Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Water Governance Decentralization in Sub-Saharan Africa: Between Myth and Reality

  • Formaat - PDF+DRM
  • Hind: 55,56 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • See e-raamat on mõeldud ainult isiklikuks kasutamiseks. E-raamatuid ei saa tagastada.

DRM piirangud

  • Kopeerimine (copy/paste):

    ei ole lubatud

  • Printimine:

    ei ole lubatud

  • Kasutamine:

    Digitaalõiguste kaitse (DRM)
    Kirjastus on väljastanud selle e-raamatu krüpteeritud kujul, mis tähendab, et selle lugemiseks peate installeerima spetsiaalse tarkvara. Samuti peate looma endale  Adobe ID Rohkem infot siin. E-raamatut saab lugeda 1 kasutaja ning alla laadida kuni 6'de seadmesse (kõik autoriseeritud sama Adobe ID-ga).

    Vajalik tarkvara
    Mobiilsetes seadmetes (telefon või tahvelarvuti) lugemiseks peate installeerima selle tasuta rakenduse: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    PC või Mac seadmes lugemiseks peate installima Adobe Digital Editionsi (Seeon tasuta rakendus spetsiaalselt e-raamatute lugemiseks. Seda ei tohi segamini ajada Adober Reader'iga, mis tõenäoliselt on juba teie arvutisse installeeritud )

    Seda e-raamatut ei saa lugeda Amazon Kindle's. 

This book is about the process of water management decentralization in African countries, which is seen as a means of advancing river basin management at the lowest appropriate level.There are very different stages of implementing decentralization in practice. This called for research aiming to understand the following questions: (i) why do some water agencies succeed more than others? (ii) What are the variables involved in such reform process? (iii) which variables have a positive or a negative impact on the implementation of decentralization processes? (iv) Which variables could be affected by policy interventions, and how? This study aimed to answer these questions through the following objectives: (i) analyze the factors that have potentially affected the results of decentralization process in SSA basins, and (ii) analyze the performance of decentralization process in SSA basins. Qualitative and quantitative approaches were used.The main findings are that water scarcity is

a major stimulus to reform; water user associations, if not well prepared and trained, may deter the decentralization process; and being part of an existing treaty over an international basin helps foster the process. Conditions improving decentralization performance include: scarcity of water resources, longer period of implementation, bottom-up creation, and appropriate budgetary support. 

Introduction, motivation and approach.- Water decentralization experiences: A literature review.- Analytical framework.- Case studies in Mozambique, South Africa, and Zimbabwe.- Quantitative analysis: Empirical models and data collection process.- Results of quantitative analysis.- Conclusions and policy implications.- References.
1 Introduction, Motivation and Approach
1(6)
1.1 Motivation of the Study
1(3)
1.2 Study Approach
4(1)
1.3 Scope of the Study
5(2)
References
5(2)
2 Water Decentralization Experiences: A Literature Review
7(10)
2.1 Background
7(1)
2.2 IWRM, Decentralization, and African Water Policies
8(2)
2.3 Success and Failure Stories from Africa, with Focus on SADC Countries
10(4)
2.4 Some Reflections Emerging from the Literature Review
14(3)
References
15(2)
3 Analytical Framework
17(10)
3.1 Theoretical Considerations
17(1)
3.2 Hypotheses: Analysis of Variables
18(7)
3.2.1 Contextual Factors and Initial Conditions
19(1)
3.2.2 Characteristics of the Decentralization Process
20(1)
3.2.3 Characteristics of Central Government/Basin-Level Relationships and Capacities
21(2)
3.2.4 The Internal Configuration of Basin-Level Institutional Arrangements
23(2)
3.3 The Models
25(2)
References
25(2)
4 Case Studies in Mozambique, South Africa, and Zimbabwe
27(8)
4.1 Data Collection and Analysis
27(2)
4.2 Historical Context of the Three Studied Countries
29(1)
4.3 Water Laws and Policies
30(1)
4.4 Comparative Analysis of the Basin Case Studies
31(2)
4.5 Limitations of the Case Studies
33(2)
References
34(1)
5 Quantitative Analysis: Empirical Models and Data Collection Process
35(8)
5.1 The Empirical Models
35(3)
5.2 Data Collection Process
38(5)
5.2.1 The Potential Final Set of Basins Included in the Study
38(1)
5.2.2 The Administration of the Questionnaires
39(1)
5.2.3 Quality Assurance Procedures
39(1)
5.2.4 Variable Construction
40(1)
References
40(3)
6 Results of Quantitative Analysis
43(6)
6.1 Descriptive Statistics
43(1)
6.2 Inference of Our Hypotheses
44(5)
6.2.1 Performance of Decentralization (Before and After)
44(1)
6.2.2 Determinants of the Decentralization Process
45(1)
6.2.3 The Decentralization Performance
46(1)
References
47(2)
7 Conclusions and Policy Implications
49(6)
7.1 Decentralization Process
50(2)
7.1.1 Contextual Factors and Initial Conditions
50(1)
7.1.2 Characteristics of the Decentralization Process
51(1)
7.1.3 Central Government/Basin-Level Relationships and Capacities
51(1)
7.1.4 The Internal Configuration of Basin-Level Institutional Arrangements
52(1)
7.2 Decentralization Performance
52(1)
7.3 Policy Implications
52(3)
References
54(1)
Annex A Application of the Analytical Framework to the Three Southern African Case Studies 55(14)
Annex B Major River Basins and River Basin Organizations in Sub-Saharan Africa 69(12)
Annex C Original Variables in the Dataset and Construction of Additional Variables 81(12)
Annex D Revised River Basin Organization (RBO) Questionnaire 93(18)
Annex E Result Tables 111(12)
Annex F Figures 123