Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Routledge Handbook of Argumentation Theory

Edited by (University of Lethbridge, Canada), Edited by (Vanderbilt University, USA.), Edited by (Northeastern Illinois University, USA.)
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Formaat - EPUB+DRM
  • Hind: 67,59 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • See e-raamat on mõeldud ainult isiklikuks kasutamiseks. E-raamatuid ei saa tagastada.
Routledge Handbook of Argumentation TheorySuurem pilt

DRM piirangud

  • Kopeerimine (copy/paste):

    ei ole lubatud

  • Printimine:

    ei ole lubatud

  • Kasutamine:

    Digitaalõiguste kaitse (DRM)
    Kirjastus on väljastanud selle e-raamatu krüpteeritud kujul, mis tähendab, et selle lugemiseks peate installeerima spetsiaalse tarkvara. Samuti peate looma endale  Adobe ID Rohkem infot siin. E-raamatut saab lugeda 1 kasutaja ning alla laadida kuni 6'de seadmesse (kõik autoriseeritud sama Adobe ID-ga).

    Vajalik tarkvara
    Mobiilsetes seadmetes (telefon või tahvelarvuti) lugemiseks peate installeerima selle tasuta rakenduse: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    PC või Mac seadmes lugemiseks peate installima Adobe Digital Editionsi (Seeon tasuta rakendus spetsiaalselt e-raamatute lugemiseks. Seda ei tohi segamini ajada Adober Reader'iga, mis tõenäoliselt on juba teie arvutisse installeeritud )

    Seda e-raamatut ei saa lugeda Amazon Kindle's. 

"The Routledge Handbook of Argumentation Theory offers 43 chapters--written specifically for this volume by a team of leading, international scholars--that survey a wide spectrum of research on the nature, purpose, and promise of argument and the associated practice of argumentation. Each chapter provides up-to-date research tools and statements designed to help readers understand and engage with the field's main ideas and problems as they are studied and practiced today. The book is split into two parts: Part One covers orienting approaches in argumentation studies. Part Two focuses on the main debates in argumentation theory.The Handbook illustrates how different disciplines contribute to argumentation theory, integrating contributions from logic, epistemology, social psychology, political science, communication, rhetoric, and other fields. This volume thus provides researchers and students with a picture of the diversity and depth to the work in argumentation theory today. Throughout, it clarifies complex questions and methods in this evolving field of study. And references at the end of chapter and a comprehensive index at the back of the book provide readers with central resources for further work in this important area of research. Scott Aikin is an associate professor of philosophy at Vanderbilt University, USA. He specializes in epistemology, argumentation theory, and ancient philosophy. He is the author of Epistemology and the Regress Problem (2011) and Straw Man Arguments, with John Casey (2022). John Casey is Professor of Philosophy at Northeastern Illinois University in Chicago, Illinois, USA. He specializes in the history of medieval philosophy and argumentation theory. He is the author of Straw Man Arguments (in 2022 with Scott Aikin), among other articles on argumentative adversariality, autonomy, informal fallacies, and meta-argument. Katharina Stevens is an Associate Professor of Philosophy and an Argumentation Theorist working at the University of Lethbridge in Alberta, Canada. She is aco-editor of the journal Informal Logic and a co-director of the University of Lethbridge's Critical Thinking and Citizen Engagement Lab. She publishes on Argumentation Theory, especially the Ethics of Argumentation and Precedent. She is also the author of The Ethics of Argumentation (online first, 2026), Routledge"-- Provided by publisher.

The Routledge Handbook of Argumentation Theory offers 43 chapters--written specifically for this volume by a team of leading, international scholars--that survey a wide spectrum of research on the nature, purpose, and promise of argument and the associated practice of argumentation.



The Routledge Handbook of Argumentation Theory offers 43 chapters--written specifically for this volume by a team of leading, international scholars--that survey a wide spectrum of research on the nature, purpose, and promise of argument and the associated practice of argumentation. Each chapter provides up-to-date research tools and statements designed to help readers understand and engage with the field’s main ideas and problems as they are studied and practiced today.

The book is split into two parts:

  • Part One covers orienting approaches in argumentation studies.
  • Part Two focuses on the main debates in argumentation theory.

The Handbook illustrates how different disciplines contribute to argumentation theory, integrating contributions from logic, epistemology, social psychology, political science, communication, rhetoric, and other fields. This volume thus provides researchers and students with a picture of the diversity and depth to the work in argumentation theory today. Throughout, it clarifies complex questions and methods in this evolving field of study. And references at the end of chapter and a comprehensive index at the back of the book provide readers with central resources for further work in this important area of research.

Arvustused

Leading scholars present the key approaches and debates shaping argumentation theory today. By examining the current state of research and offering their own reasoned perspectives, they show how the field thrives at the intersection of philosophy, communication, and rhetoric. This handbook serves as a guide for newcomers and marks an important advance in the discipline.

-- Jan Albert van Laar, Professor of Philosophy at University of Groningen, Netherlands.

The Routledge Handbook of Argumentation Theory is an indispensable guide to the interdisciplinary study of argumentation. It features a representative selection of senior scholars and emerging voices, who are mapping current debates while also charting new directions. The Handbook highlights the theoretical, empirical, and ethical stakes of argument in our time, addressing tensions between logic and rhetoric, cooperation and conflict, normative standards and practice. Rich in insight and range, it offers students, educators, and researchers a clear entry point into ongoing debates as well as a compelling invitation to further extend and refine the study of argumentation.

-- Jean Wagemans, Professor of Cognition, Communication, and Argumentation, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Introduction Part I: Organizing Approaches in Argumentation Theory
1.
Landmarks in the History of Argumentation Theory
2. The Concept of
Argumentation
3. The Deductivist Approach to Argument Evaluation
4. The
Rhetorical Perspective on Argumentation
5. The Epistemic/Epistemological
Theory of Argument
6. The Pragma-Dialectical Approach to Argumentation
7.
Normative Pragmatic Approaches to Argumentation
8. Psychology and Argument
9.
The Informal Logic Approach to Argumentation
10. Contemporary Dialectical
Theories of Argumentation
11. The Virtue Approach to Argument
12.
Argumentation Design
13. Modes, Coalescence and Argument
14. The Linguistic
Normative Model of Argumentation (LNMA)
15. Intercultural Argumentation
16.
The Language and Argumentation Interface
17. Experimental Approaches to
Argumentation Part II: Developing Debates in Argumentation Theory
18.
Argumentation Schemes
19. Charity and Argument Reconstruction
20. Critical
Thinking, Argumentation, and Critical Thinking Education
21. The Ethics of
Argumentation
22. About Fallacies
23. The Problem of Adversarial Argument
24.
Argumentation and Deep Disagreements
25. Feminism and Argumentation
26.
Arguing with Pictures
27. Ongoing Inquiry into Analogical Arguments
28.
Argument and Narrative
29. Legal Argumentation
30. Emotions and Argumentation
31. Political Argumentation
32. Political Disagreement, Epistemic Autonomy,
and Epistemic Interdependence
33. Nommo and the Essence of African American
Argumentation
34. Is argumentation knowledge-conducive?
35. Media
argumentation and argumentation in the media
36. Meta-argumentation
37. A
Pun, a Joke, and a Riddle Walk into an Argument
38. Multimodal Argumentation
39. What is the Burden of Proof, and Who Bears It?
40. Unlocking Unfounded
Criticisms of the Nyya Account of the Form of a Good Argument
41. Munara
and Islamic Traditions of Argument
42. Argumentation and its theorizing in
ancient China
43. Argumentation & Natural Language Processing
Scott Aikin is Associate Professor of Philosophy at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN. He specializes in epistemology, argumentation theory, and ancient philosophy. He is the author of Epistemology and the Regress Problem (2011) and Straw Man Arguments, with John Casey (2022).

John Casey is Professor of Philosophy at Northeastern Illinois University in Chicago, IL. He specializes in the history of medieval philosophy and argumentation theory. He is the author of Straw Man Arguments (in 2022 with Scott Aikin), among other articles on argumentative adversariality, autonomy, informal fallacies, and meta-argument.

Katharina Stevens is Associate Professor of Philosophy and an Argumentation Theorist working at the University of Lethbridge in Alberta, Canada. She is a co-editor of the journal Informal Logic and a co-director of the University of Lethbridge's Critical Thinking and Citizen Engagement Lab. She publishes on Argumentation Theory, especially the Ethics of Argumentation and Precedent. She is also the author of The Ethics of Argumentation (2026).
Lisainfo e-raamatute kohta Lisainfo e-raamatute kohta
Püsilink: https://www.kriso.ee/db/97810406166286e.html
Märksõnad:
Ei ole sisse logitud.