Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Standard of Review before the International Court of Justice: Between Principle and Pragmatism

(University of Münster, Germany)
  • Formaat - PDF+DRM
  • Hind: 49,13 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • See e-raamat on mõeldud ainult isiklikuks kasutamiseks. E-raamatuid ei saa tagastada.

DRM piirangud

  • Kopeerimine (copy/paste):

    ei ole lubatud

  • Printimine:

    ei ole lubatud

  • Kasutamine:

    Digitaalõiguste kaitse (DRM)
    Kirjastus on väljastanud selle e-raamatu krüpteeritud kujul, mis tähendab, et selle lugemiseks peate installeerima spetsiaalse tarkvara. Samuti peate looma endale  Adobe ID Rohkem infot siin. E-raamatut saab lugeda 1 kasutaja ning alla laadida kuni 6'de seadmesse (kõik autoriseeritud sama Adobe ID-ga).

    Vajalik tarkvara
    Mobiilsetes seadmetes (telefon või tahvelarvuti) lugemiseks peate installeerima selle tasuta rakenduse: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    PC või Mac seadmes lugemiseks peate installima Adobe Digital Editionsi (Seeon tasuta rakendus spetsiaalselt e-raamatute lugemiseks. Seda ei tohi segamini ajada Adober Reader'iga, mis tõenäoliselt on juba teie arvutisse installeeritud )

    Seda e-raamatut ei saa lugeda Amazon Kindle's. 

"This book examines how the International Court of Justice (ICJ) reviews State behaviour through the prism of the standard of review. It develops a rationale to support the ICJ's application of deferential standards of review as a judicial avoidance technique, based on strategic considerations. It then empirically assess all 31 decisions of the Court in which the standard of review was at issue, showing how the Court determines that standard, and answering the question of whether it varies its review intensity strategically. The book will be beneficial to all scholars of the Court and those interested in judicial strategy"--

This book examines how the International Court of Justice (ICJ) reviews State behaviour through the prism of the standard of review.

It develops a novel rationale to support the ICJ's application of deferential standards of review as a judicial avoidance technique, based on strategic considerations. It then goes on to empirically assess all 31 decisions of the Court in which the standard of review was at issue, showing how the Court determines that standard, and answering the question of whether it varies its review intensity strategically.

As a result, the book's original contribution is two-fold: establishing a new rationale for judicial deference (that can be applied to all international courts and tribunals); and providing the first comprehensive, empirical analysis of the ICJ's standards of review. It will be beneficial to all scholars of the Court and those interested in judicial strategy.

Muu info

Provides an innovative rationale to support the International Court of Justices application of deferential standards when reviewing the behaviour of States.

I. Introduction
II. Old Wine in New Skins?
III. Something New under the Sun: Standards of Review as a Judicial Avoidance Technique
IV. The Most Lenient Standard of Review: Absence of Judicial Oversight
V. A Lenient Standard of Review: The Good Faith Standard
VI. A Somewhat Lenient Standard of Review: The Reasonableness Standard
VII. The Strictest Standard of Review: The De Novo Standard
VIII. Conclusion: The ICJ's Relatively Strict, Yet Strategic Approach towards the Standard of Review Question

Felix Fouchard is Research Associate at the Chair for Public Law, International Law and European Union Law at the University of Münster, Germany.