|
|
xv | |
|
|
xix | |
Acknowledgments |
|
xxiii | |
|
Introduction and Overview |
|
|
1 | (20) |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
The Roles of Spatial Statistics in Public Health and Other Fields |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
Limitations Associated with the Visualization of Spatial Data |
|
|
3 | (6) |
|
Visual Assessment of Clustering Tendency |
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
What to Map: Mapping Rates versus Mapping p-Values |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
Example 1: Sudden Infant Death Syndrome in North Carolina |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
Example 2: Breast Cancer in the Northeastern United States |
|
|
7 | (2) |
|
Some Fundamental Concepts and Distinctions |
|
|
9 | (2) |
|
Descriptive versus Inferential, and Exploratory versus Confirmatory, Spatial Statistics |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
Types of Tests for Clustering |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
Software Resources and Sample Data |
|
|
13 | (8) |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
Breast Cancer Mortality in the Northeastern United States |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
Prostate Cancer Mortality in the United States |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
Sudden Infant Death Syndrome in North Carolina |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
Leukemia in Central New York State |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
Leukemia and Lymphoma Case-Control Data in England |
|
|
16 | (2) |
|
Low Birthweight in California |
|
|
18 | (3) |
|
Introductory Spatial Statistics: Description and Inference |
|
|
21 | (22) |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
|
23 | (2) |
|
Relative Standard Distance |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
Inferential Statistical Tests of Central Tendency and Dispersion |
|
|
25 | (2) |
|
|
27 | (2) |
|
|
29 | (2) |
|
Characteristics of Spatial Processes: First-Order and Second-Order Variation |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
Kernel Density Estimation |
|
|
32 | (3) |
|
|
35 | (2) |
|
Differences and Ratios of Kernel Density Estimators |
|
|
37 | (3) |
|
Differences in K-Functions |
|
|
40 | (3) |
|
|
43 | (42) |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
Nearest Neighbor Statistic |
|
|
44 | (2) |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
|
46 | (10) |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
Example 1: Leukemia in Central New York State |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
Example 2: Sudden Infant Death Syndrome in North Carolina |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
Example 3: Lung Cancer in Cambridgeshire |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
Minimum Expected Frequencies |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
Issues Associated with Scale |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
Testing with Multiple Quadrat Sizes |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
Optimal Quadrat Size: Appropriate Spatial Scales for Cluster Detection |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
A Comparison of Alternative Quadrat-Based Global Statistics |
|
|
54 | (2) |
|
Spatial Dependence: Moran's I |
|
|
56 | (3) |
|
|
57 | (2) |
|
Example: Low Birthweight Cases in California |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
|
59 | (2) |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
Example: Low Birthweight Cases in California |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
A Comparison of Moran's I and Geary's C |
|
|
61 | (6) |
|
Example: Spatial Variation in Handedness in the United States |
|
|
62 | (2) |
|
Statistical Power of I and C |
|
|
64 | (3) |
|
|
67 | (2) |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
Tango's Statistic and a Spatial Chi-Square Statistic |
|
|
69 | (4) |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
Example: Sudden Infant Death Syndrome in North Carolina |
|
|
71 | (2) |
|
Getis and Ord's Global Statistic |
|
|
73 | (2) |
|
Example: Low Birthweight Cases in California |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
Case-Control Data: The Cuzick-Edwards Test |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
A Global Quadrat Test of Clustering for Case-Control Data |
|
|
76 | (4) |
|
|
78 | (2) |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
A Modified Cuzick-Edwards Test |
|
|
80 | (5) |
|
Example: Leukemia and Lymphoma Case-Control Data in England |
|
|
82 | (3) |
|
|
85 | (22) |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
|
86 | (3) |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
Example: Low Birthweight Cases in California |
|
|
87 | (2) |
|
|
89 | (2) |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
|
91 | (2) |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
|
93 | (2) |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
Example: Low Birthweight Cases in California |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
Modeling around Point Sources with Case-Control Data |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
Cumulative and Maximum Chi-Square Tests as Focused Tests |
|
|
97 | (5) |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
Example: Leukemia and Lymphoma Case-Control Data in England |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
Discreteness of the Maximum Chi-Square Statistic |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
Relative Power of the Two Tests |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
The Local Quadrat Test and an Introduction to Multiple Testing via the M-Test |
|
|
102 | (5) |
|
Fuchs and Kenett's M Test |
|
|
103 | (2) |
|
Example 1: Sudden Infant Death Syndrome in North Carolina |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
Example 2: Lung Cancer in Cambridgeshire |
|
|
105 | (2) |
|
Tests for the Detection of Clustering, Including Scan Statistics |
|
|
107 | (28) |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
Openshaw et al.'s Geographical Analysis Machine (Gam) |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
Besag and Newell's Test for the Detection of Clusters |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
Fotheringham and Zhan's Method |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
Cluster Evaluation Permutation Procedure |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
Exploratory Spatial Analysis Approach of Rushton and Lolonis |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
Kulldorff's Spatial Scan Statistic with Variable Window Size |
|
|
113 | (6) |
|
Example 1: Low Birthweight Cases in California (Areal Data) |
|
|
113 | (4) |
|
Example 2: LBW Cases in California (Point Data) |
|
|
117 | (2) |
|
Bonferroni and Sidak Adjustments |
|
|
119 | (3) |
|
Power Loss with the Bonferroni Adjustment |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
Improvements on the Bonferroni Adjustment |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
Rogerson's Statistical Method for the Detection of Geographic Clustering |
|
|
123 | (12) |
|
The Geometry of Random Fields |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
Approximation for Discreteness of Observations |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
Approximations for the Exceedance Probability |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
An Approach Based on the Effective Number of Independent Resels |
|
|
128 | (2) |
|
|
130 | (3) |
|
|
133 | (2) |
|
Retrospective Detection of Changing Spatial Patterns |
|
|
135 | (22) |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
The Knox Statistic for Space-Time Interaction |
|
|
135 | (2) |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
Test for a Change in Mean for a Series of Normally Distributed Observations |
|
|
137 | (3) |
|
|
138 | (2) |
|
Retrospective Detection of Change in Multinomial Probabilities |
|
|
140 | (17) |
|
|
141 | (2) |
|
Example 1: Breast Cancer Mortality in the Northeastern United States |
|
|
143 | (2) |
|
Example 2: Recent Changes in the Spatial Pattern of Prostate Cancer Mortality in the United States |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
Geographic Variation in Incidence and Mortality Rates |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
Descriptive Measures of Change |
|
|
147 | (1) |
|
Retrospective Detection of Change |
|
|
148 | (5) |
|
|
153 | (3) |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
Introduction to Statistical Process Control and Nonspatial Cumulative Sum Methods of Surveillance |
|
|
157 | (28) |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
|
158 | (2) |
|
|
159 | (1) |
|
Cumulative Sum (Cusum) Methods |
|
|
160 | (5) |
|
|
163 | (2) |
|
|
165 | (2) |
|
Transformations to Normality |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
Cumulative Sums for Poisson Variables |
|
|
167 | (4) |
|
Cusum Charts for Poisson Data |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
Example: Kidney Failure in Cats |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
Poisson Cusums with Time-Varying Expectations |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
Example: Lower Respiratory Infection Episodes |
|
|
170 | (1) |
|
Cusum Methods for Exponential Data |
|
|
171 | (3) |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
Other Useful Modifications for Cusum Charts |
|
|
174 | (2) |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
Unknown Process Parameters |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
More on the Choice of Cusum Parameters |
|
|
176 | (7) |
|
Approximations for the Critical Threshold h for Given Choices of k and the In-Control ARL0 |
|
|
177 | (2) |
|
Approximations for the Critical Threshold h for Given Choices of k and the Out-of-Control ARL1 |
|
|
179 | (2) |
|
The Choice of k and h for Desired Values of ARL0 and ARL1.181 |
|
|
181 | (2) |
|
Other Methods for Temporal Surveillance |
|
|
183 | (2) |
|
Spatial Surveillance and the Monitoring of Global Statistics |
|
|
185 | (46) |
|
Brief Overview of the Development of Methods for Spatial Surveillance |
|
|
185 | (3) |
|
Introduction to Monitoring Global Spatial Statistics |
|
|
188 | (2) |
|
Cumulative Sum Methods and Global Spatial Statistics That Are Observed Periodically |
|
|
190 | (8) |
|
|
190 | (1) |
|
Example: Breast Cancer Mortality in the Northeastern United States |
|
|
191 | (5) |
|
Monitoring Chi-Square Statistics |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
CUSUM Methods and Global Spatial Statistics That Are Updated Periodically |
|
|
198 | (30) |
|
Spatial Surveillance Using Tango's Test for General Clustering |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
|
200 | (3) |
|
Example: Burkitt's Lymphoma in Uganda |
|
|
203 | (3) |
|
|
206 | (1) |
|
A Cusum Method Based upon the Knox Statistic: Monitoring Point Patterns for the Development of Space-Time Clusters |
|
|
207 | (1) |
|
|
207 | (3) |
|
A Method for Monitoring Changes in Space-Time Interaction |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
Example: Burkitt's Lymphoma in Uganda |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
|
212 | (2) |
|
Cusum Method Combined with Nearest-Neighbor Statistic |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
Monitoring Changes in Point Patterns |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
A Cusum Approach for the Nearest-Neighbor Statistic |
|
|
215 | (2) |
|
Simulations of Clustering in the Unit Square |
|
|
217 | (1) |
|
Example: Application to Crime Analysis and Data from the Buffalo Police Department |
|
|
218 | (1) |
|
Cusum Approach for Arson Data |
|
|
218 | (4) |
|
Surveillance Using a Moving Window of Observations |
|
|
222 | (6) |
|
|
228 | (3) |
|
Cusum Charts for Local Statistics and for the Simultaneous Monitoring of Many Regions |
|
|
231 | (28) |
|
Monitoring around a Predefined Location |
|
|
231 | (12) |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
Raubertas' Approach to Monitoring Local Statistics |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
Monitoring a Single Local Statistic: Autocorrelated Regional Variables |
|
|
232 | (1) |
|
An Approach Based on Score Statistics |
|
|
233 | (1) |
|
Spatial Surveillance around Foci: A Generalized Score Statistic, Tango's CF |
|
|
233 | (2) |
|
|
235 | (1) |
|
Application to Data on Burkitt's Lymphoma |
|
|
236 | (2) |
|
Surveillance around Prespecified Locations Using Case-Control Data |
|
|
238 | (1) |
|
|
238 | (1) |
|
Prospective Monitoring around a Source, Using Case-Control Data |
|
|
238 | (1) |
|
|
239 | (4) |
|
Spatial Surveillance: Separate Charts for Each Region |
|
|
243 | (9) |
|
|
245 | (4) |
|
Example: Kidney Failure in Cats |
|
|
249 | (1) |
|
Example: Breast Cancer Mortality in the Northeastern United States |
|
|
250 | (2) |
|
Monitoring Many Local Statistics Simultaneously |
|
|
252 | (5) |
|
Example: Breast Cancer Mortality in the Northeastern United States |
|
|
255 | (1) |
|
|
256 | (1) |
|
|
257 | (2) |
|
|
257 | (2) |
|
More Approaches to the Statistical Surveillance of Geographic Clustering |
|
|
259 | (30) |
|
|
259 | (1) |
|
Monitoring Spatial Maxima |
|
|
260 | (9) |
|
Monitoring Spatial Maxima |
|
|
261 | (1) |
|
Type I Extreme Value (Gumbel) Distribution |
|
|
262 | (1) |
|
Cusum Surveillance of Gumbel Variates |
|
|
263 | (1) |
|
Example: Female Breast Cancer Mortality Rates in the Northeastern United States |
|
|
264 | (2) |
|
Example: Prostate Cancer Data in the United States |
|
|
266 | (2) |
|
Determination of Threshold Parameter |
|
|
268 | (1) |
|
|
268 | (1) |
|
Multivariate Cusum Approaches |
|
|
269 | (20) |
|
|
269 | (1) |
|
Alternative Approaches to Monitoring Regional Change for More Than One Region |
|
|
270 | (1) |
|
Methods and Illustrations |
|
|
271 | (1) |
|
|
271 | (1) |
|
Hypothetical, Simulated Scenarios |
|
|
272 | (4) |
|
|
276 | (2) |
|
Example: Breast Cancer Mortality in the Northeastern United States |
|
|
278 | (2) |
|
Multiple Univariate Results |
|
|
280 | (3) |
|
|
283 | (1) |
|
Interpretation of Multivariate Results |
|
|
283 | (2) |
|
Estimation of Covariance and a Nonparametric Approach |
|
|
285 | (2) |
|
|
287 | (2) |
|
Summary: Associated Tests for Cluster Detection and Surveillance |
|
|
289 | (14) |
|
|
289 | (1) |
|
Associated Retrospective Statistical Tests |
|
|
290 | (10) |
|
Associated Retrospective Statistical Tests: Aspatial Case |
|
|
291 | (1) |
|
Associated Retrospective Statistical Tests: Spatial Case |
|
|
292 | (4) |
|
|
296 | (1) |
|
|
297 | (1) |
|
Example: Application to Leukemia Data for Central New York State |
|
|
297 | (3) |
|
Associated Prospective Statistical Tests: Regional Surveillance for Quick Detection of Change |
|
|
300 | (3) |
|
Prospective Methods: Aspatial Case |
|
|
300 | (1) |
|
Prospective Methods: Spatial Case |
|
|
301 | (2) |
References |
|
303 | (10) |
Author Index |
|
313 | (4) |
Subject Index |
|
317 | |