Acknowledgements |
|
ix | |
List of abbreviations |
|
xi | |
Chapter 1 Introduction |
|
1 | (42) |
|
1.1 What is diachronic typology? |
|
|
2 | (5) |
|
1.1.1 Typology as a tool for investigating language change |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
1.1.2 Historical linguistics as a tool for investigating typology |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
1.1.3 'What's where why' becomes 'what's where when and why' |
|
|
4 | (3) |
|
|
7 | (6) |
|
1.2.1 Demonstrating the methods of diachronic typology |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
1.2.2 Why use relative clauses as a case study? Some methodological considerations |
|
|
7 | (6) |
|
1.3 A brief introduction to the relative clause |
|
|
13 | (30) |
|
1.3.1 What is a relative clause? |
|
|
13 | (3) |
|
1.3.2 The types and subtypes of relative clauses |
|
|
16 | (8) |
|
1.3.3 Relative clause markers |
|
|
24 | (5) |
|
1.3.4 Relative clauses around the world |
|
|
29 | (3) |
|
1.3.5 Relative clauses through time |
|
|
32 | (11) |
Chapter 2 Sources and extension of grammatical markers |
|
43 | (90) |
|
2.1 Types of relationship between grammatical markers |
|
|
43 | (5) |
|
2.2 Case studies of sources and extensions |
|
|
48 | (82) |
|
|
48 | (11) |
|
2.2.2 Classifiers and generic nouns |
|
|
59 | (7) |
|
|
66 | (5) |
|
|
71 | (18) |
|
|
89 | (8) |
|
|
97 | (11) |
|
|
108 | (7) |
|
2.2.8 General subordination |
|
|
115 | (2) |
|
|
117 | (4) |
|
|
121 | (2) |
|
2.2.11 Less well-documented extensions |
|
|
123 | (7) |
|
2.3 Conclusions: What came from where, when and why? |
|
|
130 | (3) |
Chapter 3 Other types of relationship between grammatical markers |
|
133 | (30) |
|
3.1 Redistribution of markers |
|
|
133 | (11) |
|
|
144 | (8) |
|
3.2.1 Loss and general typological change |
|
|
145 | (7) |
|
|
152 | (6) |
|
3.3.1 From invariant complementiser to inflecting pronoun and vice versa |
|
|
153 | (2) |
|
3.3.2 From free-standing marker to verb affix |
|
|
155 | (3) |
|
3.4 Grammatical markers: What's where when and why? |
|
|
158 | (5) |
|
3.4.1 Relative clause markers in space and time |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
3.4.2 Relative clause markers and language contact |
|
|
159 | (1) |
|
3.4.3 Implications for the methods of diachronic typology |
|
|
160 | (3) |
Chapter 4 Syntactic change in the development of RC constructions |
|
163 | (36) |
|
4.1 The origins of embedded clauses |
|
|
165 | (4) |
|
4.2 Deranking and balancing of verb forms |
|
|
169 | (10) |
|
|
179 | (7) |
|
4.4 Change in clause order |
|
|
186 | (7) |
|
4.4.1 Relative clauses that follow the head |
|
|
188 | (4) |
|
4.4.2 Relative clauses that precede the head |
|
|
192 | (1) |
|
4.5 Syntax: What's where, when and why? |
|
|
193 | (6) |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
4.5.2 Implications for the methods of diachronic typology |
|
|
196 | (3) |
Chapter 5 Relevant factors in language change: The importance of contact |
|
199 | (30) |
|
5.1 'Basic word order' as a factor in relative clause change |
|
|
199 | (8) |
|
5.2 Other word order 'harmonies' as a factor in relative clause change |
|
|
207 | (4) |
|
5.3 Embedding as a factor in relative clause change |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
5.4 The relationship between grammatical marker type and syntactic change |
|
|
212 | (4) |
|
5.5 The relevance of language family affiliation to relative clause change |
|
|
216 | (2) |
|
5.6 Language contact and relative clause change |
|
|
218 | (8) |
|
5.7 The relative influence of internal and external factors |
|
|
226 | (3) |
Chapter 6 Conclusions |
|
229 | (18) |
|
6.1 What's where when? Mapping relative clauses in three dimensions |
|
|
229 | (5) |
|
6.2 ... and why: Processes and mechanisms |
|
|
234 | (1) |
|
|
235 | (2) |
|
6.4 Implications for the structure of relative clauses |
|
|
237 | (5) |
|
6.5 Implications for taxonomies of relative clause types |
|
|
242 | (2) |
|
6.6 The methods of diachronic typology |
|
|
244 | (3) |
References |
|
247 | (16) |
Appendices |
|
263 | (12) |
Language Index |
|
275 | (4) |
Subject Index |
|
279 | |