Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Transitional Justice, Judicial Accountability and the Rule of Law

(University of Strathclyde, UK)
  • Formaat: PDF+DRM
  • Sari: Transitional Justice
  • Ilmumisaeg: 28-Apr-2010
  • Kirjastus: Routledge
  • Keel: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780203851753
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Formaat - PDF+DRM
  • Hind: 97,50 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • See e-raamat on mõeldud ainult isiklikuks kasutamiseks. E-raamatuid ei saa tagastada.
  • Raamatukogudele
  • Formaat: PDF+DRM
  • Sari: Transitional Justice
  • Ilmumisaeg: 28-Apr-2010
  • Kirjastus: Routledge
  • Keel: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780203851753
Teised raamatud teemal:

DRM piirangud

  • Kopeerimine (copy/paste):

    ei ole lubatud

  • Printimine:

    ei ole lubatud

  • Kasutamine:

    Digitaalõiguste kaitse (DRM)
    Kirjastus on väljastanud selle e-raamatu krüpteeritud kujul, mis tähendab, et selle lugemiseks peate installeerima spetsiaalse tarkvara. Samuti peate looma endale  Adobe ID Rohkem infot siin. E-raamatut saab lugeda 1 kasutaja ning alla laadida kuni 6'de seadmesse (kõik autoriseeritud sama Adobe ID-ga).

    Vajalik tarkvara
    Mobiilsetes seadmetes (telefon või tahvelarvuti) lugemiseks peate installeerima selle tasuta rakenduse: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    PC või Mac seadmes lugemiseks peate installima Adobe Digital Editionsi (Seeon tasuta rakendus spetsiaalselt e-raamatute lugemiseks. Seda ei tohi segamini ajada Adober Reader'iga, mis tõenäoliselt on juba teie arvutisse installeeritud )

    Seda e-raamatut ei saa lugeda Amazon Kindle's. 

With a Foreword by Professor Abimbola Olowofoyeku, Brunel University

'This book makes a distinct contribution to our understanding of the challenges facing transitional justice institutions by shining fresh light on the need for finding effective mechanisms for holding judges accountable for their participation in authoritarian political orders.'-Frantois Du Bois, School of Law, University of Nottingham

'Too much has been excused in the name of a surface legality, of a professed duty to uphold law even where it blatantly conflicts with justice under authoritarian rule. Through a pain-staking analysis of the institutions of his home country, Nigeria, Yusuf mounts a careful but devastating critique on judicial subterfuge and institutional evasion. This is a fine book. There is rigour in the analysis and an urgency in the writing, in the imperative that judges face up to their responsibility, that the 'accountability gap' be redressed, that complicity not be forgotten or excused.'-Emilios Christodoulidis, Law School, University of Glasgow

Transitional Justice, Judicial Accountability and the Rule of Law addresses the importance of judicial accountability in transitional justice processes. Despite a general consensus that the judiciary plays an important role in contemporary governance, accountability for the judicial role in formerly authoritarian societies remains largely elided and under-researched. Hakeem O. Yusuf argues that the purview of transitional justice mechanisms should, as a matter of policy, be extended to scrutiny of the judicial role in the past. Through a critical comparative approach that cuts through the transitioning experiences of post-authoritarian and post-conflict polities in Latin America, Asia, Europe and Africa, the book focuses specifically on Nigeria. It demonstrates that public accountability of the judiciary through the mechanism of a truth-seeking process is a necessary component in securing comprehensive accountability for the judicial role in the past. Transitional Justice, Judicial Accountability and the Rule of Law further shows that an across-the-board transformation of state institutions - an important aspiration of transitional processes - is virtually impossible without incorporating the third branch of government, the judiciary, into the accountability process.

Arvustused

'In less than 200 pages, the author covers general questions of judicial accountability and the judicialisation of politics (Chapters 1 and 6); applies these questions to transitional contexts (Chapters 3 and 5); analyzes the specifics of judicial accountability in the Nigerian case (Chapters 4 and 7) and advances an analysis about the appropriateness of truth commissions for delivering judicial accountability (Chapter 2). In this respect, the book is a tour de force' - Catherine O'Rourke, University of Ulster, UK for Social & Legal Studies (2013)

Acknowledgments ix
Foreword xi
Professor Abimbola Olowofoyeku
Introduction: transitional justice, judicial accountability and the rule of law 1(6)
1 The case for judicial accountability in transitions 7(26)
Introduction
7(1)
State powers and the judiciary
8(4)
The judiciary in authoritarian contexts
12(1)
Judicial accountability and rule of law
13(1)
The case for accountability of the judiciary in transitions
14(13)
Judicial independence
17(5)
Judicial immunity
22(1)
The judiciary as victim
23(2)
Judging the judges?
25(2)
Conclusion
27(6)
2 Truth, transition, and accountability of the judiciary 33(17)
Introduction
33(1)
The judiciary and accountability for the past — the truth commission as an unlikely forum
34(6)
Transition, truth and accountability in Nigeria
40(5)
The context
40(2)
Wither accountability of the judiciary?
42(2)
The Dele Giwa petition: truth-seeking and the judiciary in Nigeria's transition
44(1)
Conclusion
45(5)
3 Political change and judicial reform: an international' and comparative perspective 50(18)
Introduction
50(1)
Judicial reform – the international context
51(4)
A comparative perspective
55(9)
Central and Eastern Europe: political change, courts and constitutionalism
56(5)
Institutional transformation sans accountability? The case of Nigeria's National Judicial Council
61(3)
Conclusion
64(4)
4 Judicial accountability in political transitions the Nigerian context 68(22)
Introduction
68(1)
The transition judiciary: a legal premise for accountability
69(3)
The accountability gap
72(2)
Legal-Jurisprudential dimension
74(5)
Legitimizing military rule
74(3)
Imperatives of popular sovereignty
77(2)
Socio-political dimension
79(5)
Corrupt and compromised
79(1)
Public apathy for due process of law
80(2)
Unacknowledged victims?
82(2)
Conclusion
84(6)
5 Rights, the judiciary and constitutionalism in transitions 90(38)
Introduction
90(2)
Judicial review in the Nigerian court system
92(1)
Backwards with plain-fact jurisprudence: the Oputa Panel care
93(14)
The facts, the decision
93(1)
Between executive failure and judicial complacency
94(2)
Again, the ride of kw dilemma
96(1)
The judiciary, transition and the transformative agenda
97(3)
Safety in a cocoon: ignoring international human rights law
100(2)
Privileging domestic law over international law
102(1)
Policy considerations and transitional justice claims
103(4)
Two decisions and the purposive approach: hopes for transformation?
107(1)
The PDP case: when death is not to die
107(1)
A Lacuna, a Formidable Minority and a Slim Majority
107(2)
Breaking away from tradition
109(1)
The ICPC case: Federalism v Commonweal
110(1)
From the doldrums of infamy
110(3)
'Policy united' all the way
113(2)
Validity of purposive jurisprudence in Nigeria's transition
115(3)
Displacing formalism in transitional contexts
115(1)
Deepening the rule of law in transitional contexts
116(2)
Beyond provincialism
118(1)
Peace, order and good governance to the rescue
118(1)
Discordant tunes
119(2)
Ambivalence or new directions?
119(2)
Conclusion
121(7)
6 Transition and the judicialization of politics: dialectics of a phenomenon 128(27)
Introduction
128(2)
Judicialization of politics, democracy and the rule of law
130(1)
Judicialization of politics and the counter-majoritarian argument
131(5)
Judicialization of politics: an analytical framework
136(4)
Comparative perspectives
140(4)
A still-born constitutional court: legacy of a failed transition and judiciary
144(1)
Court-packing versus judicial independence
145(4)
Conclusion
149(6)
7 Courts to the rescue? The judicialization of politics in Nigeria 155(28)
Introduction
155(1)
Democratic transition and judicialization of politics in Nigeria
156(4)
The judiciary in institutional reconstruction
157(3)
The Ladoja case: the Godfather versus the people
160(5)
The socio-political background
160(1)
Neither impeachment nor removal
160(1)
Courts and the political question
161(2)
Checkmating judicial impunity
163(2)
The Obi Tenure case — speaking law to power
165(4)
Towards a new constitutionalism
166(1)
Timely intervention and checkmating electoral impunity
167(2)
Ladoja (No. 2) — between sympathy and the law
169(1)
No to tenure-elongation — the court is plain
169(1)
The judge in the court of the people
170(3)
Turning the tables? Politicization of the judiciary in Nigeria
173(4)
Conclusion
177(6)
Conclusion 183(5)
Bibliography 188(13)
Index 201
Hakeem O. Yusuf is a lecturer in Law at Queen's University, Belfast.