Series Editor's Preface |
|
xv | |
Prologue |
|
xvii | |
Author |
|
xxi | |
Introduction |
|
xxiii | |
Section I The Law Governing Terrorism Investigations |
|
|
1 Legal Definition of Terrorism |
|
|
3 | (22) |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
Legal Definitions of Terrorism |
|
|
3 | (11) |
|
UK Definition of Terrorism |
|
|
4 | (4) |
|
EU Definition of Terrorism |
|
|
8 | (2) |
|
Canadian Definition of Terrorism |
|
|
10 | (2) |
|
US Definition of Terrorism Investigation |
|
|
12 | (2) |
|
Defining and Ascertaining Evidence That Amounts to a Religious Cause |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
Why Ascertaining the Motivations of a Cause in the Definition Is Important |
|
|
14 | (2) |
|
What Is a Religious Cause? |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
Evidence of a Religious Cause |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
A Religious Cause in Collecting or Possessing Information That May Be Useful to a Terrorist |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
A Religious Cause in Distributing or Circulating Terrorist Publications |
|
|
17 | (4) |
|
Armed Conflict in the Name of a Religious Cause |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
Should a Religious Cause Be Included in the Statutory Definition of Terrorism? |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
Is a Wide Legal Definition of Terrorism Assisting Agencies in Identifying a Disproportionate Risk in Society? |
|
|
21 | (3) |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
2 Government Policies and Statutory Preventative Measures |
|
|
25 | (34) |
|
Government Policies Related to Preventing or Preempting Acts of Terrorism: The Risk Is Not Disproportionate, the Risk Is Real |
|
|
26 | (2) |
|
Examples of Statutory Preventative Measures |
|
|
28 | (3) |
|
Possessing and Providing Materials Supporting Terrorism |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
United Kingdom: Possessing, Collecting Information for Terrorist Purposes |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
Section 57 Terrorism Act 2000: Possession for Terrorist Purposes |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
Section 58: Collection of Information |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
Judicial Interpretation of Sections 57 and 58 Terrorism Act 2000 |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
United States: Providing Material Support to Terrorists |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
Summary of Statutory Preventative Measures |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
Proscribed Organizations/Listed Foreign Terrorist Organizations |
|
|
32 | (3) |
|
UK Proscribed Organizations (Section 3 and Schedule 2 Terrorism Act 2000) |
|
|
32 | (2) |
|
US Department of State Foreign Terrorist Organizations |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
Canada: Banned Terror Groups |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
Summary on Proscribed/Banned Groups |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
Quasi-Criminal Preventative Measures: Example of the UK's Terrorism Prevention and Investigative Measures Act 2011 |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
Legal Development of TPIMs |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
Overview of the Operation of TPIMs |
|
|
37 | (7) |
|
Terrorism-Related Activity (TRA) |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
Schedule 1 Measures That Can Be Imposed in a TPIM |
|
|
39 | (2) |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
The Controversy over TPIMs |
|
|
41 | (3) |
|
NSA, PRISM Project, Journalistic Material, and Schedule 7 Powers: A Case Study of a Terrorism Preventative Stop and Search Measure Used at the National Level in Response to an International Incident |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
Schedule 7 Terrorism Act 2000 Powers |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
Judicial Response to Schedule 7 Powers |
|
|
46 | (6) |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
No Requirement for Reasonable Suspicion |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
Search and Seizure of Property under Schedule 7: Can Journalistic Material Be Related to Terrorist Activities? |
|
|
49 | (3) |
|
Detention Periods and Review of Detention |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
Proportionality and the Interests of National Security or Individual Liberty |
|
|
53 | (2) |
|
Summary of the High Court's Decision in Miranda |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
|
56 | (3) |
|
3 Surveillance and International Terrorism Intelligence Exchange: Balancing the Interests of National Security and Individual Liberty |
|
|
59 | (20) |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
Surveillance Powers Used in Terrorism Investigations |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
Intelligence Exchange between the United States and the United Kingdom: The Role of Europol |
|
|
61 | (2) |
|
The Impact of the European Union's Treaty of Lisbon on Cooperation |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
The Snowden Affair, National Security Interests, and Protecting Individual Rights |
|
|
63 | (2) |
|
The Importance of the Snowden Documents to UK Authorities |
|
|
65 | (2) |
|
Balancing the Interests of National Security with Individual Rights: Democracies, Neo-Democracies, and the Legal Principle of Proportionality |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
Legal Challenges to US Surveillance Laws |
|
|
68 | (4) |
|
Court Decisions Pre-Snowden |
|
|
68 | (2) |
|
Court Decisions Post-Snowden |
|
|
70 | (2) |
|
|
72 | (3) |
|
UK Judiciary's Clashes with the European Court of Human Rights |
|
|
72 | (2) |
|
UK Appellate Courts Decisions That Changed Anti-Terror Laws |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
Issues Surrounding Control Orders and Blacklists |
|
|
75 | (2) |
|
Conclusion: The Balance between the Interests of National Security and Individuals' Liberty |
|
|
77 | (2) |
|
|
79 | (18) |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
Provisions Related to Funding Terrorism under the UK's Terrorism Legislation |
|
|
79 | (4) |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
Anti-Terrorism, Crime, and Security Act 2001 (ATCSA) |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
Counter-Terrorism Act of 2008 |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
Terrorism (United Nations Measures) Orders and Al Qaeda and Taliban (United Nations Measures) Orders |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
How the Orders Were Derived |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
The Disproportionate and Oppressive Nature of the Terrorism Order Rendering It Ultra Vires |
|
|
83 | (2) |
|
European Court of Justice's (ECJ) Decision Being Influential to the Supreme Court's Decision in H.M. Treasury v Mohammad Jabar Ahmed and Others |
|
|
85 | (2) |
|
UK's Terror Asset-Freezing Act of 2010 (TAFA) |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
The US Statutory Provision in Relation to the Funding of Terrorism |
|
|
88 | (3) |
|
Presidential Executive Order 13224 |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
Part III Patriot Act: International Money Laundering Abatement and Financial Anti-Terrorism Act 2001 |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
Judicial Response to Lack of Judicial Scrutiny of Asset-Freezing SCRs |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
|
92 | (5) |
Section II Investigating Terrorism |
|
|
5 Lack of Discretion in High Policing |
|
|
97 | (18) |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
|
97 | (2) |
|
|
99 | (2) |
|
The Dichotomy between Previous Police Research and This Study |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
Initial Action Taken in CTU Counterterrorist Investigations: It Is Ownership, Not Discretion |
|
|
102 | (2) |
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
CTU Operational Officers' Attitudes Toward the Law: Followed to the Letter or Just a Rough Guide? |
|
|
105 | (3) |
|
Terrorism Legislation: Extension of Power or Extension of Discretion? |
|
|
108 | (4) |
|
|
112 | (3) |
|
6 Radicalization of Terrorist Causes: A Study of the 32CSM/IRA Threat to UK Security |
|
|
115 | (28) |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
|
117 | (2) |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
Semi-Structured Interview |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
Background to the Research |
|
|
119 | (3) |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
Radicalization Process in Ireland |
|
|
122 | (14) |
|
|
122 | (3) |
|
Radicalization through Fundraising |
|
|
125 | (3) |
|
Radicalization: The Power of Language and Symbolism to Demonstrate Mutual Empathy |
|
|
128 | (4) |
|
Radicalization via the Internet |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
Recruitment to Causes via Social Media |
|
|
133 | (3) |
|
Loyalist Paramilitary Violence: Fueling and Legitimizing the Fire of 32CSM/IRA's Cause? |
|
|
136 | (2) |
|
Conclusion: Radicalizing Individuals in Britain Support to the 32CSM/IRA Cause |
|
|
138 | (5) |
|
Background to British Support for Irish Republican Groups |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
The 32CSM/IRA and British RFBs |
|
|
138 | (2) |
|
How Extortion and Murder Have Become a Romanticized 32CSM/IRA Cause |
|
|
140 | (3) |
|
7 Recruiting Informants in Counterterrorism Investigations: Is Loss of Integrity a Noble Cause? |
|
|
143 | (14) |
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
|
144 | (3) |
|
Police Recruitment of Informants |
|
|
147 | (2) |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
Research Subjects Interviewed and Sample Size |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
Turning Suspects into Informants |
|
|
150 | (3) |
|
Role Conflict and Police Officer Integrity |
|
|
153 | (3) |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
|
157 | (18) |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
Law or Policy in Handling Informants? |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
UK's Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
Policies on the Use of Informants in Other States |
|
|
159 | (4) |
|
|
159 | (2) |
|
|
161 | (2) |
|
Ethical Issues in Handling Informants |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
Motives and Incentives to Inform |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
Informants: The Necessary Evil |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
Ethical Handling of Informants |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
The 1968-1997 Irish Troubles: A Case Study in Unethical Police Handling of Informants |
|
|
166 | (2) |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
Immunity from Prosecution/Reduction in Sentence |
|
|
168 | (2) |
|
The UK's Serious Organized Crime and Police Act 2005 (SOCPA) |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
The US New Jersey Brimage Guidelines |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
Informant Witness Anonymity in Criminal Trials |
|
|
170 | (2) |
|
The UK's Coroners and Justice Act of 2009 |
|
|
170 | (1) |
|
Canada's Confidential Informant Privilege |
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
|
172 | (3) |
Conclusion |
|
175 | (6) |
Bibliography |
|
181 | (14) |
Index |
|
195 | |