|
1 Introduction, Motivation and Approach |
|
|
1 | (6) |
|
1.1 Motivation of the Study |
|
|
1 | (3) |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
2 Water Decentralization Experiences: A Literature Review |
|
|
7 | (10) |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
2.2 IWRM, Decentralization, and African Water Policies |
|
|
8 | (2) |
|
2.3 Success and Failure Stories from Africa, with Focus on SADC Countries |
|
|
10 | (4) |
|
2.4 Some Reflections Emerging from the Literature Review |
|
|
14 | (3) |
|
|
15 | (2) |
|
|
17 | (10) |
|
3.1 Theoretical Considerations |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
3.2 Hypotheses: Analysis of Variables |
|
|
18 | (7) |
|
3.2.1 Contextual Factors and Initial Conditions |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
3.2.2 Characteristics of the Decentralization Process |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
3.2.3 Characteristics of Central Government/Basin-Level Relationships and Capacities |
|
|
21 | (2) |
|
3.2.4 The Internal Configuration of Basin-Level Institutional Arrangements |
|
|
23 | (2) |
|
|
25 | (2) |
|
|
25 | (2) |
|
4 Case Studies in Mozambique, South Africa, and Zimbabwe |
|
|
27 | (8) |
|
4.1 Data Collection and Analysis |
|
|
27 | (2) |
|
4.2 Historical Context of the Three Studied Countries |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
4.3 Water Laws and Policies |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
4.4 Comparative Analysis of the Basin Case Studies |
|
|
31 | (2) |
|
4.5 Limitations of the Case Studies |
|
|
33 | (2) |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
5 Quantitative Analysis: Empirical Models and Data Collection Process |
|
|
35 | (8) |
|
|
35 | (3) |
|
5.2 Data Collection Process |
|
|
38 | (5) |
|
5.2.1 The Potential Final Set of Basins Included in the Study |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
5.2.2 The Administration of the Questionnaires |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
5.2.3 Quality Assurance Procedures |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
5.2.4 Variable Construction |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
|
40 | (3) |
|
6 Results of Quantitative Analysis |
|
|
43 | (6) |
|
6.1 Descriptive Statistics |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
6.2 Inference of Our Hypotheses |
|
|
44 | (5) |
|
6.2.1 Performance of Decentralization (Before and After) |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
6.2.2 Determinants of the Decentralization Process |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
6.2.3 The Decentralization Performance |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
|
47 | (2) |
|
7 Conclusions and Policy Implications |
|
|
49 | (6) |
|
7.1 Decentralization Process |
|
|
50 | (2) |
|
7.1.1 Contextual Factors and Initial Conditions |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
7.1.2 Characteristics of the Decentralization Process |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
7.1.3 Central Government/Basin-Level Relationships and Capacities |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
7.1.4 The Internal Configuration of Basin-Level Institutional Arrangements |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
7.2 Decentralization Performance |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
|
52 | (3) |
|
|
54 | (1) |
Annex A Application of the Analytical Framework to the Three Southern African Case Studies |
|
55 | (14) |
Annex B Major River Basins and River Basin Organizations in Sub-Saharan Africa |
|
69 | (12) |
Annex C Original Variables in the Dataset and Construction of Additional Variables |
|
81 | (12) |
Annex D Revised River Basin Organization (RBO) Questionnaire |
|
93 | (18) |
Annex E Result Tables |
|
111 | (12) |
Annex F Figures |
|
123 | |