Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Supreme Court Policymaking and Race: Origins and Development

(University of Missouri-St. Louis)
  • Formaat - PDF+DRM
  • Hind: 39,73 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • See e-raamat on mõeldud ainult isiklikuks kasutamiseks. E-raamatuid ei saa tagastada.

DRM piirangud

  • Kopeerimine (copy/paste):

    ei ole lubatud

  • Printimine:

    ei ole lubatud

  • Kasutamine:

    Digitaalõiguste kaitse (DRM)
    Kirjastus on väljastanud selle e-raamatu krüpteeritud kujul, mis tähendab, et selle lugemiseks peate installeerima spetsiaalse tarkvara. Samuti peate looma endale  Adobe ID Rohkem infot siin. E-raamatut saab lugeda 1 kasutaja ning alla laadida kuni 6'de seadmesse (kõik autoriseeritud sama Adobe ID-ga).

    Vajalik tarkvara
    Mobiilsetes seadmetes (telefon või tahvelarvuti) lugemiseks peate installeerima selle tasuta rakenduse: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    PC või Mac seadmes lugemiseks peate installima Adobe Digital Editionsi (Seeon tasuta rakendus spetsiaalselt e-raamatute lugemiseks. Seda ei tohi segamini ajada Adober Reader'iga, mis tõenäoliselt on juba teie arvutisse installeeritud )

    Seda e-raamatut ei saa lugeda Amazon Kindle's. 

Examines the origins and development of US Supreme Court policymaking in the area of race between 1801 and 2024.

Supreme Court Policymaking and Race presents a comprehensive and systematic account of the exercise of power by the US Supreme Court in deciding racial policy conflicts beginning with the Marshall Court and ending with the Roberts Court. Author Barbara L. Graham draws upon three related analytic frameworks to evaluate the extent to which the Court's decisions have protected the constitutional and statutory rights of people of color: institutional racial orders, partisan regimes, and jurisprudential regimes. Based on an empirical analysis of the outcomes in 432 race cases decided over fourteen chief justice tenures, Graham provides strong evidence for the claim that with the exception of a fifty-six-year period (1930 until 1986), the Supreme Court has acted as a foe, not a friend, to the rights of people of color. The findings show that when egalitarian political coalitions are in control at the national level, the Court is more likely to further their racial policy goals to protect the legal rights of people of color.

Arvustused

"Graham's book is a stunning work of scholarship. Contrary to the view that the Court acts as protector and guardian of individual rights and liberties, Supreme Court Policymaking and Race demonstrates that the Court, overall and excepting the Warren and Burger Courts, has been a single-minded instrument of social oppression of Black and minority individuals and a premier promoter of White supremacy in the United States." Isaac Unah, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Muu info

Examines the origins and development of US Supreme Court policymaking in the area of race between 1801 and 2024.
Tables
Acknowledgments

Introduction

1. The Marshall and Taney Courts, 18011864

2. The Chase and Waite Courts, 18641888

3. The Fuller, White, and Taft Courts, 18881930

4. The Hughes, Stone, and Vinson Courts, 19301953

5. The Warren Court, 19531969

6. The Burger Court, 19691986

7. The Rehnquist Court, 19862005

8. The Roberts Court, 20052025

Conclusion

References
Case Index
Index
Barbara L. Graham is Associate Professor Emerita at the University of MissouriSt. Louis. She is the author of Social Identity and the Law: Race, Sexuality and Intersectionality.