Preface |
|
xi | |
Authors |
|
xvii | |
Acknowledgements |
|
xix | |
|
1 Systems Thinking and Incident Causation |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
1.2 Introduction to Systems Thinking |
|
|
2 | (2) |
|
1.3 Systems Thinking Applied |
|
|
4 | (2) |
|
1.4 Systems Thinking Models |
|
|
6 | (7) |
|
1.5 Implications for Incident and Reporting Systems |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
14 | (3) |
|
2 Systems Thinking and Incident Analysis |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
2.1 Introduction to Incident Analysis |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
|
18 | (2) |
|
|
20 | (2) |
|
|
22 | (2) |
|
2.5 Accimap, CAST, and HFACS Applied |
|
|
24 | (12) |
|
2.6 Summary and Conclusions |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
|
37 | (2) |
|
3 A Process Model for Developing an Incident Reporting System |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
3.2 Overview of the Process Model |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
3.3 The Development Sequence |
|
|
40 | (2) |
|
3.4 Stage 1: Understand the Context |
|
|
42 | (2) |
|
3.5 Stage 2: The Accident Analysis Method |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
3.6 Stage 3: Data Collection Protocol |
|
|
45 | (6) |
|
3.7 Stage 4: Learning from Incidents Process |
|
|
51 | (2) |
|
3.8 Stage 5: Software Tools and Training Materials |
|
|
53 | (3) |
|
3.9 Stage 6: Implementating-Evaluating Data Quality |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
3.10 Criteria for Designing and Evaluating Incident Reporting Systems |
|
|
57 | (2) |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
|
59 | (4) |
|
4 Understanding the Context |
|
|
63 | (14) |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
4.2 The Context for This Case Study |
|
|
64 | (2) |
|
4.3 Injury and Incident Data Collection in Australia Prior to UPLOADS |
|
|
66 | (2) |
|
4.4 State of Knowledge in the LOA Domain |
|
|
68 | (3) |
|
4.5 Summary and Next Steps |
|
|
71 | (2) |
|
|
73 | (4) |
|
5 Identifying the Needs and Priorities of End Users |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
|
78 | (11) |
|
5.3 Summary and Next Steps |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
|
90 | (3) |
|
6 Adapting Accimap for Use in an Incident Reporting System |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
6.2 Tasks Involved in Adapting Accimap |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
6.3 Adapting the Levels on the Accimap Framework |
|
|
94 | (3) |
|
6.4 Developing a Contributory Factor Classification Scheme |
|
|
97 | (10) |
|
6.5 Summary and Next Steps |
|
|
107 | (3) |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
|
110 | (2) |
|
Appendix: Literature Review References |
|
|
112 | (3) |
|
7 Evaluating Reliability and Validity |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
7.2 What Is Reliability and Validity? |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
7.3 Step-by-Step Guide to Evaluating Reliability and Validity |
|
|
117 | (7) |
|
7.4 Evaluating the UPLOADS Classification Scheme |
|
|
124 | (7) |
|
7.5 Conclusions and Next Steps |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
|
132 | (3) |
|
8 Designing a Prototype Incident Reporting System |
|
|
135 | (16) |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
|
136 | (2) |
|
8.3 Prototype Data Collection Protocol |
|
|
138 | (4) |
|
8.4 Prototype Learning from Incidents Process |
|
|
142 | (2) |
|
8.5 Prototype Software Tool |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
8.6 Prototype Training Material |
|
|
145 | (3) |
|
8.7 Summary and Next Steps |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
|
149 | (2) |
|
|
151 | (12) |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
9.3 Step-by-Step Guide to Evaluating Usability |
|
|
152 | (4) |
|
9.4 Evaluating the Usability of the UPLOADS Prototype |
|
|
156 | (3) |
|
9.5 Summary and Next Steps |
|
|
159 | (3) |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
10 Evaluating Data Quality |
|
|
163 | (14) |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
10.2 What Is Data Quality? |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
10.3 Step-by-Step Guide to Undertaking an Implementation Trial... |
|
|
165 | (3) |
|
10.4 Evaluating the Data Quality of the UPLOADS Prototype |
|
|
168 | (8) |
|
10.5 Summary and Next Steps |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
11 Outputs from the Development Process - UPLOADS |
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
11.2 Accident Analysis Method |
|
|
178 | (2) |
|
11.3 Data Collection Protocol |
|
|
180 | (6) |
|
11.4 The Process for Learning from Incidents |
|
|
186 | (2) |
|
11.5 Supporting Software Tools |
|
|
188 | (3) |
|
|
191 | (2) |
|
|
193 | (1) |
|
|
193 | (2) |
|
12 Analyzing Incident Data |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
12.2 Step-by-Step Guide to Analyzing Incident Data |
|
|
196 | (4) |
|
12.3 Analysis of Data Collected via UPLOADS |
|
|
200 | (11) |
|
12.4 Implications for Understanding and Preventing Incidents |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
12.5 Summary and Next Steps |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
|
213 | (2) |
|
13 Designing Incident Prevention Strategies |
|
|
215 | (16) |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
13.2 Step-by-Step Guide to Designing Incident Prevention Strategies |
|
|
216 | (5) |
|
13.3 UPLOADS Incident Prevention Strategy Design Process |
|
|
221 | (9) |
|
13.4 Summary and Conclusions |
|
|
230 | (1) |
|
|
230 | (1) |
|
14 Lessons Learned, Future Research Directions, and the Incident Reporting Systems of Tomorrow |
|
|
231 | (12) |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
14.2 Key Findings and Lessons Learned |
|
|
232 | (3) |
|
14.3 Further Research on Incident Reporting Systems |
|
|
235 | (2) |
|
14.4 Incident Reporting in 2050 |
|
|
237 | (2) |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
|
240 | (1) |
|
|
240 | (3) |
Appendix A UPLOADS Contributory Factor Classification Scheme |
|
243 | (10) |
Appendix B Examples of Coding Tasks for Reliability and Validity Assessments |
|
253 | (4) |
Appendix C UPLOADS Incident Report Form |
|
257 | (6) |
Appendix D Training Manual: The UPLOADS Approach to Accident Analysis |
|
263 | (18) |
Index |
|
281 | |