|
1 Virtual Testing and Its Application in Aerospace Structural Parts |
|
|
1 | |
|
|
|
1.1 Introduction to the Virtual Testing |
|
|
2 | |
|
1.2 Virtual Testing Theory and Fracture Toughness |
|
|
2 | |
|
1.3 The Extended Griffith Theory and Fracture Toughness |
|
|
3 | |
|
1.4 Extension of Farahmand's Theory to Fatigue Crack Growth Rate Data |
|
|
6 | |
|
1.4.1 The Accelerated Region and Fracture Toughness |
|
|
6 | |
|
1.4.2 The Paris Constants, C and n |
|
|
7 | |
|
1.4.3 The Threshold Value (Region I) |
|
|
8 | |
|
1.4.4 The da/dN Versus ΔK from Virtual Testing Against Test Data |
|
|
9 | |
|
1.5 Application of Virtual Testing in Aerospace Industry: Introduction |
|
|
12 | |
|
|
13 | |
|
1.5.2 Manufacturing Process and Plastic Deformation of COPV Liner |
|
|
14 | |
|
1.5.3 Generating Fracture Allowables of Inconel 718 of COPV Liner Through Virtual Testing Technique |
|
|
16 | |
|
1.5.4 Generating Fracture Allowables of 6061-T6 Aluminum Tank Through Virtual Testing Technique |
|
|
20 | |
|
1.6 Summary and Future Work |
|
|
22 | |
|
|
23 | |
|
|
28 | |
|
2 Tools for Assessing the Damage Tolerance of Primary Structural Components |
|
|
29 | |
|
|
|
|
29 | |
|
2.2 An Equivalent Block Method for Predicting Fatigue Crack Growth |
|
|
32 | |
|
2.3 Fatigue Crack Growth under Variable Amplitude Loading |
|
|
33 | |
|
2.3.1 Fatigue Crack Growth in an F/A-18 Aircraft Bulkhead |
|
|
36 | |
|
2.3.2 Crack Growth in Mil Annealed Ti-6AL-4V under a Fighter Spectrum |
|
|
38 | |
|
2.4 A Virtual Engineering Approach for Predicting the S–N Curves for 7050-T7451 |
|
|
40 | |
|
2.4.1 Computing the Endurance Limit |
|
|
41 | |
|
|
41 | |
|
Appendix: Formulae for Computing the Crack Opening Stress |
|
|
43 | |
|
|
44 | |
|
3 Cohesive Technology Applied to the Modeling and Simulation of Fatigue Failure |
|
|
47 | |
|
|
|
|
47 | |
|
|
49 | |
|
3.2.1 Models for the Prediction of Threshold Fatigue Crack Behavior |
|
|
49 | |
|
3.2.2 Models for the Prediction of Fatigue Crack Propagation |
|
|
50 | |
|
3.3 Cohesive Modeling Technique |
|
|
51 | |
|
3.3.1 Reversible Cohesive Model |
|
|
53 | |
|
3.3.2 A Bilinear Cohesive Law |
|
|
54 | |
|
3.3.3 A Cohesive Model Suitable for Fatigue Failure |
|
|
56 | |
|
3.3.4 Incorporation of Threshold Behavior |
|
|
58 | |
|
3.3.5 Finite Element Implementation |
|
|
59 | |
|
|
61 | |
|
3.4.1 Paris Curve Simulation |
|
|
61 | |
|
3.4.2 Prediction of Threshold Limit of Fatigue Crack Growth |
|
|
65 | |
|
3.4.3 Effect of on the Threshold Limit |
|
|
66 | |
|
3.4.4 Effect of Load Ratio R on Fatigue Crack Threshold |
|
|
68 | |
|
|
69 | |
|
|
69 | |
|
4 Fatigue Damage Map as a Virtual Tool for Fatigue Damage Tolerance |
|
|
73 | |
|
|
|
|
73 | |
|
4.2 The Basic Understanding of Fatigue Damage |
|
|
74 | |
|
4.2.1 Development of Fatigue Cracks and Fatigue Damage Stages |
|
|
74 | |
|
4.2.2 Stage II Fatigue Cracking |
|
|
77 | |
|
4.2.3 Stage I Fatigue Cracking |
|
|
78 | |
|
4.2.4 Stage III Fatigue Cracks |
|
|
84 | |
|
4.3 Fatigue Damage Map the Basic Rationale – The Navarro–de los Rios Model |
|
|
85 | |
|
4.3.1 Fatigue Damage Map – Defining the Stages of Fatigue Damage |
|
|
89 | |
|
4.3.2 Fatigue Damage Map – Defining the Propagation Rate of Fatigue Stages |
|
|
97 | |
|
|
101 | |
|
|
101 | |
|
5 Predicting Creep and Creep/Fatigue Crack Initiation and Growth for Virtual Testing and Life Assessment of Components |
|
|
105 | |
|
|
|
|
106 | |
|
5.1.1 Background to Life Assessment Codes |
|
|
106 | |
|
5.1.2 Creep Analysis of Uncracked Bodies |
|
|
107 | |
|
5.1.3 Physical Models Describing Creep |
|
|
108 | |
|
5.1.4 Complex Stress Creep |
|
|
110 | |
|
5.1.5 Influence of Fatigue in Uncracked Bodies |
|
|
112 | |
|
5.2 Fracture Mechanics Parameters in Creep and Fatigue |
|
|
113 | |
|
5.2.1 Creep Parameter C* Integral |
|
|
114 | |
|
5.3 Predictive Models in High-Temperature Fracture Mechanics |
|
|
116 | |
|
5.3.1 Derivation of K and C* |
|
|
116 | |
|
5.3.2 Example of CCG Correlation with K and C* |
|
|
117 | |
|
5.3.3 Modelling Steady-State Creep Crack Growth Rate |
|
|
118 | |
|
5.3.4 Transient Creep Crack Growth Modelling |
|
|
121 | |
|
5.3.5 Predictions of Initiation Times ti Prior Onset of Steady Creep Crack Growth |
|
|
124 | |
|
5.3.6 Consideration of Crack Tip Angle in the NSW Model |
|
|
125 | |
|
5.3.7 The New NSW-MOD Model |
|
|
126 | |
|
5.3.8 Finite Element Framework |
|
|
127 | |
|
5.3.9 Damage Accumulation at the Crack Tip |
|
|
128 | |
|
5.3.10 Elevated Temperature Cyclic Crack Growth |
|
|
130 | |
|
|
131 | |
|
5.5 Nomenclatures and Abbreviations |
|
|
133 | |
|
|
134 | |
|
6 Computational Approach Toward Advanced Composite Material Qualification and Structural Certification |
|
|
137 | |
|
Frank Abdi, J. Surdenas, Nasir Munir, Jerry Housner, and Raju Keshavanarayana |
|
|
|
|
137 | |
|
|
138 | |
|
6.2.1 FAA Durability and Damage Tolerance Certification Strategy |
|
|
138 | |
|
6.2.2 Damage Categories and Comparison of Analysis Methods and Test Results |
|
|
139 | |
|
6.2.3 FAA Building-Block Approach |
|
|
148 | |
|
6.2.4 Test Reduction Process |
|
|
151 | |
|
6.3 Computational Process for Implementing Building-Block Verification |
|
|
153 | |
|
6.3.1 Multiple Failure Criteria |
|
|
154 | |
|
6.3.2 Micro- and Macro-Composite Mechanics Analysis |
|
|
156 | |
|
6.3.3 Progressive Failure Micro-Mechanical Analysis |
|
|
157 | |
|
6.3.4 Calibration of Composite Constitutive Properties |
|
|
158 | |
|
6.3.5 Composite Material Validation |
|
|
159 | |
|
6.3.6 Material Uncertainty Analyzer (MUA) |
|
|
161 | |
|
6.4 Establish A- and B-Basis Allowables |
|
|
163 | |
|
6.4.1 Combining Limited Test Data with Progressive Failure and Probabilistic Analysis |
|
|
164 | |
|
6.4.2 Examples of Allowable Generation for Unnotched and Notched Composite Specimens |
|
|
166 | |
|
6.5 Certification by Analysis Example |
|
|
171 | |
|
|
182 | |
|
|
183 | |
|
7 Modeling of Multiscale Fatigue Crack Growth: Nano/Micro and Micro/Macro Transitions |
|
|
187 | |
|
|
|
|
188 | |
|
7.2 Scale Implications Associated with Size Effects |
|
|
190 | |
|
7.2.1 Physical Laws Change with Size and Time |
|
|
190 | |
|
7.2.2 Surface-to-Volume Ratio as a Controlling Parameter |
|
|
191 | |
|
7.2.3 Strength and Toughness: Nano, Micro and Macro |
|
|
192 | |
|
7.3 Form Invariant of Two-Parameter Crack Growth Relation |
|
|
193 | |
|
7.4 Dual-Scale Fatigue Crack Growth Rate Models |
|
|
194 | |
|
7.4.1 Micro/Macro Formulation |
|
|
196 | |
|
7.4.2 Nano/Micro Formulation |
|
|
197 | |
|
7.5 Micro/Macro Time-Dependent Physical Parameters |
|
|
198 | |
|
7.5.1 Macroscopic Material Properties |
|
|
198 | |
|
7.5.2 Microscopic Material Properties |
|
|
201 | |
|
7.6 Nano/Micro Time-Dependent Physical Parameters |
|
|
204 | |
|
7.6.1 Nanoscopic Material Properties |
|
|
205 | |
|
7.6.2 Nanoscopic Fatigue Crack Growth Coefficient |
|
|
207 | |
|
7.7 Fatigue Crack Growth and Velocity Data |
|
|
208 | |
|
7.7.1 Predicted Micro/Macro Results |
|
|
209 | |
|
7.7.2 Predicted Nano/Micro Results |
|
|
210 | |
|
7.8 Validation of Nano/Micro/Macro Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior |
|
|
212 | |
|
7.9 Implication of Multiscaling and Future Considerations |
|
|
214 | |
|
|
217 | |
|
8 Multiscale Modeling of Nanocomposite Materials |
|
|
221 | |
|
|
|
|
221 | |
|
8.2 Computational Modeling Tools |
|
|
223 | |
|
8.3 Equivalent-Continuum Models |
|
|
224 | |
|
8.3.1 Representative Volume Element |
|
|
224 | |
|
8.3.2 Equivalent Continuum |
|
|
227 | |
|
8.3.3 Equivalence of Averaged Scalar Fields |
|
|
231 | |
|
8.3.4 Kinematic Equivalence |
|
|
232 | |
|
8.4 Equivalent-Continuum Modeling Strategies |
|
|
233 | |
|
8.4.1 Crystalline and Highly Ordered Material Systems |
|
|
233 | |
|
8.4.2 Fluctuation Methods |
|
|
234 | |
|
8.4.3 Static Deformation Methods |
|
|
235 | |
|
8.4.4 Dynamic Deformation Methods |
|
|
236 | |
|
|
236 | |
|
8.5.1 Silica Nanoparticle/Polymer Composites |
|
|
236 | |
|
8.5.2 Nanotube/Polymer Composites |
|
|
238 | |
|
|
242 | |
|
|
243 | |
|
|
247 | |
|
|
|
|
248 | |
|
|
251 | |
|
9.2.1 Nanotechnology and Modeling |
|
|
253 | |
|
|
255 | |
|
9.2.3 The Interface Region |
|
|
258 | |
|
9.2.4 Functionalization of Interface Region |
|
|
259 | |
|
9.2.5 Modeling Approaches |
|
|
262 | |
|
9.2.6 Method Developments |
|
|
265 | |
|
|
266 | |
|
|
267 | |
|
9.4.1 Predicting Material Properties from the Top-Down Approach |
|
|
267 | |
|
9.4.2 Analytical Continuum Modeling |
|
|
268 | |
|
9.4.3 Computational Continuum Modeling |
|
|
268 | |
|
9.5 Materials Engineering Simulation Across Multi-Length and Time Scales |
|
|
269 | |
|
9.5.1 Predicting Material Properties from the Bottom-Up Approach |
|
|
269 | |
|
|
271 | |
|
|
272 | |
|
|
274 | |
|
9.6 Extension of Atomistic Ensemble Methods |
|
|
275 | |
|
9.6.1 Combining the Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches |
|
|
275 | |
|
|
278 | |
|
|
279 | |
|
|
281 | |
10 Multiscale Approach to Predicting the Mechanical Behavior of Polymeric Melts |
|
291 | |
|
|
|
|
291 | |
|
10.2 Single and Multiscale Modeling Methods: Limitations and Tradeoffs |
|
|
293 | |
|
10.2.1 Atomistic and Atomistic-Like Models |
|
|
293 | |
|
|
296 | |
|
|
297 | |
|
10.3 Two Information-Passing Examples |
|
|
298 | |
|
|
298 | |
|
10.3.2 Calibration of Rheological Constitutive Models |
|
|
299 | |
|
10.3.3 Developing Coarse-Grained Models of Polymeric Melts |
|
|
306 | |
|
|
317 | |
11 Prediction of Damage Propagation and Failure of Composite Structures (Without Testing) |
|
321 | |
|
|
|
|
321 | |
|
11.2 Basics of Progressive Damage Modelling methodology |
|
|
323 | |
|
|
323 | |
|
11.2.2 Multiscale Computational Model |
|
|
324 | |
|
11.2.3 Prediction of Local Failure at Different Scale Levels |
|
|
329 | |
|
11.2.4 Behaviour of Damaged Material |
|
|
331 | |
|
11.3 Buckling and Damage Interaction of Open-Hole Composite Plates by PDM |
|
|
334 | |
|
11.3.1 Composite Panel with Circular Cut-Out |
|
|
334 | |
|
11.3.2 Computational Model for the Open-Hole Panel Problem |
|
|
335 | |
|
11.3.3 Interaction Effects Between Damage Failure and Plate Buckling |
|
|
337 | |
|
11.4 Implementation of PDM in Composite Bolted Joints |
|
|
339 | |
|
11.4.1 Description of Composite Bolted Joint Problem |
|
|
339 | |
|
11.4.2 Damage Initiation and Progression Within the Bolted Joint |
|
|
342 | |
|
11.5 Implementation of PDM in Composite Bonded Repairs |
|
|
345 | |
|
11.5.1 Description of the Composite Repair Patch Problem |
|
|
345 | |
|
11.5.2 Details of PDM Model for Composite Repair Patch Analysis |
|
|
346 | |
|
11.5.3 Effects of Composite Patch Geometry and Material on the SIF |
|
|
348 | |
|
11.6 Multi-Scale Modeling of Tensile Behavior of Carbon Nanotube-Reinforced Composites |
|
|
350 | |
|
|
352 | |
|
|
353 | |
12 Functional Nanostructured Polymer–Metal Interfaces |
|
357 | |
|
Niranjan A. Malvadkar, Michael A. Ulizio, Jill Lowman, and Melik C. Demirel |
|
|
|
|
357 | |
|
12.2 Oblique-Angle Polymerization |
|
|
358 | |
|
12.2.1 Nanostructured Polymer growth |
|
|
358 | |
|
12.2.2 Control of Morphology and Topography |
|
|
360 | |
|
12.3 Metallization of Nanostructured Polymers |
|
|
361 | |
|
12.3.1 Electroless Metal Deposition |
|
|
362 | |
|
12.3.2 Vapor Phase Metal Deposition |
|
|
363 | |
|
12.3.3 Nanoparticle Assembly |
|
|
364 | |
|
|
366 | |
|
|
368 | |
13 Advanced Experimental Techniques for Multiscale Modeling of Materials |
|
371 | |
|
Reza S. Yassar and Hessam M.S. Ghassemi |
|
|
|
13.1 Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) |
|
|
372 | |
|
|
372 | |
|
|
374 | |
|
13.1.3 Application of AFM |
|
|
375 | |
|
13.1.4 Modeling and Simulation |
|
|
379 | |
|
13.2 X-Ray Ultra-Microscopy |
|
|
382 | |
|
|
382 | |
|
13.2.2 Phase Contrast and Absorption Contrast |
|
|
384 | |
|
13.2.3 3D Imaging and Multiscale Modeling Applications |
|
|
385 | |
|
13.3 In Situ Micro-Electro-Mechanical-Systems (MEMS) Introduction |
|
|
388 | |
|
13.3.1 Principle and Design of MEMS Devices |
|
|
389 | |
|
13.3.2 Application of MEMS Devices for Materials Modeling |
|
|
392 | |
|
|
395 | |
|
|
396 | |
Index |
|
399 | |