Acronyms and Abbreviations |
|
xiii | |
The Key Messages of the Book |
|
xv | |
Outline of the Book |
|
xix | |
References |
|
xxii | |
|
Part I Generalized TP Model Transformation |
|
|
|
|
3 | (8) |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
1.3 TP Model of qLPV Systems |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
1.4 TP Model: TS Fuzzy Model |
|
|
6 | (2) |
|
1.5 HOSVD and Quasi-HOSVD Based Canonical Form of TP Functions |
|
|
8 | (3) |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
2 Algorithms of the TP Model Transformation |
|
|
11 | (54) |
|
2.1 Original TP Model Transformation |
|
|
11 | (6) |
|
|
14 | (3) |
|
2.2 Bi-Linear TP Model Transformation |
|
|
17 | (7) |
|
|
22 | (2) |
|
2.3 Enriched TP Model Transformation |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
2.4 Convex TP Model Transformation: Convex Hull Manipulation |
|
|
25 | (10) |
|
|
28 | (7) |
|
2.5 Pseudo TP Model Transformation |
|
|
35 | (8) |
|
2.6 Partial TP+ Model Transformation |
|
|
43 | (5) |
|
|
44 | (4) |
|
2.7 Multi TP Model Transformation |
|
|
48 | (4) |
|
|
49 | (3) |
|
2.8 Generalized TP Model Transformation |
|
|
52 | (2) |
|
2.9 Interpolation of the Weighting Functions |
|
|
54 | (5) |
|
|
55 | (4) |
|
2.10 Unifying the Weighting Functions |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
2.11 Operations Between TP Functions |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
2.12 Towards Approximation in Case of Non-TP Functions |
|
|
61 | (4) |
|
|
62 | (3) |
|
Part II TP Model Transformation Based Control Design and Optimalization Frameworks |
|
|
|
3 TP Model Transformation is a Gateway Between Identification and Design |
|
|
65 | (4) |
|
|
66 | (3) |
|
4 TP Model Transformation Based Control Design Structure |
|
|
69 | (4) |
|
|
71 | (2) |
|
5 General Stability Verification and Control Design |
|
|
73 | (14) |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
|
74 | (3) |
|
5.3 Decoupling the Design, Optimization, and Stability Verification: Generalized Design Frameworks |
|
|
77 | (10) |
|
5.3.1 Multi-Way Convex Manipulation |
|
|
79 | (3) |
|
5.3.2 Main and Independent TP Model Component Analysis via the HOSVD Based Canonical Form |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
5.3.3 Convex Hull Manipulation |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
5.3.4 LMI Based System Design |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
5.3.5 Exact System Reconstruction: Unified TP Model Forms |
|
|
84 | (2) |
|
5.3.6 LMI Based Stability Verification |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
6 TP1 Model Transformation for the Class of Non-qLPV Models |
|
|
87 | (4) |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
6.2 TP1 Model Transformation |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
6.3 Example of Re-identification |
|
|
89 | (2) |
|
|
89 | (2) |
|
7 TPτ Model Transformation for Systems Including Time Delay |
|
|
91 | (4) |
|
7.1 TPτ Model Transformation |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
7.2 Example of the TPτ Model Transformation |
|
|
92 | (3) |
|
|
93 | (2) |
|
Part III Analysis of the TP Model Based Design Frameworks via a Complex Example |
|
|
|
|
95 | (2) |
|
8 qLPV Model of the 3DoF Prototypical Aeroelastic Wing Section |
|
|
97 | (6) |
|
|
97 | (3) |
|
8.2 Including Stribeck Friction |
|
|
100 | (3) |
|
|
101 | (2) |
|
9 TP Model Based Control Design |
|
|
103 | (14) |
|
9.1 Exact and Convex TP Model of the 3DoF Aeroelastic Wing Section |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
|
104 | (2) |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
9.4 Results of the Control Design |
|
|
107 | (10) |
|
9.4.1 Controller 1: Asymptotic Stabilization and Decay Rate Control |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
9.4.2 Controller 2: Constraint on the Control Value |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
9.4.3 Controller 3: State Feedback Control Including Stribeck Friction |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
|
109 | (6) |
|
|
115 | (2) |
|
10 Convex Hull Manipulation Based Optimization |
|
|
117 | (14) |
|
10.1 Convex Hull Manipulation Based Design Framework |
|
|
117 | (3) |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
10.1.2 Step 1: Convex TP Models |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
10.1.3 Step 2: Convex TP Model Interpolation |
|
|
118 | (2) |
|
10.1.4 Step 3: LMI Based Design and Stability Verification |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
10.2 Numerical Simulations |
|
|
120 | (11) |
|
10.2.1 Determination of the Feasibility Region |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
10.2.2 Results of the Numerical Simulations |
|
|
121 | (10) |
|
11 Complexity Manipulation Based Optimization |
|
|
131 | (14) |
|
11.1 The Control Design Framework |
|
|
131 | (7) |
|
11.1.1 Main TP Model Component Analysis: HOSVD Based Canonical Form of the Model |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
11.1.2 LMI Based System Design |
|
|
133 | (4) |
|
11.1.3 Exact System Reconstruction: Unified Weightings in the Polytopes |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
11.1.4 LMI Based Stability Verification |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
11.2 Evaluation of the Benefits of the Proposed Control Design |
|
|
138 | (7) |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
12 TP Model Manipulation Influences the Control Performance and the Feasibility of LMI Based Design |
|
|
145 | (17) |
|
|
145 | (9) |
|
12.1.1 Initialization of the Numerical Analysis |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
12.1.2 Results of the 2D Analysis: Feasibility and Convex Hull |
|
|
146 | (2) |
|
12.1.3 Results of the 3D Analysis: Feasibility, Convex Hull, and Complexity |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
12.1.4 Results of the 4D Analysis: Feasibility, Convex Hull, Complexity, and Parameter Space |
|
|
148 | (6) |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
|
154 | (6) |
|
12.2.1 Control Performance Results of the Numerical Simulation |
|
|
154 | (2) |
|
12.2.2 Evaluation and Comparison of the Derived Cases and the Best Solution |
|
|
156 | (4) |
|
|
160 | (2) |
|
Part IV TP Model Based Control Design of the Dual-Excenter Vibration Actuator |
|
|
|
|
162 | (3) |
|
13 qLPV Model of the Dual Excenter Vibration System |
|
|
165 | (6) |
|
|
170 | (1) |
|
14 Convex TP Model of the Dual Excenter Vibration System |
|
|
171 | (8) |
|
14.1 The Quasi-HOSVD Based Canonical Form: Approximation and Complexity Trade-Off |
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
|
172 | (7) |
|
15 Derivation of the Controller |
|
|
179 | (8) |
|
15.1 LMI Based Controller Design |
|
|
179 | (3) |
|
|
182 | (5) |
|
|
184 | (3) |
|
Part V Control of the Impedance Model Including Varying Time Delay via TPτ Model Transformation |
|
|
|
16 Impedance Control for Force Reflecting Telemanipulation |
|
|
187 | (8) |
|
16.1 Impedance Control with Feedback Delay |
|
|
188 | (2) |
|
16.2 Control Structure for Stability Preservation |
|
|
190 | (5) |
|
|
193 | (2) |
|
17 Impedance Model with Varying Feedback Delay in TP Model Form |
|
|
195 | (22) |
|
17.1 The Quasi-HOSVD Based Canonical Form |
|
|
195 | (4) |
|
17.1.1 Exact Quasi-HOSVD Based Canonical Form |
|
|
195 | (3) |
|
17.1.2 Executing Trade-off by TPτ Model Transformation |
|
|
198 | (1) |
|
17.2 Manipulation of the Convex Hull |
|
|
199 | (12) |
|
17.2.1 The Vertices of the Exact TP Model |
|
|
204 | (4) |
|
17.2.2 The 5 Vertices of the Reduced TP Model |
|
|
208 | (2) |
|
17.2.3 The 4 Vertices of the Reduced TP Model |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
17.2.4 The 3 Vertices of the Reduced TP Model |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
17.3 Validation of the Convex TP Model |
|
|
211 | (6) |
|
17.3.1 Constant Time-Delay |
|
|
212 | (2) |
|
17.3.2 Varying Time-Delay |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
|
215 | (2) |
|
18 TPτ Transformation Based Control Design for Impedance Controlled Robot Gripper |
|
|
217 | |
|
|
217 | (1) |
|
18.2 Execution of the TPτ Model Transformation |
|
|
218 | (1) |
|
18.3 LMI-Based Multi-Objective Controller and Observer Design |
|
|
218 | (1) |
|
18.4 Resulting Controller and Observer Gains |
|
|
219 | (2) |
|
18.4.1 Controller-Observer 1 |
|
|
220 | (1) |
|
18.4.2 Controller-Observer 2 |
|
|
220 | (1) |
|
18.4.3 Controller-Observer 3 |
|
|
221 | (1) |
|
18.5 Evaluation and Validation of the Control Design |
|
|
221 | |
|
|
230 | |