Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: The UK Constitution after Miller: Brexit and Beyond

Edited by (University of Cambridge), Edited by (University of Cambridge, UK), Edited by
  • Formaat: 328 pages
  • Ilmumisaeg: 26-Jul-2018
  • Kirjastus: Hart Publishing
  • ISBN-13: 9781509916429
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Formaat - EPUB+DRM
  • Hind: 52,64 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • See e-raamat on mõeldud ainult isiklikuks kasutamiseks. E-raamatuid ei saa tagastada.
  • Formaat: 328 pages
  • Ilmumisaeg: 26-Jul-2018
  • Kirjastus: Hart Publishing
  • ISBN-13: 9781509916429
Teised raamatud teemal:

DRM piirangud

  • Kopeerimine (copy/paste):

    ei ole lubatud

  • Printimine:

    ei ole lubatud

  • Kasutamine:

    Digitaalõiguste kaitse (DRM)
    Kirjastus on väljastanud selle e-raamatu krüpteeritud kujul, mis tähendab, et selle lugemiseks peate installeerima spetsiaalse tarkvara. Samuti peate looma endale  Adobe ID Rohkem infot siin. E-raamatut saab lugeda 1 kasutaja ning alla laadida kuni 6'de seadmesse (kõik autoriseeritud sama Adobe ID-ga).

    Vajalik tarkvara
    Mobiilsetes seadmetes (telefon või tahvelarvuti) lugemiseks peate installeerima selle tasuta rakenduse: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    PC või Mac seadmes lugemiseks peate installima Adobe Digital Editionsi (Seeon tasuta rakendus spetsiaalselt e-raamatute lugemiseks. Seda ei tohi segamini ajada Adober Reader'iga, mis tõenäoliselt on juba teie arvutisse installeeritud )

    Seda e-raamatut ei saa lugeda Amazon Kindle's. 

The judgment of the UK Supreme Court in R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union is of fundamental legal, constitutional and political significance. The Supreme Court's judgment discussed the relative powers of Parliament and the Government, the relationship between Westminster and the devolved legislatures, and the extent to which the UK's membership of the EU had changed the UK constitution, both prior to and even after departure. It also provided further evidence of the emerging role of the UK's Supreme Court as a constitutional court, despite the lack of a codified constitution in the UK.

This edited collection critically evaluates the decision in Miller, providing a detailed analysis of the reasoning in the judgment and its longer-term consequences for the UK constitution through the period of Brexit and beyond. The case is used as a lens through which to evaluate the modern UK constitution and its potential future evolution. Whatever form Brexit may eventually take, the impact that EU membership and the triggering of Brexit has already had on the UK's constitutional settlement is profound. The book will be of great value to anyone interested in the effect of the Miller case and Brexit on the UK's constitution.

Arvustused

The largest compliment which this book can be paid is that it takes a case which was surrounded by partisan, and at times hysterical, arguments from both sides of the Brexit debate and has subjected the decision to rigorous, scholarly analysis. Every contribution to this book makes a significant entry into the academic discourse and I have no doubt that many of the essays will be subject to scrutiny and debate for many years to come. -- David Blair, Anderson Strathern * Edinburgh Law Review * As Brexit continues to unfold in 2019, the various chapters in this volume will be good resources for those who wish to gain a greater understanding of the constitutional ramifications of the UK leaving the EU, and the ongoing development of the UK Supreme Court. -- Alexander Hudson, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity * ICONnect * Through twelve carefully put together contributions by pre-eminent figures in the UK constitutional landscape, The UK Constitution After Miller effectively tackles all different facets of the judgment. -- Eleni Frantziou * Common Market Law Review *

Muu info

This book is the leading statement on the UK constitution since the seminal case of Miller, which held that it is for Parliament not the executive to decide whether the UK invokes Article 50 to leave the EU, following the UK's referendum on the issue.
Foreword v
Sir Stephen Sedley
List of Contributors
ix
1 The Miller Tale: An Introduction
1(38)
Mark Elliott
Jack Williams
Alison L. Young
2 Prerogative Powers After Miller: An Analysis in Four E's
39(30)
Jack Williams
3 Miller and the Prerogative
69(22)
Anne Twomey
4 Miller, Treaty Making and the Rights of Subjects
91(18)
Eirik Bjorge
5 Miller, EU Law and the UK
109(22)
Paul Craig
6 Of Power Cables and Bridges: Individual Rights and Retrospectivity in Miller and Beyond
131(24)
David Howarth
7 Constitutional Change and Territorial Consent: The Miller Case and the Sewel Convention
155(26)
Aileen McHarg
8 Sovereignty, Consent and Constitutions: The Northern Ireland References
181(22)
Gordon Anthony
9 The Miller Case and Constitutional Statutes
203(18)
Sir John Laws
10 Sovereignty, Primacy and the Common Law Constitution: What Has EU Membership Taught Us?
221(28)
Morit Elliott
11 Miller, Constitutional Realism and the Politics of Brexit
249(28)
Richard Ekins
Graham Gee
12 Miller and the Future of Constitutional Adjudication
277(30)
Alison L. Young
Index 307
Mark Elliott is Professor of Public Law at the University of Cambridge, and Fellow of St Catherine's College, Cambridge. Jack Williams is a Barrister at Monckton Chambers, London. Alison L Young is the Sir David Williams Professor of Public Law at the University of Cambridge.