Acknowledgements |
|
viii | |
|
|
1 | (12) |
|
2 The Use of Force and the Scope for Dynamic Development |
|
|
13 | (24) |
|
|
13 | (2) |
|
2.2 Dynamic Interpretation of the UN Charter Rules on the Use of Force |
|
|
15 | (11) |
|
2.2.1 The UN Charter Rules and Customary International Law |
|
|
19 | (2) |
|
2.2.2 Contentious Issues in the Interpretation of Article 2(4) UN Charter |
|
|
21 | (5) |
|
2.3 Actors within the Interpretation of the UN Charter Rules |
|
|
26 | (7) |
|
2.4 Covert Operations and the Development of Jus ad Bellum |
|
|
33 | (2) |
|
|
35 | (2) |
|
3 Customary International Law and the Requirement of Publicity |
|
|
37 | (51) |
|
|
37 | (3) |
|
3.2 Customary International Law |
|
|
40 | (16) |
|
3.2.1 Addictive Addition: State Practice and Opinio Juris |
|
|
40 | (8) |
|
3.2.2 Alternative Approach: The Turn to Normativity |
|
|
48 | (3) |
|
3.2.3 Silence and Acquiescence |
|
|
51 | (5) |
|
3.3 The Requirement of Publicity |
|
|
56 | (14) |
|
3.3.1 Positioning Publicity within International Law |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
3.3.1.1 `Public' and `Secret' Agreements: Creating the In- and Outside of International Law |
|
|
56 | (3) |
|
3.3.2 Publicity in Contemporary Debates on Customary International Law |
|
|
59 | (11) |
|
3.4 Justifications, Acknowledgements, and Public Knowledge |
|
|
70 | (8) |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
3.4.1.1 Necessity of Justifications for Physical Acts |
|
|
70 | (2) |
|
3.4.1.2 The Nature of Justifications |
|
|
72 | (2) |
|
|
74 | (2) |
|
3.4.3 Public Knowledge of Acts in the Absence of Acknowledgemen and Justifications |
|
|
76 | (2) |
|
3.5 Different Levels of Covertness and Publicity |
|
|
78 | (9) |
|
3.5.1 Communication by the Acting State |
|
|
79 | (2) |
|
|
81 | (6) |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
4 Quasi-Covert Operations and the Identification of Claims |
|
|
88 | (42) |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
4.2 Delayed Acknowledgements |
|
|
89 | (3) |
|
4.2.1 Delayed Acknowledgement of Completed Operations |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
4.2.2 Delayed Acknowledgement of Ongoing Operations |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
4.3 Hypothetical Justifications |
|
|
92 | (2) |
|
4.4 Partial Acknowledgements |
|
|
94 | (3) |
|
4.5 Illustration: The United States Drone Strikes in Pakistan |
|
|
97 | (32) |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
4.5.2 The Road towards Transparency |
|
|
99 | (5) |
|
4.5.3 Reactions to the Strikes and the Justifications |
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
4.5.3.1 States and International Governmental Organisations |
|
|
105 | (3) |
|
4.5.3.2 Academic Commentary |
|
|
108 | (3) |
|
4.5.4 United States Drone Strikes and the Development of the Jus ad Bellum |
|
|
111 | (2) |
|
4.5.4.1 United States Drone Strikes and the Right to Use Self-Defence against Non-State Actors |
|
|
113 | (10) |
|
4.5.4.2 United States Drone Strikes and Temporality of Self-Defence |
|
|
123 | (6) |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
5 Unacknowledged Operations |
|
|
130 | (32) |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
5.2 Different Levels of Publicity of Unacknowledged Acts |
|
|
131 | (10) |
|
5.2.1 Unacknowledged Operations Triggering Reactions by Other States |
|
|
132 | (5) |
|
5.2.2 Publicly Known, but Unacknowledged, Acts to Which States Remain Silent |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
5.2.2.1 Acquiescence to Unacknowledged Acts |
|
|
137 | (4) |
|
5.2.2.2 Public Debate and Interpretation of the Charter Rules |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
5.3 Illustration: Cyberattacks |
|
|
141 | (18) |
|
5.3.1 Cyberattacks against Estonia and Iran |
|
|
143 | (4) |
|
5.3.2 Cyberattacks and the Definition of `Force' |
|
|
147 | (4) |
|
5.3.3 Attribution of Responsibility for Cyberattacks |
|
|
151 | (3) |
|
5.3.4 Cyberattacks and the Right to Self-Defence |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
5.3.4.1 Cyberattacks and the Definition of `Armed Attack' |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
5.3.4.2 Cyberattacks and Temporality |
|
|
155 | (2) |
|
5.3.4.3 Cyberattacks and Necessity |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
5.3.4.4 Cyberattacks and Proportionality |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
5.4 Cyberattacks and the Dynamic Interpretation of Jus ad Helium |
|
|
159 | (1) |
|
|
160 | (2) |
|
|
162 | (7) |
Index |
|
169 | |