| Foreword: The Honourable Robert S. French AC, Chief Justice of Australia 2008--2017 |
|
x | |
| Acknowledgements |
|
xvi | |
|
1 A sabbath breaker in the stocks |
|
|
1 | (8) |
|
2 Arguing for a religious character to the Australian Constitution |
|
|
9 | (11) |
|
A vague craving for official recognition of the authority of God |
|
|
9 | (3) |
|
The New South Wales Council of Churches and the campaign for constitutional recognition of God |
|
|
12 | (3) |
|
The church leaders' motives |
|
|
15 | (5) |
|
3 Arguing against a religious character to the Australian Constitution |
|
|
20 | (12) |
|
The Seventh Day Adventists sound a warning |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
The Seventh Day Adventist campaign against constitutional recognition of God |
|
|
21 | (2) |
|
Familiar harpings from America |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
The Seventh Day Adventists' legal reasoning |
|
|
24 | (4) |
|
The Seventh Day Adventists' theological reasoning |
|
|
28 | (4) |
|
4 A constitutional recognition of God |
|
|
32 | (16) |
|
Leaving prayer to its proper place |
|
|
32 | (3) |
|
Time to bombard Parliament with petitions |
|
|
35 | (2) |
|
The colonial parliaments endorse constitutional recognition of God |
|
|
37 | (5) |
|
The Federal Convention acquiesces |
|
|
42 | (2) |
|
What do the religious words of the preamble mean? |
|
|
44 | (4) |
|
5 A constitutional prohibition against religious laws |
|
|
48 | (11) |
|
Higgins alleges ulterior motives |
|
|
48 | (3) |
|
The first debate in the Federal Convention |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
The second debate in the Federal Convention |
|
|
52 | (6) |
|
The Federal Convention agrees to a constitutional prohibition on religious laws |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
6 The argument for section 116 |
|
|
59 | (19) |
|
The standard account of Higgins' argument for section 116 |
|
|
59 | (2) |
|
|
|
61 | (2) |
|
What was Church of the Holy Trinity really about? |
|
|
63 | (3) |
|
The Sunday Closing statute |
|
|
66 | (2) |
|
|
|
68 | (4) |
|
Higgins' argument reconsidered |
|
|
72 | (3) |
|
Section 116 as an exception to express powers |
|
|
75 | (3) |
|
7 The language of section 116 |
|
|
78 | (20) |
|
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
Andrew Inglis Clark's draft Constitution |
|
|
79 | (2) |
|
Clark's provisions at the 1891 Convention |
|
|
81 | (3) |
|
The Seventh Day Adventists' petitions |
|
|
84 | (2) |
|
The Federal Convention's Adelaide language |
|
|
86 | (2) |
|
The Federal Convention's February language |
|
|
88 | (4) |
|
The Federal Convention's March language |
|
|
92 | (4) |
|
The Drafting Committee's final language |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
The discordance between section 116's purpose and language |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
8 The original understanding of section 116 |
|
|
98 | (16) |
|
|
|
98 | (2) |
|
|
|
100 | (3) |
|
|
|
103 | (2) |
|
|
|
105 | (2) |
|
|
|
107 | (2) |
|
|
|
109 | (2) |
|
The Federal Convention was not concerned with precise meanings |
|
|
111 | (3) |
|
9 Section 116 as a safeguard against religious intolerance |
|
|
114 | (16) |
|
What is the point of section 116? |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
|
|
115 | (3) |
|
The safeguard against religious intolerance theory |
|
|
118 | (3) |
|
Comparing the two theories |
|
|
121 | (2) |
|
Why the neutrality theory is wrong |
|
|
123 | (5) |
|
Why the safeguard against intolerance theory is right |
|
|
128 | (2) |
|
10 H V Evatt's attempts to amend section 116 in the 1940s |
|
|
130 | (13) |
|
Evatt's determination to expand section 116 |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
From shield to sword: the 1942 Referendum Bill |
|
|
130 | (3) |
|
The sword reverts to a shield: the 1942 Convention |
|
|
133 | (4) |
|
Evatt tries and fails again: the 1944 referendum |
|
|
137 | (6) |
|
11 Post-war attempts to amend section 116 |
|
|
143 | (13) |
|
The Australian Constitutional Convention of 1973--1985 |
|
|
143 | (2) |
|
Whitlam's attempt to extend section 116 to the States |
|
|
145 | (3) |
|
The Constitutional Commission of 1985--1988 |
|
|
148 | (4) |
|
The 1988 rights and freedoms referendum |
|
|
152 | (4) |
|
12 The future of section 116 |
|
|
156 | (11) |
|
How does section 116 provide a safeguard against religious intolerance? |
|
|
156 | (2) |
|
Section 116 is concerned with the practical operation of laws |
|
|
158 | (3) |
|
Section 116 should not be interpreted narrowly |
|
|
161 | (2) |
|
Section 116 should be interpreted to avoid religious intolerance on the part of the Commonwealth |
|
|
163 | (2) |
|
The future of Section 116 |
|
|
165 | (2) |
| Bibliography |
|
167 | (9) |
| Index |
|
176 | |