List of Contributors |
|
xiii | |
Foreword |
|
xvii | |
Preface |
|
xix | |
1 Contemporary Protein Analysis by Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry |
|
1 | (10) |
|
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
1.2 Traveling-Wave Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
1.3 IM-MS and LC-IM-MS Analysis of Simple and Complex Mixtures |
|
|
2 | (5) |
|
1.3.1 Cross Section and Structure |
|
|
2 | (2) |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
|
8 | (3) |
2 High-Resolution Accurate Mass Orbitrap and Its Application in Protein Therapeutics Bioanalysis |
|
11 | (10) |
|
|
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
2.2 Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer and Its Challenges |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
2.3 High-Resolution Mass Spectrometers |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
2.4 Quantitation Modes on Q Exactive Hybrid Quadrupole Orbitrap |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
2.5 Protein Quantitation Approaches Using Q Exactive Hybrid Quadrupole Orbitrap |
|
|
14 | (2) |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
2.7 Other Factors That Impact LC-MS-based Quantitation |
|
|
16 | (2) |
|
2.7.1 Sample Extraction to Reduce Matrices |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
2.8 Conclusion and Perspectives of LC-HRMS in Regulated Bioanalysis |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
|
18 | (3) |
3 Current Methods for the Characterization of Posttranslational Modifications in Therapeutic Proteins Using Orbitrap Mass Spectrometry |
|
21 | (14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 | (2) |
|
3.2 Characterization of PTMs Using Higher-Energy Collision Dissociation |
|
|
23 | (3) |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
|
24 | (2) |
|
3.3 Application of Electron Transfer Dissociation to the Characterization of Labile PTMs |
|
|
26 | (5) |
|
3.3.1 Performing ETD Experiments in Orbitrap Instruments |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
3.3.2 Structure Elucidation of Glycopeptides Using Multiple Fragmentation Mechanisms in Orbitrap Instruments |
|
|
28 | (3) |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
|
32 | (3) |
4 Macro-to Micromolecular Quantitation of Proteins and Peptides by Mass Spectrometry |
|
35 | (10) |
|
|
|
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
4.2 Key Challenges of Peptide Bioanalysis |
|
|
36 | (2) |
|
4.2.1 Key Benefits of the LC/MS/MS Peptide Quantitation Workflow |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
4.3 Key Features of LC/MS/MS-Based Peptide Quantitation |
|
|
38 | (3) |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
4.3.2.2 Differential Mobility Spectrometry (DMS) |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
4.3.3 High-Resolution Accurate-Mass Spectrometry |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
4.4 Advantages of the Diversity of Mass Spectrometry Systems |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
4.5 Perspectives for the Future |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
|
42 | (3) |
5 Peptide and Protein Bioanalysis Using Integrated Column-to-Source Technology for High-Flow Nanospray |
|
45 | (10) |
|
|
|
5.1 Introduction-LC-MS Has Enabled the Field of Protein Biomarker Discovery |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
5.2 Integration of Miniaturized LC with Nanospray ESI-MS Is a Key for Success |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
5.3 Micro-and Nano-LC Are Well Suited for Quantitative Bioanalysis |
|
|
47 | (2) |
|
5.4 Demonstrating Packed-Emitter Columns Are Suitable for Bioanalysis |
|
|
49 | (2) |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
|
52 | (3) |
6 Targeting the Right Protein Isoform: Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomic Characterization of Alternative Splice Variants |
|
55 | (12) |
|
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
6.2 Alternative Splicing and Human Diseases |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
6.3 Identification of Splice Variant Proteins |
|
|
56 | (8) |
|
6.3.1 Global Profiling of Splicing Variant Proteins |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
6.3.2 Characterization of Relative Expression of Protein Splice Variants |
|
|
57 | (5) |
|
6.3.3 Quantitation of Splice Variants by MRM-MS |
|
|
62 | (2) |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
|
64 | (3) |
7 The Application of Immunoaffinity-Based Mass Spectrometry to Characterize Protein Biomarkers and Biotherapeutics |
|
67 | (24) |
|
|
|
|
67 | (2) |
|
7.1.1 The Importance of Protein Measurement |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
7.1.2 Ligand Binding Assays |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
7.1.3 The Introduction of Hybrid IA-MS Methods |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
7.2 Overview of IA-MS Methods |
|
|
69 | (5) |
|
7.2.1 Classification of IA-MS Methods |
|
|
69 | (2) |
|
7.2.2 Stable-Isotope-Labeled Internal Standards |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
7.2.4 Liquid Chromatography |
|
|
72 | (2) |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
7.3 IA-MS Applications-Biomarkers |
|
|
74 | (7) |
|
|
74 | (4) |
|
7.3.2 Protein Biomarkers-Anti-Protein Capture |
|
|
78 | (2) |
|
7.3.3 Protein Biomarkers-Anti-Peptide Capture |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
7.4 IA-MS Applications-Biotherapeutics |
|
|
81 | (3) |
|
7.4.1 Therapeutic Peptides |
|
|
81 | (2) |
|
7.4.2 Therapeutic Antibodies |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
7.4.3 Antibody-Drug Conjugates |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
|
85 | (6) |
8 Semiquantification and Isotyping of Antidrug Antibodies by lmmunocapture-LC/MS for Immunogenicity Assessment |
|
91 | (8) |
|
|
|
|
|
91 | (2) |
|
8.2 Multiplexing Direct Measurement of ADAs by Immunocapture-LC/MS for Immunogenicity Screening, Titering, and Isotyping |
|
|
93 | (2) |
|
8.3 Indirect Measurement of ADAs by Quantifying ADA Binding Components |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
8.4 Use of LC-MS to Assist in Method Development of Cell-Based Neutralizing Antibody Assays |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
8.5 Conclusion and Future Perspectives |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
|
97 | (2) |
9 Mass Spectrometry-Based Assay for High-Throughput and High-Sensitivity Biomarker Verification |
|
99 | (8) |
|
|
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
9.2 Sample Processing Strategies |
|
|
100 | (2) |
|
9.3 Advanced Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry Instrumentation |
|
|
102 | (3) |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
|
105 | (2) |
10 Monitoring Quality of Critical Reagents Used in Ligand Binding Assays with Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS) |
|
107 | (22) |
|
|
|
|
|
107 | (7) |
|
|
114 | (8) |
|
10.2.1 Case Study #1: Confirmation of Correct Reagent Construct Prior to Use in Development of an LBA Method |
|
|
114 | (2) |
|
10.2.2 Case Study #2: Monitoring the Integrity of the Reagent Cell Line Production System |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
10.2.3 Case Study #3: Investigation of the Loss of LBA Specificity During Clinical Development |
|
|
116 | (6) |
|
10.2.3.1 Prestudy Investigation |
|
|
116 | (3) |
|
10.2.3.2 In-Study Investigation |
|
|
119 | (3) |
|
10.2.4 Case Study #4: Monitoring the Incorporation Ratio of Conjugated Critical Reagent Used in LBAs |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
|
122 | (4) |
|
10.3.1 Keys to Reagent Management |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
10.3.2 Importance of LC-MS Characterization |
|
|
123 | (2) |
|
10.3.3 The Analytical Toolbox and a "Fit-for-Purpose" Approach for Reagent Management |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
|
126 | (3) |
11 Application of Liquid Chromatography-High Resolution Mass Spectrometry in the Quantification of Intact Proteins in Biological Fluids |
|
129 | (16) |
|
|
|
|
|
129 | (2) |
|
11.2 Workflows for Quantification of Proteins Using Full-Scan LC-HRMS |
|
|
131 | (2) |
|
11.2.1 Sample Preparation |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
11.2.1.1 Solid-Phase Extraction (SPE) |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
11.2.1.2 Affinity Enrichment |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
11.2.1.3 Depletion of High-Abundant Proteins |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
11.2.1.4 Solution Fractionation |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
11.2.1.5 Protein Precipitation for PEGylated Proteins |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
11.2.2.2 Full-Scan HRMS Data Acquisition and Analysis |
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
11.3 Internal Standard Strategy |
|
|
133 | (2) |
|
11.3.1 Stable Isotope Labeled Protein |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
11.4 Calibration and Quality Control (QC) Sample Strategy |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
11.5 Common Issues in Quantification of Proteins Using LC-HRMS |
|
|
135 | (2) |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
11.5.3 Specific Protein Binding |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
11.5.4 Posttranslational Modifications (PTMs) |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
11.6 Examples of LC-HRMS-Based Intact Protein Quantification |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
11.7 Conclusion and Future Perspectives |
|
|
138 | (2) |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
|
140 | (5) |
12 LC-MS/MS Bioanalytical Method Development Strategy for Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies in Preclinical Studies |
|
145 | (16) |
|
|
|
|
12.1 Introduction: LC-MS/MS Bioanalysis of Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
12.2 Highlights of Recent Method Development Strategies |
|
|
146 | (8) |
|
12.2.1 Strategy for Surrogate Peptide Selection and Optimization |
|
|
146 | (2) |
|
12.2.2 Sample Preparation |
|
|
148 | (4) |
|
12.2.2.1 Immunoaffinity-Based Sample Preparation |
|
|
148 | (3) |
|
12.2.2.2 Nonimmunoaffinity-Based Sample Preparation |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
12.2.3 Accelerated Trypsin Digestion |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
12.2.4 Internal Standard Selection |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
12.2.4.2 Cleavable Flanking SIL-Peptide IS |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
12.3 Case Studies of Preclinical Applications of LC-MS/MS for Monoclonal Antibody Bioanalysis |
|
|
154 | (2) |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
12.3.1.1 Key Analytical Method Features |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
|
155 | (6) |
|
12.3.2.1 Key Analytical Method Features |
|
|
155 | (1) |
|
12.4 Conclusion and Future Perspectives |
|
|
156 | (2) |
|
|
158 | (3) |
13 Generic Peptide Strategies for LC-MS/MS Bioanalysis of Human Monoclonal Antibody Drugs and Drug Candidates |
|
161 | (22) |
|
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
13.2 A Universal Peptide LC-MS/MS Assay for Bioanalysis of a Diversity of Human Monoclonal Antibodies and Fc Fusion Proteins in Animal Studies |
|
|
161 | (4) |
|
13.2.1 Identification of a Candidate Universal Surrogate Peptide to Enable Quantification of Human mAb and Fc Fusion Protein Drug Candidates |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
13.2.2 Application of an Exploratory Universal (Peptide 1) LC-MS/MS Assay to a Monkey Pharmacokinetic Study |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
13.2.3 Potential Applicability of a Peptide 1 Variant to Bioanalysis of Human IgG2-Based mAbs and Fc Fusion Proteins |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
13.2.4 Impact of Peptide 1 Asparagine Deamidation on Human mAb Quantification Can Be Mitigated |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
13.3 An Improved "Dual" Universal Peptide LC-MS/MS Assay for Bioanalysis of Human mAb Drug Candidates in Animal Studies |
|
|
165 | (5) |
|
13.3.1 Identification and Evaluation of "Dual" Universal Peptide LC-MS/MS Assay Candidates |
|
|
165 | (2) |
|
13.3.2 Quantitative Evaluation and Comparison of Light and Heavy Chain Dual Universal Peptide Candidates |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
13.3.3 Assessing the Level of Quantitative Agreement Between Peptide 1 and Peptide 2 in Assay Performance Evaluation Runs |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
13.3.4 Deployment of the Exploratory Dual Universal Peptide Assay in Support of a Monkey Pharmacokinetic Study |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
13.3.5 Considerations for Calibration Curve/QC Replicate Acceptance Criteria When a Dual Peptide Assay Is Employed |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
13.3.6 Interpreting and Reporting Study Sample Concentration Data Generated with a Dual Peptide Assay |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
13.3.7 Related Studies: Generic LC-MS/MS Assays for Human mAb Bioanalysis in Animal Studies |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
13.4 Extending the Universal Peptide Assay Concept to Human mAb Bioanalysis in Human Studies |
|
|
170 | (3) |
|
13.4.1 Potential Expansion of the Universal LC-MS/MS Assay Concept into Human Studies |
|
|
170 | (1) |
|
13.4.2 Development and Evaluation of an Exploratory Universal IgG4 Clinical LC-MS/MS Assay |
|
|
171 | (2) |
|
13.4.3 Evaluation of the Impact of Anti-mAb Antibodies on Exploratory Universal IgG4 LC-MS/MS Assay Performance |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
13.5 Internal Standard Options for Generic Peptide LC-MS/MS Assays |
|
|
173 | (2) |
|
13.5.1 Stable Isotopically Labeled Peptide Internal Standards |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
13.5.2 Stable Isotopically Labeled Protein Internal Standards |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
13.5.3 "Flanked" Stable Isotopically Labeled Peptide Internal Standards |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
13.6 Sample Preparation Strategies for Generic Peptide LC-MS/MS Assays |
|
|
175 | (2) |
|
13.6.1 Direct Digestion, Pellet Digestion, and Solid-Phase Extraction |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
13.6.3 Additional Sample Preparation Approaches for Generic Peptide LC-MS/MS Assays |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
13.7 Limitations of Generic Peptide LC-MS/MS Assays |
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
|
178 | (1) |
|
|
178 | (1) |
|
|
178 | (5) |
14 Mass Spectrometry-Based Methodologies for Pharmacokinetic Characterization of Antibody Drug Conjugate Candidates During Drug Development |
|
183 | (20) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183 | (1) |
|
|
183 | (3) |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
14.2.4 Unique Bioanalytical Challenges |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
14.3 Mass Spectrometry Measurement for DAR Distribution of Circulating ADCs |
|
|
186 | (3) |
|
14.3.1 Immunocapture of ADCs from Plasma or Serum |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
14.3.2 Deglycosylation for Captured ADCs |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
14.3.3 Mass Spectrometry Measurement for DAR Distribution of Circulating ADCs |
|
|
188 | (1) |
|
14.4 Total Antibody Quantitation by Ligand Binding or LC-MS/MS |
|
|
189 | (4) |
|
14.4.1 Ligand Binding Assay |
|
|
189 | (1) |
|
14.4.2 LC-MS/MS Assay for Total Antibody Quantitation |
|
|
190 | (2) |
|
14.4.2.1 Predigestion Treatment |
|
|
190 | (1) |
|
14.4.2.2 Enzymatic Digestion |
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
14.4.2.3 Postdigestion Treatment |
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
14.4.2.4 LC-MS/MS Analysis |
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
14.4.3 Ligand Binding versus LC-MS/MS Assays |
|
|
192 | (1) |
|
14.5 Total Conjugated Drug Quantitation by Ligand Binding or LC-MS/MS |
|
|
193 | (3) |
|
14.5.1 Ligand Binding Assays for ADC Quantitation |
|
|
193 | (1) |
|
14.5.1.1 DAR-Sensitive Total Conjugated Drug Assay |
|
|
193 | (1) |
|
14.5.1.2 DAR-Insensitive Total Conjugated Antibody Assay |
|
|
193 | (1) |
|
14.5.2 LC-MS/MS for the Total Conjugated Drug Quantitation |
|
|
194 | (1) |
|
14.5.2.1 Predigestion Treatment |
|
|
194 | (1) |
|
14.5.2.2 Enzymatic or Chemical Digestion |
|
|
194 | (1) |
|
14.5.2.3 Postdigestion Treatment |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
14.5.2.4 LC-MS/MS Analysis |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
14.5.3 Ligand Binding versus LC-MS/MS |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
14.6 Catabolite Quantitation by LC-MS/MS |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
14.6.1 Sample Preparation |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
14.7 Preclinical and Clinical Pharmacokinetic Support |
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
14.8 Conclusion and Future Perspectives |
|
|
198 | (1) |
|
|
198 | (5) |
15 Sample Preparation Strategies for LC-MS Bioanalysis of Proteins |
|
203 | (18) |
|
|
|
|
203 | (2) |
|
15.2 Sample Preparation Strategies to Improve Assay Sensitivity |
|
|
205 | (8) |
|
15.2.1 Protein Precipitation |
|
|
205 | (1) |
|
15.2.2 Solid-Phase Extraction |
|
|
205 | (1) |
|
|
206 | (1) |
|
15.2.4 Depletion of High-Abundance Proteins |
|
|
207 | (1) |
|
15.2.5 Immunoaffinity Purification |
|
|
208 | (3) |
|
15.2.5.1 Immunocapture of a Specific Peptide |
|
|
208 | (1) |
|
15.2.5.2 Immunocapture of a Specific Protein |
|
|
208 | (2) |
|
15.2.5.3 Generic Immunocapture |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
15.2.6 Online Sample Preparation |
|
|
211 | (2) |
|
15.3 Sample Preparation Strategies to Differentiate Free, Total, and ADA-Bound Proteins |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
15.4 Sample Preparation Strategies to Overcome Interference from Antidrug Antibodies or Soluble Target |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
15.5 Protein Digestion Strategies |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
|
216 | (5) |
16 Characterization of Protein Therapeutics by Mass Spectrometry |
|
221 | (19) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221 | (1) |
|
16.2 Variants Associated with Cysteine/Disulfide Bonds in Protein Therapeutics |
|
|
221 | (4) |
|
16.2.1 Thiolation Isoforms |
|
|
222 | (1) |
|
16.2.2 Disulfide Isoforms |
|
|
222 | (2) |
|
|
224 | (1) |
|
16.2.4 Thioether/Trisulfide Bond |
|
|
224 | (1) |
|
16.2.5 Disulfide Bond in Antibody Drug Conjugates |
|
|
224 | (1) |
|
16.3 N-C-Terminal Variants |
|
|
225 | (1) |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
|
226 | (2) |
|
16.5.1 Methionine Oxidation |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
16.5.2 Metal-Catalyzed Oxidation (MCO) |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
|
228 | (1) |
|
16.5.5 Effect of Sequence and Structure on Deamidation |
|
|
228 | (1) |
|
|
228 | (2) |
|
|
230 | (2) |
|
|
232 | (8) |
|
16.8.1 Glycoprotein Structure |
|
|
232 | (3) |
|
16.8.2 Intact Glycoprotein Analysis |
|
|
235 | (2) |
|
16.8.3 Glycopeptide Analysis |
|
|
237 | (1) |
|
16.8.4 Tandem MS of Glycopeptides |
|
|
237 | (1) |
|
16.8.5 Free Glycan Analysis |
|
|
238 | (1) |
|
16.8.6 Release of Glycans from Glycoproteins |
|
|
238 | (1) |
|
16.8.7 Detailed Sequence and Linkage Analysis of Glycans |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
|
240 | (1) |
References |
|
240 | (11) |
Index |
|
251 | |