|
|
|
xv | |
| Abbreviations |
|
xxiii | |
| Acknowledgments |
|
xxvii | |
| Foreword |
|
xxix | |
| General introduction |
|
1 | (4) |
|
PART I Humanization of arms control treaties dealing with non-nuclear weapons |
|
|
5 | (108) |
|
|
|
7 | (10) |
|
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
B Recent developments in the international legal order favoring the conclusion of the treaties examined in the first Part |
|
|
8 | (9) |
|
1 Permeability of the borders between the law applicable in peacetime and in armed conflict |
|
|
8 | (4) |
|
2 A new approach to international security: "Human security" as a linkage between security and human rights |
|
|
12 | (3) |
|
3 A new approach to development: "Human development" |
|
|
15 | (2) |
|
2 The preparatory history of the relevant treaties, and in particular the role played by civil society |
|
|
17 | (18) |
|
|
|
17 | (3) |
|
B Genesis of the Ottawa and Oslo Conventions |
|
|
20 | (7) |
|
|
|
20 | (4) |
|
|
|
24 | (3) |
|
|
|
27 | (5) |
|
D Conclusions to the Chapter |
|
|
32 | (3) |
|
3 The contribution of the relevant treaties to the protection of the human being |
|
|
35 | (40) |
|
A Prohibition of "using" the relevant weapons imposed by the CWC, and the Ottawa and Oslo Conventions |
|
|
35 | (25) |
|
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
2 Prohibition of "using" the relevant weapons in the light of humanitarian law |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
a) General clause prohibiting use of the relevant weapons (Article I of the Conventions) |
|
|
35 | (2) |
|
b) Relevance of the Geneva Protocol and the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) in the CWC |
|
|
37 | (4) |
|
c) Relevance of the principles of humanitarian law in the Ottawa and Oslo Conventions |
|
|
41 | (8) |
|
3 Prohibition of using the relevant weapons in light of human rights law |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
a) Prohibition of using these weapons "never under any circumstances" in the CWC and the Ottawa and Oslo Conventions |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
b) The human rights aspects of the Ottawa and Oslo Conventions |
|
|
50 | (10) |
|
B The other legal duties (arms control, non-proliferation, and disarmament obligations) under the CWC and the Ottawa and Oslo Conventions |
|
|
60 | (2) |
|
|
|
62 | (13) |
|
1 Raison d'etre of the ATT |
|
|
62 | (3) |
|
2 Contribution to the protection of the human being through absolute prohibitions of transfers of arms that might be used to commit certain international crimes (Article 6 ATT) |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
3 Contribution to the protection of the human being through export assessments (Article 7 ATT) |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
a) Relevance of the ATT for the respect of international humanitarian law |
|
|
66 | (2) |
|
b) Relevance of the ATT for the respect of human rights law |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
c) Need for a gender- and age-sensitive assessment of human rights violations (Article 7 § 4 ATT) |
|
|
69 | (3) |
|
|
|
72 | (3) |
|
4 Implementation and verification of the relevant treaties by human rights actors and institutions |
|
|
75 | (38) |
|
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
|
|
76 | (16) |
|
1 Implementation of the CWC: Civil society assisting the OPCW |
|
|
76 | (5) |
|
2 The Ottawa and Oslo Conventions: Decisive role played by civil society |
|
|
81 | (5) |
|
|
|
86 | (5) |
|
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
C Role of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe |
|
|
92 | (11) |
|
1 The ECtHR and the execution of its final judgments under the supervision of the Committee of Ministers |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
2 Cases involving anti-personnel mines |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
a) Pasa and Erkan Erol v. Turkey |
|
|
93 | (4) |
|
b) Albekov and Others v. Russia |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
3 Cases involving chemicals |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
a) Finogenov v. Russia: Legality of "incapacitating chemical agents" |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
b) Cases involving riot control agents, in particular directed against Turkey |
|
|
99 | (2) |
|
4 Case involving cluster munitions: Behrami and Behrami v. France |
|
|
101 | (2) |
|
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
D International Criminal Court (ICC) |
|
|
103 | (10) |
|
|
|
103 | (2) |
|
2 Prosecution for crimes committed by the use of chemical weapons, with particular attention to the potential role of the ICC in the war in Syria |
|
|
105 | (2) |
|
3 Potential prosecutions for crimes committed by use of anti-personnel or cluster munitions |
|
|
107 | (2) |
|
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
|
|
110 | (3) |
|
PART II Humanization of arms control treaties dealing with nuclear weapons |
|
|
113 | (166) |
|
|
|
115 | (6) |
|
A Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
B Treaties banning nuclear testing |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
C Treaties on the denuclearization of certain regions (nuclear-weapon-free zones, NWFZ) |
|
|
117 | (4) |
|
6 The preparatory history of the relevant treaties, and in particular the role played by civil society |
|
|
121 | (20) |
|
A Origins of the antinuclear movement |
|
|
121 | (3) |
|
B Treaties banning nuclear weapons tests |
|
|
124 | (9) |
|
1 Lobbying in favor of the PTBT (1963) |
|
|
124 | (2) |
|
2 The long way toward the CTBT |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
b) Greenpeace (direct, non-violent activism) |
|
|
127 | (2) |
|
c) The "Nevada-Semipalatinsk" movement (grassroots movement) |
|
|
129 | (3) |
|
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
C Treaties on the denuclearization of certain regions (NWFZ) |
|
|
133 | (5) |
|
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
2 The example of the Rarotonga Treaty |
|
|
134 | (4) |
|
|
|
138 | (3) |
|
7 Assessing the legality of nuclear weapons in light of humanitarian and human rights law |
|
|
141 | (113) |
|
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
B The prohibition of using nuclear weapons in the light of humanitarian law |
|
|
142 | (31) |
|
1 The ICJ's Advisory Opinion (1996) and the special features of nuclear weapons |
|
|
142 | (2) |
|
2 The need to challenge the ICJ's conclusions in light of the humanitarian approach to nuclear weapons |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
a) Early expressions of a humanitarian approach to nuclear weapons |
|
|
144 | (4) |
|
b) Recent developments, in particular the "humanitarian pledge," the ICRC's firm position on nuclear weapons, and the Marshall Islands cases before the ICJ |
|
|
148 | (9) |
|
c) New evidence for the destructive power of nuclear weapons and for the inability to assist the victims of nuclear explosions |
|
|
157 | (4) |
|
d) The particular question of the legality of low-yield and earth penetrating nuclear weapons |
|
|
161 | (5) |
|
3 A legal update: Toward a presumption of unlawfulness of nuclear weapons under international humanitarian law |
|
|
166 | (7) |
|
C The prohibition of using nuclear weapons in light of human rights law |
|
|
173 | (69) |
|
1 Preliminary observations |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
a) The added value of international human rights law for the use of nuclear weapons |
|
|
173 | (4) |
|
b) Applicability of human rights law during armed conflict |
|
|
177 | (3) |
|
c) Extraterritorial application of human rights treaties in the context of the use of nuclear weapons |
|
|
180 | (4) |
|
2 The most important civil and political rights likely to be affected by nuclear attacks |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
|
|
184 | (6) |
|
b) Prohibition of genocide |
|
|
190 | (1) |
|
c) The prohibition of torture, and degrading and inhuman treatment |
|
|
191 | (5) |
|
d) Right to respect for private life and home, and right to property |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
e) Non-exhaustive list of potential human rights violations: Use of nuclear weapons as a total denial of all basic human rights |
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
3 Duty to respect human rights after a nuclear explosion |
|
|
198 | (1) |
|
a) Positive obligation of States to protect life and dignity after a nuclear accident or catastrophe |
|
|
198 | (4) |
|
b) Right to health in the aftermath of the Fukushima accident (2011) |
|
|
202 | (2) |
|
4 The scenario of a limited (regional) nuclear war and its impact on the global enjoyment of economic, social, and cultural rights |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
a) Impact of a regional nuclear war on global development, health, and environment |
|
|
204 | (3) |
|
b) Introductory remarks on economic, social, and cultural rights |
|
|
207 | (2) |
|
c) The right to development and the right not to be discriminated against |
|
|
209 | (3) |
|
d) The rights to the highest standard of health and to a healthy environment |
|
|
212 | (4) |
|
e) The right to an adequate standard of living, in particular the rights to food and to water |
|
|
216 | (6) |
|
5 Human rights of particularly vulnerable groups, assessed in light of the harm caused by nuclear testing and nuclear power plant accidents |
|
|
222 | (1) |
|
|
|
222 | (1) |
|
b) Indigenous peoples' rights, assessed in particular in light of their special relationship with their land |
|
|
223 | (6) |
|
c) Women's rights, in particular their reproductive rights |
|
|
229 | (4) |
|
|
|
233 | (5) |
|
6 Conclusions of the present chapter, in particular in light of the rights of future generations |
|
|
238 | (4) |
|
D The other legal duties (arms control, non-proliferation, and disarmament obligations) assessed in light of humanitarian and human rights law |
|
|
242 | (12) |
|
|
|
242 | (1) |
|
2 The limitations to the development, manufacture, production, acquisition, possession, and threat of use of nuclear weapons imposed by humanitarian law |
|
|
242 | (2) |
|
3 The limitations imposed by human rights law |
|
|
244 | (1) |
|
a) Development, manufacture, production, acquisition, and possession in light of the right to development |
|
|
244 | (2) |
|
b) Possession and threat of nuclear weapons as potential human rights violations |
|
|
246 | (2) |
|
c) Positive obligation of States to prevent accidental nuclear explosions and those caused by terrorists |
|
|
248 | (3) |
|
d) The right to receive information about the risks inherent in the possession of nuclear weapons |
|
|
251 | (3) |
|
8 Implementation and verification of the relevant treaties by human rights actors and institutions |
|
|
254 | (25) |
|
|
|
254 | (1) |
|
B Civil society: The example of the NPT |
|
|
254 | (14) |
|
|
|
254 | (2) |
|
2 The contribution of civil society in implementing Article VI NPT |
|
|
256 | (1) |
|
a) The growing importance of Article VI NPT |
|
|
256 | (1) |
|
b) The structure of the civil society involved in the NPT review process and the OFWG, including the survivors and victims of Hiroshima and Nagasaki ("Hibakusha") |
|
|
257 | (2) |
|
c) From the limited but growing role of the civil society in the NPT review process to the democratic, participatory OEWG |
|
|
259 | (5) |
|
d) Specific proposals submitted by civil society on the implementation of Article VI NPT |
|
|
264 | (3) |
|
|
|
267 | (1) |
|
C Potential prosecution of use of nuclear weapons by the ICC |
|
|
268 | (11) |
|
|
|
268 | (1) |
|
2 The use of nuclear weapons as a potential war crime |
|
|
269 | (1) |
|
a) The different war crime provisions relevant to the use of nuclear weapons |
|
|
269 | (3) |
|
b) The invalidity of the "interpretative declaration" of France of June 9, 2000 |
|
|
272 | (3) |
|
3 The use of nuclear weapons as a crime against humanity |
|
|
275 | (1) |
|
4 The use of nuclear weapons as genocide |
|
|
276 | (2) |
|
|
|
278 | (1) |
| General conclusions and proposals for progress toward a world without nuclear weapons |
|
279 | (12) |
| Bibliography |
|
291 | (20) |
| Index |
|
311 | |