Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Working with and against Shared Curricula: Perspectives from College Writing Teachers and Administrators

Edited by , Edited by , Series edited by
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Formaat - EPUB+DRM
  • Hind: 72,65 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • See e-raamat on mõeldud ainult isiklikuks kasutamiseks. E-raamatuid ei saa tagastada.
Teised raamatud teemal:

DRM piirangud

  • Kopeerimine (copy/paste):

    ei ole lubatud

  • Printimine:

    ei ole lubatud

  • Kasutamine:

    Digitaalõiguste kaitse (DRM)
    Kirjastus on väljastanud selle e-raamatu krüpteeritud kujul, mis tähendab, et selle lugemiseks peate installeerima spetsiaalse tarkvara. Samuti peate looma endale  Adobe ID Rohkem infot siin. E-raamatut saab lugeda 1 kasutaja ning alla laadida kuni 6'de seadmesse (kõik autoriseeritud sama Adobe ID-ga).

    Vajalik tarkvara
    Mobiilsetes seadmetes (telefon või tahvelarvuti) lugemiseks peate installeerima selle tasuta rakenduse: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    PC või Mac seadmes lugemiseks peate installima Adobe Digital Editionsi (Seeon tasuta rakendus spetsiaalselt e-raamatute lugemiseks. Seda ei tohi segamini ajada Adober Reader'iga, mis tõenäoliselt on juba teie arvutisse installeeritud )

    Seda e-raamatut ei saa lugeda Amazon Kindle's. 

"Working with and against Shared Curricula: Perspectives from College Writing Teachers and Administrators explores the complexities surrounding the expanding use of shared curricula-syllabi and assignments intended to work universally, for all teachers and all students within a given writing program. Chapters in this collection offer the experiential accounts and research-based arguments needed to prepare teachers and administrators to respond to calls to scale up writing programs for delivery by contingent instructors, in online courses, or at distant sites. Speaking from a variety of perspectives and institutional locations, these authors grapple with questions increasingly common in writing programs: In what ways do shared curricula forward noble goals, such as reducing workload for teachers or ensuring an equitable educational experience for all ; In what ways do shared curricula undermine teacher efficacy and student learning ; When syllabi and assignments are exported from one location to another, what contexts are gained, lost, or changed in the process? In the end, what emerges from this collection is not a clear or simplified argument either for or against shared curricula and pre-designed courses. Instead, readers gain a nuanced picture of boththe affordances and limitations of these instructional modelsfor writing programs, and their potential impacts for teachers and students. By exploring the lived experiences, material conditions, political economies, and ideological conflicts of shared curricula environments for multiple stakeholders, this collection serves as a thoughtful interrogation of scalability in writing instruction"--

Working with and against Shared Curricula: Perspectives from College Writing Teachers and Administrators explores the complexities surrounding the expanding use of shared curricula



Working with and against Shared Curricula: Perspectives from College Writing Teachers and Administrators explores the complexities surrounding the expanding use of shared curricula—syllabi and assignments intended to work universally, for all teachers and all students within a given writing program. Chapters in this collection offer the experiential accounts and research-based arguments needed to prepare teachers and administrators to respond to calls to scale up writing programs for delivery by contingent instructors, in online courses, or at distant sites. Speaking from a variety of perspectives and institutional locations, these authors grapple with questions increasingly common in writing programs: In what ways do shared curricula forward noble goals, such as reducing workload for teachers or ensuring an equitable educational experience for all ; In what ways do shared curricula undermine teacher efficacy and student learning ; When syllabi and assignments are exported from one location to another, what contexts are gained, lost, or changed in the process? In the end, what emerges from this collection is not a clear or simplified argument either for or against shared curricula and pre-designed courses. Instead, readers gain a nuanced picture of both the affordances and limitations of these instructional models for writing programs, and their potential impacts for teachers and students. By exploring the lived experiences, material conditions, political economies, and ideological conflicts of shared curricula environments for multiple stakeholders, this collection serves as a thoughtful interrogation of scalability in writing instruction.

Arvustused

The exigency and urgency of Working with and against Shared Curricula is clear as writing teachers and WPAs continue to negotiate neoliberal structures of modern higher education and increasing demand for online and dual-credit education programs. Connie Kendall Theado, Samantha NeCamp, and their contributors present a complex picture of the affordances, limitations, and challenges posed by shared curricula as a conceptual model and practice, including the risks to instructors, students, and their experiences as writers. Morris Young, The University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA Working with and against Shared Curricula is a thoughtful, timely collection exploring the long-neglected issue of standardized syllabi and course designs. The voices in this book illustrate the inventive, ethical, and sometimes conflicted responses by teachers and writing program administrators to the rise of such pedagogical approaches. As institutions increasingly adopt neoliberal systems and ideologies that emphasize standardization and efficiency over creativity and autonomy, teachers and writing program administrators will find, in this book, important conversations about adaptation and resistance. Bronwyn T. Williams, University of Louisville, USA

List of Contributors
ix
Acknowledgments xiii
Working with and against Shared Curricula: An Introduction 1(12)
Samantha NeCamp
Connie Kendall Theado
Chapter One Online Teaching, Linguistic Diversity, and a Standard of Care: Developing a Shared Curriculum at a Hispanic-Serving Institution
13(16)
Jacqueline Amorim
Christine Martorana
Chapter Two Administrative Policies and Pre-Designed Courses (PDCs): Negotiating Instructor and Student Agency
29(16)
Catrina Mitchum
Rochelle Rodrigo
Chapter Three Impossibilities of Scalability: Autonomy, Adjunification, and Apprenticeship in the Age of the Austerity Crisis
45(16)
Megan Pindling
Emily Price
Amy J. Wan
Chapter Four Rigorous Adaptability in the Concurrent Enrollment Writing Classroom
61(14)
Jonna Gilfus
Sean M. Conrey
Melanie Nappa-Carroll
Chapter Five From Skeptic to Believer to Advocate: How I Came to Understand the Benefits of Shared Curricula Writing Programs
75(16)
Hannah Thompson
Chapter Six Humanizing Competency-Based Education in the Writing Classroom
91(18)
Heather Johnson-Taylor
Chapter Seven ePortfolios: A Constructive Loophole in the Shared Curricula Model
109(16)
Laurie B. Bauer
Ruth Benander
Brenda Refaei
Afterword: Toward Dynamic, Inclusive, and Equitable Shared Curricula 125(8)
Lisa R. Arnold
Index 133
Connie Kendall Theado is Associate Professor in the School of Education at the University of Cincinnati. She received her Ph.D. in English from Miami University (Ohio). Her scholarship appears in JAC, Language and Literacy, Classroom Discourse, Open Words, and several edited collections.



Samantha NeCamp is Assistant Professor of English at the University of Cincinnati. She is the author of two monographs: Adult Literacy and American Identity and Literacy in the Mountains. She received her Ph.D. in Rhetoric and Composition from the University of Louisville.