From Chernobyl to Fukushima, have we come full circle, where formalisation has replaced ambiguity and a decadent style of management, to the point where it is becoming counter-productive? Safety culture is a contested concept and a complex phenomenon, which has been much debated in recent years. In some high-risk activities, like the operating of nuclear power plants, transparency, traceability and standardisation have become synonymous with issues of quality. Meanwhile, the experience-based knowledge that forms the basis of manuals and instructions is liable to decline. In the long-term, arguably, it is the cultural changes and its adverse impacts on co-operation, skill and ability of judgement that will pose the greater risks to the safety of nuclear plants and other high-risk facilities. Johan Berglund examines the background leading up to the Fukushima Daiichi accident in 2011 and highlights the function of practical proficiency in the quality and safety of high-risk activities. The accumulation of skill represents a more indirect and long-term approach to quality, oriented not towards short-term gains but (towards) delayed gratification. Risk management and quality professionals and academics will be interested in the links between skill, quality and safety-critical work as well as those interested in a unique insight into Japanese culture and working life as well as fresh perspectives on safety culture.
Arvustused
'Berglunds book is structured as a series of essays, with thorough references, linking to wider international literature. With the overall theme of Skill and Formalisation, which was developed in his PhD thesis on "The New Taylorism", he takes up issues which link nuclear power generation with wide current debates.'
Richard Ennals, AI & Society
| Preface |
|
vii | |
| Acknowledgements |
|
viii | |
|
1 Introduction: Skill and Formalisation |
|
|
1 | (5) |
|
2 The Separation of Knowing and Doing |
|
|
6 | (15) |
|
|
|
6 | (7) |
|
2.2 Managing the Unexpected |
|
|
13 | (8) |
|
3 The Shadows of Progress |
|
|
21 | (9) |
|
|
|
21 | (4) |
|
3.2 Technological Culture |
|
|
25 | (5) |
|
4 The Projection of Quality |
|
|
30 | (16) |
|
4.1 Complexity and Rational Design |
|
|
30 | (4) |
|
4.2 The Measurement of Performance |
|
|
34 | (12) |
|
|
|
46 | (19) |
|
5.1 Dynamic Safety Cultures |
|
|
46 | (11) |
|
5.2 The Learning That Goes Into Skill |
|
|
57 | (8) |
|
6 The Concept of Quality Revisited |
|
|
65 | (20) |
|
6.1 Indirect Approaches to Quality |
|
|
65 | (8) |
|
6.2 Seeing Different Worlds |
|
|
73 | (12) |
|
|
|
85 | (5) |
| References |
|
90 | (5) |
| Index |
|
95 | |
Dr Johan Berglund of Linnaeus University holds a PhD in Industrial Economics and Management from KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm. His thesis The New Taylorism addressed the safety culture of the Nuclear Power Industry, as well as cultural changes and imperatives of working life in general. As Visiting Scholar at Meiji University, Tokyo, he had the occasion to develop these perspectives further, exploring the background of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident of 2011. Prior to completing his dissertation Johan published a number of reports on the Nuclear Power Industry in Sweden, a collaboration between KTH and the Swedish Nuclear Safety and Training Centre (KSU).
Lisainfo e-raamatute kohta