List of Contributors |
|
xxii | |
Preface |
|
xxvii | |
Part I Overview, Concepts, and Approaches |
|
1 | (142) |
|
1 The Evolving Role of Structural Biology in Drug Discovery |
|
|
3 | (20) |
|
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
1.2 The Expanding Toolbox of Structural Biology for Drug Discovery |
|
|
5 | (5) |
|
1.3 The Various Uses of Structural Biology in Drug Discovery |
|
|
10 | (2) |
|
1.4 Evolving Drugs and Targets |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
1.5 Current Trends and Perspectives |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
14 | (9) |
|
2 A Structural View on Druggability: Experimental and Computational Approaches |
|
|
23 | (30) |
|
|
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
2.2 Views on Target Druggability |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
2.3 In Silico Methods for Druggability Assessment of Targets with Well-defined Pockets |
|
|
25 | (9) |
|
2.3.1 Binding Site Identification |
|
|
26 | (2) |
|
2.3.2 Selection of Descriptors and Datasets for Method Development |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
2.3.3 Development of Druggability Models |
|
|
29 | (4) |
|
2.3.4 Druggability Prediction via Alternative Methods |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
2.4 Experimental Methods for Druggability Assessment |
|
|
34 | (3) |
|
2.5 A Challenge for Druggability Predictions: Protein-Protein Interactions |
|
|
37 | (8) |
|
2.5.1 Identification of Binding Sites for Protein-Protein Interaction Targets |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
2.5.1.1 Computational Solvent Mapping |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
2.5.1.2 Molecular Dynamics and Monte Carlo Simulations |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
2.5.1.3 Hot Spot Identification |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
2.5.2 Druggability Assessment of Protein-Protein Interaction Targets |
|
|
43 | (2) |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
|
46 | (7) |
|
3 Structural Chemogenomics: Profiling Protein-Ligand Interactions in Polypharmacological Space |
|
|
53 | (26) |
|
|
|
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
3.2 Simultaneously Targeting Multiple Proteins Can Be More Efficient in Disrupting Disease Mechanism |
|
|
54 | (3) |
|
3.2.1 Disease Mechanisms Call for the Need of A Systematic Targeting Approach |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
3.2.2 Multiple Ways to Adopt A Multi-target Approach with Low-Affinity Binders |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
3.2.3 Polypharmacology Allows for Repurposing of Marketed Drugs and Drug Rescue |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
3.2.4 Optimization of Multiple Structure-Activity Relationships Simultaneously Is Difficult |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
3.3 Computer-Aided Approaches for Profiling Bioactivities of Ligands |
|
|
57 | (11) |
|
3.3.1 Ligand-Based Methods for Target Prediction |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
3.3.1.1 In Silico Target Prediction Using Chemical Similarity Methods and Data Mining |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
3.3.1.2 Ligand-Based Pharmacophore-Based Models for Target Prediction |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
3.3.1.3 Identification of Privileged Ligand Scaffolds and Structure-Selectivity Cliffs |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
3.3.2 Protein-Ligand-Based Methods to Predict Bioactivities of Ligands Against Targets |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
3.3.2.1 Chemogenomics for All-Against-All Bioactivity Prediction |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
3.3.2.2 Proteochemometric Modeling Combines Protein-Ligand Space in a Predictive Statistical Method |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
3.3.3 Structure-Based Tools for Prospective Protein-Ligand Interaction Prediction |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
3.3.3.1 Cavity Detection Methods Locate Probable Ligand Binding Sites |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
3.3.3.2 Cavity Description Methods Simplify Protein Structure Description for Fast Binding Site Comparison |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
3.3.3.3 Similarity Search Methods |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
3.3.3.4 Scoring Protein Cavity Similarity by Counting Overlapping Occurrences |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
3.3.3.5 Protein-Based Pharmacophore Modeling |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
3.3.3.6 Target Fishing Using Proteome-Scale Docking |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
3.3.3.7 Post-processing Docking Data to Complement Scoring Functions |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
3.3.3.8 Knowledge-Based Structural Databases to Navigate Protein-Ligand Interaction Space |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
|
68 | (3) |
|
3.4.1 Designing Ligands with Desired D2 and D4 Dopamine Receptor Activities |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
3.4.2 Similarity Ensemble Approach (SEA) to Predict Off-Target Binding of FDA-Approved Drugs |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
3.4.3 Target Prediction in Chemical Genetics Using SEA |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
3.4.4 Ligand-Based Prediction of Target Space for Malaria Drug Development Using PredictFX |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
3.4.5 Chemically Similar Compounds of Multi-target SAR-Tested Ligands Inhibit Cell Proliferation and Tumor Growth |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
3.4.6 Prospective Prediction of Cross-Reaction Protein Kinase Inhibitors Using Binding Site Comparison Method SiteAlign |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
3.4.7 Explaining the Mode of Action of Traditional Medicine Using A Chemogenomic Target Prediction Tool |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
3.4.8 Combining Ligand-Based and Structure-Based Pharmacophore Screenings to Determine Novel Bioactive GPCR Ligands and Multi-target Binding |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
3.4.9 Profiling Bioactive Compounds Using a Combined Ligand-Based and Protein-Based Workflow |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
|
72 | (7) |
|
4 Fragment-Based Ligand Discovery |
|
|
79 | (20) |
|
|
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
4.2 The Evolution of FBLD |
|
|
79 | (2) |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
4.4.1 Step A: Chemoinformatics Selection |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
4.4.2 Step B: Focused Libraries? |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
4.4.3 Step C: Characterizing Diversity |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
4.4.4 Step D: Visual Inspection |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
4.5 Maintaining a Fragment Library |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
|
84 | (5) |
|
4.6.1 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) |
|
|
84 | (3) |
|
4.6.2 Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
4.6.3 Thermal Shift Assay (TSA) |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
4.6.7 Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC) |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
4.6.8 Other Ideas and Approaches |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
4.7 Integrating Fragments with Other Compounds |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
4.8 Validating Fragment Hits: Comparing Methods |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
4.10 Determining Structures of Fragment: Protein Complexes |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
|
92 | (4) |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
|
96 | (3) |
|
5 Combining Structural, Thermodynamic, and Kinetic Information to Drive Hit-to-Lead Progression |
|
|
99 | (26) |
|
|
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
5.2 The Role of Thermodynamics in Hit to Lead |
|
|
99 | (8) |
|
5.2.1 Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC) Technology and Measurements |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
5.2.1.2 Commercial ITC Instrument History |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
5.2.1.3 ITC Instrumentation |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
5.2.1.4 The ITC Experiment |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
5.2.1.5 Measurement of Thermodynamic Parameters |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
5.2.1.6 Benefits of Applying Thermodynamic Measurements in Hit to Lead |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
5.2.1.7 Exploitation of Measured Thermodynamics |
|
|
104 | (3) |
|
5.3 The Role of Kinetics in Hit to Lead |
|
|
107 | (14) |
|
5.3.1 Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) Technology and Measurements |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
5.3.1.2 Commercial SPR Instrument History |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
5.3.1.3 General SPR Instrumentation |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
5.3.1.4 The SPR Experiment |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
5.3.1.5 Other Methods to Determine Binding Kinetics |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
5.3.1.6 Biolayer Interferometry (BLI) |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
5.3.1.7 Radioligand Binding |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
5.3.1.9 Mechanism of Action |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
5.3.1.10 Protein Structure and Dynamics |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
5.3.1.11 Correlating Kinetic and Structural Data in Hit-to-Lead Programs |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
5.3.1.12 Correlating Structural and Thermodynamic Data in Hit-to-Lead Programs |
|
|
118 | (3) |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
|
122 | (3) |
|
6 Allostery as Structure-Encoded Collective Dynamics: Significance in Drug Design |
|
|
125 | (18) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125 | (3) |
|
6.1.1 Experimental Data Highlight the Complexity of Allosteric Events, Beyond MWC or KNF Models: Bacterial Chaperonin GroEL as a Paradigm |
|
|
125 | (2) |
|
6.1.2 New Views: Allostery as Population Shift Between Preexisting Conformers or Reconfiguration Along Preexisting Soft Path |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
6.1.3 Dynamics and Drug Discovery |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
6.2 Computational Methods |
|
|
128 | (4) |
|
6.2.1 Gaussian Network Model (GNM): Simplest ENM |
|
|
129 | (2) |
|
6.2.2 Anisotropic Network Model (ANM) Theory and Assumptions |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
|
132 | (4) |
|
6.3.1 Conformational Sampling by ANM and Comparison with Experimental Data and Molecular Simulations |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
6.3.1.1 p38 Protein Kinase |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
6.3.1.2 Leucine Transporter (LeuT) |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
6.3.2 Allosteric Drug Binding Sites Inferred from ENM Analysis: Application to HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase |
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
6.3.3 Pharmacophore Modeling from Druggability Simulations |
|
|
134 | (2) |
|
6.4 Future Directions and Conclusion |
|
|
136 | (2) |
|
6.4.1 Allosteric Cooperativity and Cellular Effects |
|
|
136 | (2) |
|
6.4.2 Future Directions and Concluding Remarks |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
|
138 | (5) |
Part II Tools |
|
143 | (220) |
|
7 Biophysical Assessment of Target Protein Quality in Structure-Based Drug Discovery |
|
|
145 | (20) |
|
|
|
7.1 Biophysical Methods in Drug Discovery |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
7.2 Case Study I: Micro-inhomogeneity |
|
|
146 | (4) |
|
7.2.1 Recovering Active Enzyme for Ligand Co-crystallization: The Lysosomal Cysteine Protease Cathepsin S |
|
|
146 | (4) |
|
7.3 The Role of Biophysical Methods in the Optimization of Protein Crystallization |
|
|
150 | (4) |
|
7.3.1 Biophysical Methods Performed in Solution (Liquid Sample) |
|
|
151 | (3) |
|
7.3.2 Biophysical. Methods That Require Immobilization on Surfaces or Transfer of the Protein to the Gas Phase |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
7.4 Case Study II: Minimizing Macro-inhomogeneity |
|
|
154 | (5) |
|
7.4.1 Optimizing Detergent Conditions for Membrane Proteins: The Mitochondrial β-Oxidation Pacemaker Carnitine Palmitoyltransferase 2 |
|
|
154 | (4) |
|
7.4.2 Comparison of AUC to SEC for the Characterization of CPT-2 |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
7.5 Outlook and Concluding Remarks: Requirements for Upcoming Biophysical Methods |
|
|
159 | (1) |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
|
160 | (5) |
|
8 An Industrial Perspective on Protein-Ligand Complex Crystallization |
|
|
165 | (22) |
|
|
|
8.1 Introduction to Co-crystal Structures and Drug Development |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
8.2 Basics of X-Ray Analysis of Co-crystals |
|
|
165 | (2) |
|
8.2.1 Protein Crystallography in a Nutshell |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
8.2.2 Application of X-Ray Analysis to the Study of Ligand Binding |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
|
167 | (2) |
|
8.3.1 Detection of Ligand Binding |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
8.3.2 Validation of Ligand Binding |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
8.3.3 Ligand Binding Sites: Pockets, Grooves, and Allosteric Sites |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
8.3.4 Crystal Packing Sites and Other Artifacts |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
8.3.5 Complementary Techniques: NMR, SPR, ITC, DSF, SAXS, and EM |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
8.4 Preparing Protein for Successful Crystallization |
|
|
169 | (3) |
|
8.4.1 Construct Design and the Importance of Boundary Predictions |
|
|
170 | (1) |
|
|
170 | (1) |
|
8.4.3 Protein Purification and Quality Assessment |
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
|
172 | (3) |
|
8.5.1 The Crystallization Process |
|
|
172 | (1) |
|
8.5.2 Crystallization Screening |
|
|
172 | (1) |
|
8.5.3 Automation of Crystallization Setup and Imaging |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
8.5.4 Optimization of Crystallization |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
8.5.5 What If the Protein Does Not Crystallize? |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
8.6 Selecting Ligands for Crystallization |
|
|
175 | (3) |
|
8.6.1 Introduction to Ligands and Compound Selection |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
8.6.2 Finding the Best Starting Point for Hit to Lead |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
8.6.3 Hot Spots, Potency, and IC50's |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
8.6.4 The Importance of Solubility |
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
8.6.5 The Effects of Ligands on Protein Stabilization |
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
8.6.6 Pitfalls of Detecting Ligand Binding in a Protein Crystal |
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
8.7 Methods for Obtaining Co-Crystals: Soaking and Co-crystallization |
|
|
178 | (6) |
|
8.7.1 Concept of Ligand Soaking |
|
|
178 | (1) |
|
8.7.2 Advantages and Potential of Soaking Ligands |
|
|
178 | (1) |
|
8.7.3 Ligand Concentrations |
|
|
179 | (1) |
|
8.7.4 Exemplary Soaking Can Guide Drug Discovery |
|
|
180 | (2) |
|
8.7.5 Concept of Co-crystallization |
|
|
182 | (1) |
|
8.7.6 Advantages and Potential of Co-Crystallization |
|
|
182 | (1) |
|
8.7.7 Case Study: Complex Structures of HdmX with p53 Peptide Analogs |
|
|
182 | (2) |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
|
184 | (3) |
|
9 Membrane Protein Crystallization |
|
|
187 | (24) |
|
|
|
|
187 | (2) |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
9.1.2 Membrane Protein Biochemistry |
|
|
187 | (2) |
|
9.1.3 Overview from Protein Preparation to Crystallization |
|
|
189 | (1) |
|
9.2 Membrane Protein Production |
|
|
189 | (3) |
|
9.2.1 Membrane Proteins from Natural Sources |
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
9.2.2 Bacterial and Yeast Expression Systems |
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
9.2.3 Insect Cell Expression Systems |
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
9.2.4 Mammalian Cell Expression Systems |
|
|
192 | (1) |
|
9.2.5 Cell-Free Expression Systems |
|
|
192 | (1) |
|
9.3 Amphipathic Manipulation of Membrane Proteins |
|
|
192 | (3) |
|
9.3.1 Detergent in Membrane Protein Biochemistry |
|
|
192 | (2) |
|
9.3.2 Classical Detergents |
|
|
194 | (1) |
|
9.3.3 Maltose-neopentyl Glycol Amphiphiles |
|
|
194 | (1) |
|
|
194 | (1) |
|
9.3.5 Lipopeptide Detergents and n-Strand Peptides |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
9.4 Preparing Protein Samples for Crystallization |
|
|
195 | (3) |
|
9.4.1 Overview of Protein Sample Preparation |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
9.4.2 Criteria for Selecting Suitable Protein Targets |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
9.4.3 Quality Control of Purified MPs |
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
9.4.4 Protein Engineering |
|
|
198 | (1) |
|
9.5 Membrane Protein Crystallization |
|
|
198 | (5) |
|
9.5.1 In Surfo Crystallization |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
9.5.2 In Meso Crystallization |
|
|
200 | (1) |
|
9.5.3 Bicelle Crystallization |
|
|
200 | (1) |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
9.5.5 Effect of Detergent and Lipid in Crystallization |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
9.5.6 Complex with Fusion and Binding Partners |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
9.5.7 Optimizing Crystallization Conditions |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
9.5.8 Evaluating Crystallization Conditions |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
9.6 Methods for Determining Membrane Protein Structures |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
9.6.1 X-Ray Crystallography |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
9.6.2 X-Ray Free-Electron Laser |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
9.6.3 Cryo-electron Microscopy |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
9.6.4 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
9.7 Conclusion and Outlooks |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
|
205 | (6) |
|
10 High-Throughput Macromolecular Crystallography in Drug Discovery: Evolving in the Midst of Revolutions |
|
|
211 | (42) |
|
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
10.2 Setting the Scene for Evolution and Revolutions |
|
|
212 | (2) |
|
10.2.1 MX, SBDD, and SG and Beyond |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
10.2.2 MX for SBDD in a Nutshell: A Vast Combinatorial Search |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
10.2.3 The High-Throughput (HT) Imperative in MX-for-SBDD Workflows |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
10.3 Baseline: The "Human, All Too Human" Workflow of Early MX for SBDD |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
10.4 First Wave of Automation Toward High-Throughput Operation: Robotics Without Refactoring |
|
|
215 | (2) |
|
10.5 Second Wave of Automation: The Twin Tracks of In Situ Crystallography and Microcrystallography |
|
|
217 | (15) |
|
10.5.1 In Situ Crystallography |
|
|
218 | (1) |
|
|
218 | (1) |
|
10.5.1.2 Immediate Screening for Diffraction Quality |
|
|
218 | (1) |
|
10.5.1.3 Data Collection from Multiple Small Crystals |
|
|
218 | (1) |
|
10.5.1.4 Robotics Unbound: Take 1 |
|
|
219 | (1) |
|
10.5.1.5 Related Instrumental Developments |
|
|
220 | (1) |
|
10.5.2 Microcrystallography |
|
|
221 | (1) |
|
|
221 | (1) |
|
10.5.2.2 Hard Limits on MX Diffraction Measurements from Fundamental Principles |
|
|
221 | (1) |
|
10.5.2.3 Aiming for the Highest Possible S/N Ratio in MX Experiments |
|
|
222 | (1) |
|
10.5.2.4 Related Instrumental Developments |
|
|
228 | (1) |
|
10.5.3 Convergence Toward Multi-crystal Data Collection |
|
|
228 | (1) |
|
10.5.3.1 Microcrystallography in Action: A Chronicle of Early GPCR Structure Determinations |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
10.5.3.2 In Situ Crystallography in Action: Two Recent Studies on Membrane Proteins |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
10.5.3.3 Evolution of Processing Methods for Multi-crystal Datasets |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
10.6 An Emerging Third Wave of Automation: Serial Microcrystallography |
|
|
232 | (3) |
|
10.6.1 XFELs and SFX: A Very Brief Introduction |
|
|
232 | (1) |
|
10.6.1.1 Sample Delivery Issues |
|
|
232 | (1) |
|
10.6.1.2 Data Analysis Issues |
|
|
233 | (1) |
|
10.6.2 Serial Crystallography as the Convergence of SMX and SFX |
|
|
233 | (1) |
|
10.6.3 Pros and Cons of SMX vs. SFX |
|
|
233 | (1) |
|
10.6.4 The Heart of the Matter for Serial Crystallography: The Humpty Dumpty Problem |
|
|
234 | (1) |
|
10.6.5 A Neglected Niche: Club Class Data Collection on Macrocrystals |
|
|
235 | (1) |
|
10.7 From Diffraction Data to Structural Results: Evolving Best Practices |
|
|
235 | (4) |
|
10.7.1 Setting Up the Framework for Ligand Screening and Binding Mode Characterization by HTMX |
|
|
235 | (1) |
|
|
235 | (1) |
|
10.7.1.2 High-Quality Reference Model |
|
|
235 | (1) |
|
10.7.1.3 Bookkeeping of Variants of Crystal Forms and Reference Models |
|
|
236 | (1) |
|
10.7.1.4 Ligand Chemoinformatics and Molecular Geometry |
|
|
236 | (1) |
|
10.7.2 Operating the High-Throughput Ligand Screening Pipeline |
|
|
236 | (1) |
|
10.7.2.1 Processing Diffraction Images and Identification of Crystal Form |
|
|
236 | (1) |
|
10.7.2.2 Use of Reference Atomic Models and mtz Files |
|
|
236 | (1) |
|
10.7.2.3 Eliciting Difference Density for Ligand Detection |
|
|
236 | (1) |
|
10.7.2.4 Ligand Electron Density Analysis and Automated Fitting |
|
|
237 | (1) |
|
10.7.2.5 Final Refinement of Ligand-Target Complex |
|
|
237 | (1) |
|
10.7.2.6 Validation of the Ligand-Target Co-structure |
|
|
238 | (1) |
|
10.7.3 Post-analysis of Ensembles of Ligand Co-structures |
|
|
238 | (1) |
|
10.7.4 Auto-processing at Synchrotrons: Toward Specialized Cloud Computing? |
|
|
238 | (1) |
|
10.8 Conclusions and Outlook: Whither HTMX for Drug Discovery? |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
|
240 | (1) |
|
|
240 | (13) |
|
11 Assessment of Crystallographic Structure Quality and Protein-Ligand Complex Structure Validation |
|
|
253 | (24) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
253 | (3) |
|
|
256 | (1) |
|
|
256 | (7) |
|
11.3.1 Dataset Quality: Resolution |
|
|
256 | (1) |
|
11.3.2 Dataset Quality: Other Quality Indicators of Diffraction Data |
|
|
257 | (1) |
|
11.3.3 Agreement of the Model to the Experimental Data |
|
|
258 | (1) |
|
11.3.3.1 Agreement of the Model to the Experimental Data: R and Rfree Factors |
|
|
258 | (1) |
|
11.3.3.2 Agreement of the Model with the Experimental Data: B-Factors and Occupancy |
|
|
258 | (1) |
|
11.3.3.3 Agreement of the Model to the Experimental Data: Electron Density Fit |
|
|
259 | (2) |
|
11.3.4 Stereochemical Accuracy of the Model |
|
|
261 | (1) |
|
11.3.4.1 Stereochemical Accuracy of the Model: Bond Length and Angle r.m.s.d. |
|
|
261 | (1) |
|
11.3.4.2 Stereochemical Accuracy of the Model: Ramachandran Plot and Peptide Planarity |
|
|
261 | (1) |
|
11.3.4.3 Stereochemical Accuracy of the Model: van der Waals Clashes and Hydrogen Bonding Networks |
|
|
262 | (1) |
|
11.3.4.4 Stereochemical Accuracy of the Model: Metal Ions |
|
|
263 | (1) |
|
11.3.5 Coordinate Uncertainty |
|
|
263 | (1) |
|
11.4 Low-Resolution Structures |
|
|
263 | (1) |
|
11.5 Possible Influence of Crystal Packing |
|
|
264 | (1) |
|
|
265 | (3) |
|
11.7 Analysis of Quality Metrics |
|
|
268 | (3) |
|
|
271 | (1) |
|
|
271 | (1) |
|
|
271 | (6) |
|
12 Complementary Information from Neutron Crystallography Studies |
|
|
277 | (18) |
|
|
|
|
277 | (1) |
|
12.2 Differences in Characteristics of X-Rays and Neutrons |
|
|
277 | (1) |
|
12.3 A Brief History of Protein Neutron Crystallography |
|
|
278 | (1) |
|
12.4 Facility, Neutron Source, and Detector |
|
|
278 | (1) |
|
12.5 Current Status of Neutron Protein Crystallography |
|
|
278 | (1) |
|
12.6 Method for Neutron Crystallography of Proteins |
|
|
279 | (4) |
|
12.6.1 Sample Preparation |
|
|
279 | (1) |
|
12.6.1.1 Sample Requirement for Neuron Crystallography |
|
|
279 | (1) |
|
12.6.1.2 Protein Overproduction and Purification for Neutron Protein Crystallography |
|
|
280 | (1) |
|
12.6.1.3 Perdeuteration of Protein |
|
|
280 | (1) |
|
12.6.1.4 Consideration of Chemical Instability During the Crystallization Experiment |
|
|
280 | (1) |
|
12.6.1.5 Crystal Lattice Engineering to Control Crystal Packing |
|
|
281 | (1) |
|
12.6.2 Crystal Growth for Neutron Protein Crystallography |
|
|
281 | (1) |
|
12.6.2.1 Crystallization Screening to Obtain a Large Crystal Volume |
|
|
281 | (1) |
|
12.6.2.2 Macroseeding to Grow Large Crystals |
|
|
281 | (1) |
|
12.6.2.3 Periodic Addition of Protein to Promote Large Crystal Growth |
|
|
281 | (1) |
|
12.6.3 Neutron Diffraction Experiment |
|
|
281 | (1) |
|
12.6.3.1 Mounting a Deuterated Protein Crystal |
|
|
281 | (1) |
|
12.6.3.2 Neutron Diffraction Data Collection |
|
|
281 | (1) |
|
12.6.3.3 Data Processing of the Neutron Diffraction Dataset |
|
|
282 | (1) |
|
12.6.3.4 Model Building Along with the Neutron Scattering Length Map |
|
|
283 | (1) |
|
12.7 General Information Obtained from Neutron Crystallography |
|
|
283 | (2) |
|
12.7.1 Hydrogen Atoms Contributing to the Fold of a Protein |
|
|
283 | (1) |
|
12.7.1.1 Hydrogen Bonding Interaction |
|
|
283 | (1) |
|
12.7.1.2 Structure of Aliphatic Groups |
|
|
284 | (1) |
|
12.7.2 Hydration Structure |
|
|
284 | (1) |
|
12.7.3 Ionization Status of Side Chains |
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
12.7.3.1 Ionization Status of Active Site Residues |
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
12.7.3.2 Hydrogen Atoms of Residues at Protein-Protein Interfaces |
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
12.8 Use of Neutron Crystallography for the Structure Analysis of Protein Drug Targets |
|
|
285 | (2) |
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
12.8.1.1 Acid Proteases as a Drug Target |
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
12.8.1.2 Neutron Structure Analysis of HIV-1 Protease |
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
|
286 | (1) |
|
12.8.2.1 Serine Proteases as a Drug Target Protein |
|
|
286 | (1) |
|
12.8.2.2 Neutron Structure Analysis of Porcine Pancreatic Elastase with Its Inhibitor |
|
|
287 | (1) |
|
12.9 Use of Neutron Protein Crystallography for Drug Design |
|
|
287 | (2) |
|
12.9.1 Determination of the Ionization State of Active Site Residues |
|
|
287 | (1) |
|
12.9.2 Characteristics of the Hydration of Water |
|
|
288 | (1) |
|
12.9.3 Discrimination of Atoms, Water Molecules, and Other Bound Inorganic Ions |
|
|
288 | (1) |
|
12.9.4 Improvement of Protein-Protein Association |
|
|
288 | (1) |
|
12.10 Future Perspectives of the Use of Neutron Crystallography for Drug Design |
|
|
289 | (1) |
|
|
289 | (6) |
|
13 Determination of Protein Structure and Dynamics by NMR: State of the Art and Application to the Characterization of Biotherapeutics |
|
|
295 | (30) |
|
|
|
|
|
295 | (1) |
|
13.2 Solution Structure Determination of Macromolecules by NMR |
|
|
296 | (5) |
|
|
296 | (1) |
|
13.2.2 The NMR Observables |
|
|
297 | (2) |
|
13.2.3 From NMR Observables to 3D Models |
|
|
299 | (1) |
|
13.2.4 Current Developments |
|
|
300 | (1) |
|
13.3 Assignment and Labeling Strategies |
|
|
301 | (3) |
|
13.3.1 Spectral Assignment |
|
|
301 | (1) |
|
13.3.1.1 Homonuclear Spectroscopy |
|
|
301 | (1) |
|
13.3.1.2 Labeling with 15N, 13C, and 2H |
|
|
301 | (1) |
|
13.3.2 Partial or Full Assignment |
|
|
301 | (1) |
|
13.3.2.1 Backbone Assignment |
|
|
301 | (1) |
|
13.3.2.2 Side-Chain Assignment |
|
|
302 | (1) |
|
13.3.2.3 Site-Directed Mutagenesis |
|
|
303 | (1) |
|
13.3.3 Isotopic Labeling Methods |
|
|
303 | (1) |
|
|
303 | (1) |
|
|
303 | (1) |
|
|
303 | (1) |
|
13.3.3.4 Insect or Mammalian Cells |
|
|
303 | (1) |
|
13.3.3.5 Chemical Synthesis |
|
|
303 | (1) |
|
|
303 | (1) |
|
13.3.4.1 Native Unlabeled Proteins |
|
|
303 | (1) |
|
13.3.4.2 Classical 15N, 15N-13C, and 15N-13C-2H Approaches |
|
|
303 | (1) |
|
|
304 | (1) |
|
|
304 | (1) |
|
13.3.4.5 Selective Amino Acid Labeling/Unlabeling |
|
|
304 | (1) |
|
13.3.4.6 Subunit Labeling/Segmental Labeling |
|
|
304 | (1) |
|
13.3.4.7 Chemical Labeling |
|
|
304 | (1) |
|
13.4 NMR and Dynamic Aspects |
|
|
304 | (3) |
|
13.5 Biomolecular Dynamics by NMR |
|
|
307 | (3) |
|
|
307 | (1) |
|
13.5.2 Probing Disorder: Relaxation Measurements and Interpretation |
|
|
308 | (1) |
|
13.5.3 Beyond the Rotational Diffusion Limit |
|
|
309 | (1) |
|
13.6 Intrinsically Disordered Proteins |
|
|
310 | (3) |
|
|
310 | (1) |
|
13.6.2 General Presentation of IDPs |
|
|
310 | (1) |
|
13.6.3 NMR Techniques for IDP |
|
|
311 | (1) |
|
13.6.4 Interpreting IDP Spectra |
|
|
312 | (1) |
|
13.6.5 IDPs as Drug Targets |
|
|
313 | (1) |
|
13.7 Alternative Approaches for Non-soluble Proteins |
|
|
313 | (2) |
|
|
313 | (1) |
|
|
314 | (1) |
|
13.8 Optimized Strategies for the Study of Biomolecules in Solution |
|
|
315 | (3) |
|
13.8.1 Instrumental Setup |
|
|
315 | (1) |
|
13.8.2 Sample Preparation |
|
|
315 | (1) |
|
13.8.2.1 Unlabeled Proteins in Buffer |
|
|
316 | (1) |
|
13.8.2.2 Labeled Proteins |
|
|
316 | (1) |
|
|
316 | (1) |
|
|
316 | (1) |
|
13.8.3.2 1D Spectroscopy on Unlabeled Samples |
|
|
317 | (1) |
|
13.8.3.3 2D Spectroscopy on Unlabeled Samples |
|
|
317 | (1) |
|
13.8.3.4 2D and 3D Spectroscopy on Labeled Samples |
|
|
318 | (1) |
|
|
318 | (1) |
|
|
319 | (6) |
|
14 NMR Studies of Protein-Small Molecule Interactions for Drug Discovery |
|
|
325 | (22) |
|
|
|
|
325 | (2) |
|
14.2 Early-Stage Discovery |
|
|
327 | (6) |
|
|
327 | (1) |
|
14.2.2 Hit Identification and Validation |
|
|
328 | (4) |
|
14.2.3 Hit-to-Lead Optimization |
|
|
332 | (1) |
|
|
333 | (2) |
|
14.4 Emerging Applications/Fields |
|
|
335 | (5) |
|
|
335 | (2) |
|
14.4.2 In-Cell NMR Spectroscopy |
|
|
337 | (1) |
|
14.4.3 Intrinsically Disordered Proteins |
|
|
337 | (3) |
|
|
340 | (1) |
|
|
340 | (7) |
|
15 Computational Structural Biology for Drug Discovery: Power and Limitations |
|
|
347 | (16) |
|
|
|
|
347 | (1) |
|
15.2 Converting PDB Entries into Full-Atom Models |
|
|
347 | (4) |
|
15.2.1 Extent of the Construct |
|
|
347 | (1) |
|
15.2.2 Electron Density Fit |
|
|
348 | (1) |
|
|
349 | (1) |
|
15.2.4 Pocket Environment and Functional State |
|
|
349 | (1) |
|
|
349 | (2) |
|
|
351 | (3) |
|
15.3.1 Homology Modeling Process |
|
|
351 | (1) |
|
|
352 | (1) |
|
|
352 | (1) |
|
|
353 | (1) |
|
|
353 | (1) |
|
15.3.5.1 Sequence-Structure Relationship and Template Selection |
|
|
353 | (1) |
|
15.3.5.2 Target-Template Alignment |
|
|
353 | (1) |
|
15.3.5.3 Backbone Deviations |
|
|
353 | (1) |
|
|
354 | (1) |
|
|
354 | (1) |
|
15.3.5.6 Model Selection and Ranking |
|
|
354 | (1) |
|
15.4 Prediction of Protein-Ligand Interactions |
|
|
354 | (3) |
|
15.4.1 Prediction of Transition State Analogs |
|
|
357 | (1) |
|
15.4.2 Compound Profiling |
|
|
357 | (1) |
|
15.4.3 Prediction of Compound Metabolism |
|
|
357 | (1) |
|
|
357 | (1) |
|
|
358 | (1) |
|
|
358 | (5) |
Part III Structure-Based Discovery in Some Important or Promising Targets and Therapeutic Families |
|
363 | (158) |
|
16 The Role of Structural Biology in Kinase Inhibitor Drug Discovery Success |
|
|
365 | (30) |
|
|
16.1 Protein Kinases and Their Structural Elements: A Dynamic Landscape for Drug Discovery |
|
|
365 | (5) |
|
16.2 The Challenge of Selectivity and Drug Resistance: Design and Discovery of Afatinib, the First Irreversible Protein Kinase Inhibitor Approved for Cancer Treatment |
|
|
370 | (5) |
|
16.3 When Structural Biology Drives Chemistry to Therapeutic Breakthrough: The Vemurafenib Case History |
|
|
375 | (2) |
|
16.4 Second-Generation Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibitors: The Discovery of the First-in-Class Drug Ceritinib |
|
|
377 | (3) |
|
16.5 The Discovery of Type II Inhibitor Ponatinib: A Milestone in the Struggle Against the ABL Gatekeeper Resistant Mutation T315I |
|
|
380 | (3) |
|
16.6 Protein Kinase Inhibitor Drug Discovery and Structural Biology: Future Perspective |
|
|
383 | (1) |
|
|
384 | (11) |
|
17 Serine Proteinases from the Blood Coagulation Cascade |
|
|
395 | (28) |
|
|
|
|
395 | (3) |
|
17.1.1 Some Background of Heart Disease |
|
|
395 | (1) |
|
17.1.2 The Blood Coagulation Cascade |
|
|
395 | (1) |
|
17.1.3 General Background About Serine Proteases |
|
|
396 | (1) |
|
17.1.4 Indirect Coagulation Inhibitors |
|
|
397 | (1) |
|
|
398 | (6) |
|
17.2.1 General Structure and Active Site |
|
|
398 | (1) |
|
|
398 | (2) |
|
|
400 | (1) |
|
17.2.4 Discovery of Direct Thrombin Inhibitors |
|
|
400 | (1) |
|
|
400 | (1) |
|
17.2.6 Hirudin-Derived Thrombin Inhibitors |
|
|
400 | (1) |
|
17.2.7 Thrombin Active Site Inhibitors |
|
|
401 | (1) |
|
|
402 | (1) |
|
|
402 | (1) |
|
17.2.10 The Quest for Orally Available, Non-prodrug Direct Thrombin Inhibitors |
|
|
402 | (2) |
|
|
404 | (7) |
|
17.3.1 Factor Xa Crystal Structure and Active Site |
|
|
404 | (1) |
|
17.3.2 Heparin-Binding Exosite |
|
|
405 | (1) |
|
17.3.3 Discovery of Direct FXa Inhibitors |
|
|
405 | (1) |
|
17.3.4 First-Generation FXa Inhibitors Coritaining Benzamidines |
|
|
405 | (1) |
|
|
405 | (1) |
|
|
407 | (1) |
|
17.3.5 Second-Generation FXa Inhibitors with Neutral S1 Substituents |
|
|
407 | (1) |
|
17.3.5.1 Reversed Binding Mode of Chlorobenzothiophene Substituents |
|
|
407 | (1) |
|
|
408 | (1) |
|
|
409 | (1) |
|
17.3.5.4 The Secret Behind Chloro-aryl Binding in the S1 Pocket |
|
|
409 | (1) |
|
17.3.5.5 Dual Thrombin/FXa Inhibitors |
|
|
410 | (1) |
|
|
411 | (3) |
|
17.4.1 The FVIIa Active Site |
|
|
412 | (1) |
|
|
412 | (1) |
|
17.4.3 Discovery of Direct FVIIa Inhibitors |
|
|
412 | (2) |
|
17.5 Further Developments |
|
|
414 | (1) |
|
|
414 | (1) |
|
|
415 | (1) |
|
17.8 Impact of Structure-Based Drug Design |
|
|
415 | (1) |
|
|
416 | (7) |
|
18 Epigenetic Proteins as Emerging Drug Targets |
|
|
423 | (26) |
|
|
|
423 | (1) |
|
18.2 Acetylation/Deacetylation |
|
|
424 | (6) |
|
18.2.1 Histone Deacetylases |
|
|
425 | (1) |
|
18.2.1.1 Metal Ion-Dependent HDACs |
|
|
425 | (1) |
|
|
427 | (2) |
|
|
429 | (1) |
|
18.2.3 Histone Acetyltransferases |
|
|
430 | (1) |
|
18.3 Methylation/Demethylation |
|
|
430 | (10) |
|
18.3.1 Protein Methyltransferases |
|
|
431 | (1) |
|
18.3.1.1 Inhibition via SAM Competitive Binding: DOT1L |
|
|
432 | (1) |
|
18.3.1.2 Inhibition via Substrate Competitive Binding: EHMT2 |
|
|
432 | (1) |
|
18.3.1.3 Inhibition Through an Allosteric Mechanism: PRMT3 |
|
|
435 | (1) |
|
18.3.1.4 Success Without Structure: EZH2 |
|
|
436 | (1) |
|
|
436 | (1) |
|
18.3.2.1 LSD Demethylases |
|
|
437 | (1) |
|
18.3.2.2 JmjC Demethylases |
|
|
437 | (1) |
|
18.3.2.3 Arginine Deiminases |
|
|
438 | (1) |
|
18.3.3 Methyl-lysine Reader Domains |
|
|
438 | (1) |
|
|
438 | (1) |
|
18.3.3.2 The "Royal Family" |
|
|
438 | (1) |
|
18.3.3.3 WD40 Repeat Domains |
|
|
440 | (1) |
|
18.4 Other Epigenetic Modifications |
|
|
440 | (1) |
|
18.5 The Future of Epigenetic Drug Discovery |
|
|
440 | (1) |
|
|
441 | (1) |
|
|
441 | (8) |
|
19 Impact of Recently Determined Crystallographic Structures of GPCRs on Drug Discovery |
|
|
449 | (30) |
|
|
|
|
|
19.1 G Protein-Coupled Receptors as Pharmaceutical Targets |
|
|
449 | (1) |
|
19.2 Topology and Classes of GPCRs |
|
|
449 | (1) |
|
19.3 GPCR X-Ray Crystal Structures |
|
|
450 | (1) |
|
19.4 Class A GPCR Small Ligand Binding Sites and Druggability |
|
|
451 | (4) |
|
19.5 Class B GPCR X-Ray Crystal Structures |
|
|
455 | (3) |
|
19.6 Class C GPCRs and Allosteric Modulators |
|
|
458 | (1) |
|
|
459 | (2) |
|
19.8 Structure-Based Approaches to GPCR Drug Discovery |
|
|
461 | (12) |
|
|
461 | (7) |
|
19.8.2 Fragment-Based Drug Design |
|
|
468 | (2) |
|
19.8.3 Biophysical Mapping |
|
|
470 | (1) |
|
19.8.4 A Case History of Full SBDD for GPCRs: "High-End" Design |
|
|
470 | (3) |
|
|
473 | (1) |
|
|
473 | (6) |
|
20 Targeting Protein-Protein Interactions Perspective |
|
|
479 | (24) |
|
|
|
|
479 | (1) |
|
20.2 Detection and Analysis of PPIs |
|
|
479 | (3) |
|
|
482 | (1) |
|
20.3.1 Screening Technologies |
|
|
482 | (1) |
|
20.3.2 Fragment-Based Screening Methods |
|
|
482 | (1) |
|
|
483 | (11) |
|
20.4.1 Inhibitors of MDM2-p53: A Breakthrough in PPI Targeting |
|
|
483 | (1) |
|
20.4.1.1 Structure-Based Design of Spirooxindoles as MDM2 Inhibitors |
|
|
484 | (1) |
|
20.4.1.2 Dimer Stabilization: A Mechanism of Dual Inhibition of MDM2/X |
|
|
485 | (1) |
|
20.4.1.3 Other Opportunities for Inhibition |
|
|
485 | (1) |
|
20.4.2 Mimicry of Smac Peptide, IAP Antagonists |
|
|
486 | (1) |
|
20.4.3 Fragment-Based Approaches for BCL Antagonists |
|
|
487 | (1) |
|
20.4.4 Epigenetic Reader Proteins |
|
|
487 | (1) |
|
|
487 | (1) |
|
20.4.4.2 Methyl-lysine Reader Domains |
|
|
490 | (2) |
|
20.4.5 Competitive Antagonists: IL-2 Receptor |
|
|
492 | (2) |
|
|
494 | (1) |
|
20.6 Alternatives to Small-Molecule Orthosteric Inhibition |
|
|
494 | (2) |
|
20.6.1 Protein Degradation |
|
|
494 | (1) |
|
|
495 | (1) |
|
20.7 Conclusion and Perspectives |
|
|
496 | (1) |
|
|
496 | (7) |
|
21 Mass Spectrometry-Based Strategies for Therapeutic Antibodies Extensive Characterization and Optimization (OptimAbs) |
|
|
503 | (18) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
503 | (2) |
|
21.2 Intact mAb Analysis SOS |
|
|
|
|
505 | (1) |
|
|
506 | (1) |
|
21.2.3 Intact mAb Analyses of Hz6F4 Isotypes |
|
|
506 | (1) |
|
21.3 Middle-Up mAb Analysis |
|
|
506 | (2) |
|
21.4 Bottom-Up Peptide Mapping for Primary Structure Assessment |
|
|
508 | (2) |
|
21.5 Top-Down Approaches for mAb Sequencing |
|
|
510 | (3) |
|
21.5.1 Top-Down mAb Analysis |
|
|
510 | (1) |
|
21.5.2 Middle-Down mAb Analysis |
|
|
510 | (3) |
|
21.6 Hydrogen/Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry |
|
|
513 | (1) |
|
21.7 Native MS and Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry (IM-MS) for the Characterization of mAb/Ag Binding Stoichiometry and of Protein Conformation |
|
|
514 | (1) |
|
21.8 From Optimized Antibodies (OptimAbs) to Optimized Antibody-Drug Conjugates (OptimADCs) |
|
|
514 | (1) |
|
|
515 | (1) |
|
|
515 | (1) |
|
|
516 | (5) |
Part IV Challenges and New Frontiers |
|
521 | (128) |
|
22 Integrating Evolution of Drug Resistance into Drug Discovery: Lessons from the Viral Proteases of HIV-1 and HCV |
|
|
523 | (22) |
|
|
|
22.1 Evolution of Antiviral Drug Resistance |
|
|
523 | (5) |
|
22.1.1 Human Immunodeficiency Virus |
|
|
523 | (1) |
|
22.1.2 Structure and Function of HIV-1 Protease |
|
|
523 | (1) |
|
22.1.3 HIV-1 Protease Inhibitors as Antivirals |
|
|
524 | (1) |
|
22.1.4 Viral Resistance to HIV-1 Protease Inhibitors |
|
|
524 | (4) |
|
22.2 Substrate Envelope in Drug Design |
|
|
528 | (2) |
|
22.2.1 Substrate Envelope in HIV Protease |
|
|
528 | (1) |
|
22.2.2 Another Quickly Evolving Virus: Hepatitis C |
|
|
528 | (1) |
|
22.2.3 NS3/4A Protease as an Antiviral Target |
|
|
528 | (2) |
|
22.2.4 Generality of the Substrate Envelope Hypothesis |
|
|
530 | (1) |
|
22.3 Protein Dynamics Is Key to Molecular Recognition |
|
|
530 | (2) |
|
22.3.1 Change in Dynamics as a Drug Resistance Mechanism |
|
|
531 | (1) |
|
22.3.2 Protein Dynamics Is Often Neglected in Drug Design |
|
|
531 | (1) |
|
22.4 Robust Drug Design: Hitting Multiple Targets at a Time |
|
|
532 | (4) |
|
22.4.1 Drug Target's Function and Protein Dynamics |
|
|
532 | (1) |
|
22.4.2 Integrating Dynamics into Drug Discovery While Avoiding Resistance: Dynamic Substrate Envelope |
|
|
533 | (3) |
|
22.4.3 Predicting Substrate Coevolution Using the Dynamic Substrate Envelope |
|
|
536 | (1) |
|
22.5 Future Perspective: Integrating Evolution and Conformational Dynamics into Drug Design |
|
|
536 | (1) |
|
|
537 | (1) |
|
|
537 | (8) |
|
23 A Comprehensive Review on Mycobacterium tuberculosis Targets and Drug Development from a Structural Perspective |
|
|
545 | (22) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
545 | (1) |
|
|
545 | (3) |
|
|
545 | (1) |
|
23.2.2 Epidemiologic Data and Treatment |
|
|
545 | (1) |
|
23.2.3 Current Problems and Risks: The Challenge of a Tuberculosis-Free World |
|
|
546 | (2) |
|
23.3 Mycobacterium tuberculosis |
|
|
548 | (1) |
|
23.3.1 Mycobacterium Species |
|
|
548 | (1) |
|
23.3.2 The Mycobacterium tuberculosis Genome and Proteome |
|
|
548 | (1) |
|
23.3.3 The Structural Proteome of Mycobacterium tuberculosis |
|
|
548 | (1) |
|
23.4 Tuberculosis Drug Discovery and Development |
|
|
549 | (9) |
|
23.4.1 Target Identification |
|
|
549 | (1) |
|
23.4.2 Current Drug Development Pipeline |
|
|
550 | (1) |
|
23.4.3 Structural Studies of Pertinent Enzyme-Drug Complexes |
|
|
550 | (1) |
|
23.4.3.1 Isoniazid and Ethionamide |
|
|
550 | (1) |
|
23.4.3.2 Pyrazinamide Activation Pathway and Target |
|
|
554 | (1) |
|
23.4.3.3 RNA Polymerase and Regulatory Proteins |
|
|
554 | (1) |
|
23.4.3.4 Fluoroquinolones Target DNA Gyrase |
|
|
555 | (1) |
|
23.4.3.5 Examples of TB Drugs in Development and Their Targets |
|
|
557 | (1) |
|
23.5 Conclusion and Perspectives |
|
|
558 | (1) |
|
|
559 | (8) |
|
24 Using Crystal Structures of Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes in Mechanism-Based Modeling for Drug Design |
|
|
567 | (20) |
|
|
|
24.1 Structure-Based Modeling of Cytochrome P450s |
|
|
569 | (6) |
|
|
572 | (2) |
|
24.1.2 CYP2C8, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19 |
|
|
574 | (1) |
|
|
574 | (1) |
|
|
575 | (1) |
|
24.2 Other Phase I Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes |
|
|
575 | (1) |
|
24.3 Phase II Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes |
|
|
576 | (1) |
|
24.4 Interplay Between Metabolism and Inhibition |
|
|
577 | (2) |
|
|
579 | (2) |
|
|
581 | (1) |
|
|
581 | (6) |
|
25 Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: Targets for the Future? |
|
|
587 | (26) |
|
|
|
587 | (7) |
|
25.1.1 Introducing Intrinsically Disordered Proteins |
|
|
587 | (1) |
|
25.1.2 Techniques for Structural Characterization of IDPs and IDPRs |
|
|
588 | (4) |
|
25.1.3 Abundance of IDPs and IDPRs and Their Biological Functions |
|
|
592 | (1) |
|
25.1.4 IDPs/IDPRs in Human Diseases |
|
|
593 | (1) |
|
25.2 IDPs as Novel Drug Targets |
|
|
594 | (1) |
|
25.2.1 Why IDPs? A Brief Overview |
|
|
594 | (1) |
|
25.2.2 Druggability of Ordered Proteins |
|
|
594 | (1) |
|
25.2.2.1 Major Categories of Protein-Directed Drugs |
|
|
594 | (1) |
|
25.3 Molecular Mechanisms of Drugs Targeting Ordered Proteins |
|
|
595 | (1) |
|
25.3.1 Targeting Active Site |
|
|
595 | (1) |
|
25.3.2 Targeting Protein-Protein Interaction Interfaces |
|
|
595 | (1) |
|
25.3.3 Drugs for IDPs and IDPRs |
|
|
595 | (1) |
|
25.4 Disorder-Based Rational Drug Design |
|
|
596 | (1) |
|
25.5 Direct Targeting of IDPs/IDPRs |
|
|
597 | (2) |
|
25.6 Targeting Functionally Misfolded IDPs: A Hypothesis |
|
|
599 | (1) |
|
25.7 Targeting Intrinsically Disordered Structural Ensembles: α-Synuclein as an Illustration |
|
|
599 | (2) |
|
25.8 Targeting Aggregating IDPs |
|
|
601 | (1) |
|
|
602 | (1) |
|
|
603 | (1) |
|
|
603 | (10) |
|
26 Cryo-electron Microscopy as a Tool for Drug Discovery in the Context of Integrative Structural Biology |
|
|
613 | (20) |
|
|
|
|
613 | (1) |
|
26.2 The Resolution Revolution |
|
|
613 | (1) |
|
|
614 | (1) |
|
26.4 The Cryo-EM Single-Particle Analysis Workflow |
|
|
614 | (10) |
|
|
614 | (1) |
|
26.4.2 Screening the Conditions to Obtain an Optimal Sample |
|
|
615 | (1) |
|
26.4.2.1 Differential Scanning Fluorimetry and High-Resolution EM |
|
|
616 | (1) |
|
|
616 | (1) |
|
26.4.3 Sample Vitrification |
|
|
616 | (1) |
|
26.4.4 High-Resolution Cryo-EM |
|
|
617 | (1) |
|
|
617 | (2) |
|
26.4.6 Increasing the Image Contrast |
|
|
619 | (1) |
|
26.4.6.1 Choosing a Suitable Detector |
|
|
620 | (1) |
|
26.4.6.2 Phase Plates to Address Smaller Macromolecular Complexes |
|
|
622 | (1) |
|
26.4.6.3 Beam-Induced Motion Correction and Dose Optimization |
|
|
622 | (1) |
|
26.4.7 Three-Dimensional Reconstruction and Map Interpretation |
|
|
622 | (2) |
|
26.5 Selected Case Studies |
|
|
624 | (3) |
|
26.5.1 The Glutamate Receptor: A Membrane Protein |
|
|
624 | (1) |
|
26.5.2 Visualizing Ligands in High-Resolution Cryo-EM Maps of TRPV1 |
|
|
624 | (1) |
|
26.5.3 Visualizing Large Complexes Without Symmetry: The Ribosome |
|
|
625 | (1) |
|
26.5.4 Visualizing Antigen-Antibody Complexes by Cryo-EM |
|
|
626 | (1) |
|
26.5.5 Cryo-EM and SBDD: Antimalarial Mefloquine Derivatives |
|
|
626 | (1) |
|
26.6 Summary and Conclusion |
|
|
627 | (1) |
|
|
627 | (6) |
|
27 Application of Hard-X-Ray Free-Electron Lasers for Static and Dynamic Processes in Structural Biology |
|
|
633 | (16) |
|
|
|
|
27.1 Introduction: Overview of X-Ray Free-Electron Lasers |
|
|
633 | (1) |
|
27.2 Comparison with Conventional X-Ray Crystallography |
|
|
634 | (2) |
|
27.3 XFEL Structures: Successes Since 2009 |
|
|
636 | (6) |
|
27.3.1 Photosystem I Structure at 8.5 A: Proof of Concept |
|
|
636 | (1) |
|
27.3.2 Lysozyme Structure at 1.9A: Proof of High Resolution |
|
|
637 | (1) |
|
27.3.3 Single-Virus-Particle Imaging: Mimivirus at 30 nm |
|
|
637 | (1) |
|
27.3.4 Cathepsin B Structure at 2.1 A: First Unknown Structural Insight and Use of In Vivo Grown Crystals |
|
|
638 | (1) |
|
27.3.5 Serotonin Receptor Structure at 2.8 A: Room-Temperature Conformation Different from the Cryogenic Structure Solved at Synchrotron |
|
|
639 | (1) |
|
27.3.6 Phycocyanin: A Model Protein to Compare Different Crystal Delivery Methods to Obtain High-Resolution Structures |
|
|
640 | (1) |
|
27.3.7 Photosystem I and Ferredoxin: First Proof of Principle for Time-Resolved Studies |
|
|
640 | (1) |
|
27.3.8 Photosystem II: Unraveling the Water Oxidation Process - An Attempt to Make a Molecular Movie |
|
|
641 | (1) |
|
|
642 | (2) |
|
|
644 | (1) |
|
27.5.1 Comparison of Existing XFELs |
|
|
644 | (1) |
|
|
644 | (1) |
|
|
645 | (1) |
|
|
645 | (4) |
Index |
|
649 | |