
Märksõnad: