"In the era of evidence-based medicine (EBM), discussions of medical knowledge have been largely focused on the role of clinical trial research, though even the primary architects of EBM have always acknowledged that the results of such clinical researchdo not, and should not, dictate care. Although the most widely cited definitions of EBM states that knowledge from clinical trials must be integrated with a physician's clinical expertise, knowledge of physiology, and understanding of their patient's values, proponents of EBM have provided sparse guidance on how this integration should occur. Solving this "integration problem" of EBM requires understanding how clinicians gain and demonstrate expertise, what kinds of medical knowledge can legitimately be brought to bear, and how knowledge of individual patients should be obtained and considered in clinical decision making. This book describes and defends a case-based approach to clinical judgment reliant on a broad and non-hierarchical view of medical epistemology"-- Provided by publisher.
On What Evidence? presents a case-based approach to clinical decision-making that integrates many kinds of medical knowledge in providing care for an individual patient. Since the rise in popularity of evidence-based medicine (EBM), most discussions of medical decision-making have focused almost entirely on knowledge derived from clinical research. Robyn Bluhm and Mark Tonelli evaluate other sources of knowledge--laboratory research on physiological mechanisms, a physician's own clinical experience, and a patient's experiences and values--to demonstrate that these are equally important in making decisions about care.
In the era of evidence-based medicine (EBM), discussions of medical knowledge have largely focused on the role of clinical research, though even the primary architects of EBM have acknowledged that the results of such research should not alone dictate decisions about care for individual patients. The most widely cited definition of EBM states that knowledge from clinical trials must be integrated with a physician's clinical expertise, knowledge of physiology, and understanding of their patient's values. Yet proponents of EBM have provided sparse guidance on how this integration should occur.
On What Evidence? aims to solve this "integration problem" by considering how clinicians gain and demonstrate expertise, what kinds of medical knowledge can legitimately be brought to bear, and how knowledge of individual patients should be obtained and evaluated in clinical decision-making. The authors analyze the types of knowledge necessary to provide effective care and examine the medical and philosophical literature on each. Fusing real-life practice and theoretical rigor, On What Evidence? describes and defends a case-based approach to clinical decision-making, one based on a broad and non-hierarchical view of medical epistemology.
Lisainfo e-raamatute kohta