Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Humanization of Arms Control: Paving the Way for a World free of Nuclear Weapons

(European Court of Human Rights and University of Lausanne, Switzerland)
  • Formaat - PDF+DRM
  • Hind: 61,09 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • See e-raamat on mõeldud ainult isiklikuks kasutamiseks. E-raamatuid ei saa tagastada.

DRM piirangud

  • Kopeerimine (copy/paste):

    ei ole lubatud

  • Printimine:

    ei ole lubatud

  • Kasutamine:

    Digitaalõiguste kaitse (DRM)
    Kirjastus on väljastanud selle e-raamatu krüpteeritud kujul, mis tähendab, et selle lugemiseks peate installeerima spetsiaalse tarkvara. Samuti peate looma endale  Adobe ID Rohkem infot siin. E-raamatut saab lugeda 1 kasutaja ning alla laadida kuni 6'de seadmesse (kõik autoriseeritud sama Adobe ID-ga).

    Vajalik tarkvara
    Mobiilsetes seadmetes (telefon või tahvelarvuti) lugemiseks peate installeerima selle tasuta rakenduse: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    PC või Mac seadmes lugemiseks peate installima Adobe Digital Editionsi (Seeon tasuta rakendus spetsiaalselt e-raamatute lugemiseks. Seda ei tohi segamini ajada Adober Reader'iga, mis tõenäoliselt on juba teie arvutisse installeeritud )

    Seda e-raamatut ei saa lugeda Amazon Kindle's. 

Despite clear legal rules and political commitments, no significant progress has been made in nuclear disarmament for two decades. Moreover, not even the use of these weapons has been banned to date. New ideas and strategies are therefore necessary. The author explores an alternative approach to arms control focusing on the human dimension rather than on States security: "humanization" of arms control!

The book explores the preparatory work on arms control treaties and in particular the role of civil society. It analyzes the positive experiences of the movements against chemical weapons, anti-personnel mines, and cluster munitions, as well as the recent conclusion of the Arms Trade Treaty. The author examines the question of whether civil society will be able to replicate the success strategies that have been used, in particular, in the field of anti-personnel mines (Ottawa Convention) and cluster munitions (Oslo Convention) in the nuclear weapons field. Is there any reason why the most destructive weapons should not be outlawed by a legally binding instrument?

The book also explains the effects of weapons, especially nuclear weapons, on human beings, the environment, and global development, thereby focusing on vulnerable groups, such as indigenous peoples, women, and children. It takes a broad approach to human rights, including economic, social, and cultural rights. The author concludes that the use of nuclear weapons is illegal under international humanitarian and human rights law and, moreover, constitutes international crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.

In his general conclusions, the author makes concrete proposals for the progress toward a world without nuclear weapons.

Arvustused

"Dr. Rietiker observes the lack of progress these past few decades in nuclear arms control, and traces it to the security-based model we have used to evaluate nuclear weapons. He also observes the progress made in other weapons control fields, by using a humanitarian-based model. Particularly important are the total bans on the use of anti-personnel mines and cluster munitions for humanitarian reasons. Certainly any use of nuclear weapons would create a profound humanitarian disaster. Thus Dr. Rietiker makes a detailed and impressive case for the outlaw of nuclear weapons for humanitarian reasons. This book presents factual background on the humanitarian disaster that would be caused by any use of nuclear weapons, and makes the legal case for outlawing nuclear weapons as has been made for those other weapons. Legal scholars as well as arms control specialists will find this book to be a valuable resource." William J. Perry, US Secretary of Defense (1994-1997), author of "My Journal at the Nuclear Brink"

"The International Court of Justice, in its 1996 Advisory Opinion on Nuclear Weapons, evenly split and by the Presidents casting vote, had stated that while the threat or use of nuclear weapons would generally be contrary to the rules of international law applicable in armed conflict, it could not conclude definitely whether such threat or use would be lawful or unlawful in an extreme circumstance of self-defence in which the very survival of a State would be at stake.

Daniel Rietiker has made a challenging step towards solving this dilemma by focussing on issues of human security as opposed to a State centred thinking to secure a balance of powers. His book offers a comprehensive assessment of legal developments in the last two decades which have stressed the role of civil societies and individuals in international law-making, focussing on the 1997 Convention on the prohibition of anti-personnel landmines, the 2008 Convention on cluster munitions, and the 2013 Arms Trade Treaty.

Such assessment is worthwhile and urgent in view of the potential of nuclear weaponry to destroy civilization as a whole. Daniel Rietikers plea for a presumption of illegality of the use of nuclear weapons, thoroughly based on international humanitarian law, human rights law and environmental law, deserves to be considered in a broad and transparent discussion which is both necessary and timely to maintain international peace and security." Dieter Fleck, former Director International Agreements and Policy, German Ministry of Defence, Member of the Advisory Board of the Amsterdam Center of International Law, Rapporteur of the ILA-Committee on Nuclear Weapons, Non-Proliferation and Contemporary International Law, The Netherlands

"This is a book on an excellent subject: the humanization of arms control by treaties such as the Conventional Weapons Agreement, the Ottawa (anti-personnel mines)and the Oslo (cluster munitions) Agreements, and the Arms Trade Treaty. A specialist of both disarmament and human rights law, the author examines the practice relating to these instruments and their implementation. He also studies agreements on nuclear weapons in the light of the requirements of international humanitarian and human rights law, before drawing general conclusions and making useful proposals for progressing toward a world without nuclear weapons.

Mr. Rietikers book can be highly recommended for the way in which it shows how arms control initiatives could lead to a nuclear-free and therefore safer world. The authors level-headed approach, based on a serious and sober analysis of the present, could be a milestone on the long path to that goal." -Prof. Lucius Caflisch, Honorary Professor of International Law at the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies (Geneva), former member of the International Law Commission (ILC) and former Judge of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), Switzerland.

Table of cases
xv
Abbreviations xxiii
Acknowledgments xxvii
Foreword xxix
General introduction 1(4)
PART I Humanization of arms control treaties dealing with non-nuclear weapons
5(108)
1 Introductory remarks
7(10)
A Scope of Part I
7(1)
B Recent developments in the international legal order favoring the conclusion of the treaties examined in the first Part
8(9)
1 Permeability of the borders between the law applicable in peacetime and in armed conflict
8(4)
2 A new approach to international security: "Human security" as a linkage between security and human rights
12(3)
3 A new approach to development: "Human development"
15(2)
2 The preparatory history of the relevant treaties, and in particular the role played by civil society
17(18)
A Genesis of the CWC
17(3)
B Genesis of the Ottawa and Oslo Conventions
20(7)
1 The Ottawa Process
20(4)
2 The Oslo Process
24(3)
C Genesis of the ATT
27(5)
D Conclusions to the
Chapter
32(3)
3 The contribution of the relevant treaties to the protection of the human being
35(40)
A Prohibition of "using" the relevant weapons imposed by the CWC, and the Ottawa and Oslo Conventions
35(25)
1 Introduction
35(1)
2 Prohibition of "using" the relevant weapons in the light of humanitarian law
35(1)
a) General clause prohibiting use of the relevant weapons (Article I of the Conventions)
35(2)
b) Relevance of the Geneva Protocol and the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) in the CWC
37(4)
c) Relevance of the principles of humanitarian law in the Ottawa and Oslo Conventions
41(8)
3 Prohibition of using the relevant weapons in light of human rights law
49(1)
a) Prohibition of using these weapons "never under any circumstances" in the CWC and the Ottawa and Oslo Conventions
49(1)
b) The human rights aspects of the Ottawa and Oslo Conventions
50(10)
B The other legal duties (arms control, non-proliferation, and disarmament obligations) under the CWC and the Ottawa and Oslo Conventions
60(2)
C The ATT
62(13)
1 Raison d'etre of the ATT
62(3)
2 Contribution to the protection of the human being through absolute prohibitions of transfers of arms that might be used to commit certain international crimes (Article 6 ATT)
65(1)
3 Contribution to the protection of the human being through export assessments (Article 7 ATT)
66(1)
a) Relevance of the ATT for the respect of international humanitarian law
66(2)
b) Relevance of the ATT for the respect of human rights law
68(1)
c) Need for a gender- and age-sensitive assessment of human rights violations (Article 7 § 4 ATT)
69(3)
D Conclusions
72(3)
4 Implementation and verification of the relevant treaties by human rights actors and institutions
75(38)
A Introductory remarks
75(1)
B Civil society
76(16)
1 Implementation of the CWC: Civil society assisting the OPCW
76(5)
2 The Ottawa and Oslo Conventions: Decisive role played by civil society
81(5)
3 The ATT
86(5)
4 Conclusions
91(1)
C Role of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe
92(11)
1 The ECtHR and the execution of its final judgments under the supervision of the Committee of Ministers
92(1)
2 Cases involving anti-personnel mines
93(1)
a) Pasa and Erkan Erol v. Turkey
93(4)
b) Albekov and Others v. Russia
97(1)
3 Cases involving chemicals
98(1)
a) Finogenov v. Russia: Legality of "incapacitating chemical agents"
98(1)
b) Cases involving riot control agents, in particular directed against Turkey
99(2)
4 Case involving cluster munitions: Behrami and Behrami v. France
101(2)
5 Conclusions
103(1)
D International Criminal Court (ICC)
103(10)
1 Introductory remarks
103(2)
2 Prosecution for crimes committed by the use of chemical weapons, with particular attention to the potential role of the ICC in the war in Syria
105(2)
3 Potential prosecutions for crimes committed by use of anti-personnel or cluster munitions
107(2)
4 Conclusions
109(1)
Part I Conclusions
110(3)
PART II Humanization of arms control treaties dealing with nuclear weapons
113(166)
5 Scope of Part II
115(6)
A Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT)
115(1)
B Treaties banning nuclear testing
116(1)
C Treaties on the denuclearization of certain regions (nuclear-weapon-free zones, NWFZ)
117(4)
6 The preparatory history of the relevant treaties, and in particular the role played by civil society
121(20)
A Origins of the antinuclear movement
121(3)
B Treaties banning nuclear weapons tests
124(9)
1 Lobbying in favor of the PTBT (1963)
124(2)
2 The long way toward the CTBT
126(1)
a) Introductory remarks
126(1)
b) Greenpeace (direct, non-violent activism)
127(2)
c) The "Nevada-Semipalatinsk" movement (grassroots movement)
129(3)
d) Assessment
132(1)
C Treaties on the denuclearization of certain regions (NWFZ)
133(5)
1 In general
133(1)
2 The example of the Rarotonga Treaty
134(4)
D Conclusion
138(3)
7 Assessing the legality of nuclear weapons in light of humanitarian and human rights law
141(113)
A Introduction
141(1)
B The prohibition of using nuclear weapons in the light of humanitarian law
142(31)
1 The ICJ's Advisory Opinion (1996) and the special features of nuclear weapons
142(2)
2 The need to challenge the ICJ's conclusions in light of the humanitarian approach to nuclear weapons
144(1)
a) Early expressions of a humanitarian approach to nuclear weapons
144(4)
b) Recent developments, in particular the "humanitarian pledge," the ICRC's firm position on nuclear weapons, and the Marshall Islands cases before the ICJ
148(9)
c) New evidence for the destructive power of nuclear weapons and for the inability to assist the victims of nuclear explosions
157(4)
d) The particular question of the legality of low-yield and earth penetrating nuclear weapons
161(5)
3 A legal update: Toward a presumption of unlawfulness of nuclear weapons under international humanitarian law
166(7)
C The prohibition of using nuclear weapons in light of human rights law
173(69)
1 Preliminary observations
173(1)
a) The added value of international human rights law for the use of nuclear weapons
173(4)
b) Applicability of human rights law during armed conflict
177(3)
c) Extraterritorial application of human rights treaties in the context of the use of nuclear weapons
180(4)
2 The most important civil and political rights likely to be affected by nuclear attacks
184(1)
a) Right to life
184(6)
b) Prohibition of genocide
190(1)
c) The prohibition of torture, and degrading and inhuman treatment
191(5)
d) Right to respect for private life and home, and right to property
196(1)
e) Non-exhaustive list of potential human rights violations: Use of nuclear weapons as a total denial of all basic human rights
197(1)
3 Duty to respect human rights after a nuclear explosion
198(1)
a) Positive obligation of States to protect life and dignity after a nuclear accident or catastrophe
198(4)
b) Right to health in the aftermath of the Fukushima accident (2011)
202(2)
4 The scenario of a limited (regional) nuclear war and its impact on the global enjoyment of economic, social, and cultural rights
204(1)
a) Impact of a regional nuclear war on global development, health, and environment
204(3)
b) Introductory remarks on economic, social, and cultural rights
207(2)
c) The right to development and the right not to be discriminated against
209(3)
d) The rights to the highest standard of health and to a healthy environment
212(4)
e) The right to an adequate standard of living, in particular the rights to food and to water
216(6)
5 Human rights of particularly vulnerable groups, assessed in light of the harm caused by nuclear testing and nuclear power plant accidents
222(1)
a) Introduction
222(1)
b) Indigenous peoples' rights, assessed in particular in light of their special relationship with their land
223(6)
c) Women's rights, in particular their reproductive rights
229(4)
d) Children's rights
233(5)
6 Conclusions of the present chapter, in particular in light of the rights of future generations
238(4)
D The other legal duties (arms control, non-proliferation, and disarmament obligations) assessed in light of humanitarian and human rights law
242(12)
1 Introduction
242(1)
2 The limitations to the development, manufacture, production, acquisition, possession, and threat of use of nuclear weapons imposed by humanitarian law
242(2)
3 The limitations imposed by human rights law
244(1)
a) Development, manufacture, production, acquisition, and possession in light of the right to development
244(2)
b) Possession and threat of nuclear weapons as potential human rights violations
246(2)
c) Positive obligation of States to prevent accidental nuclear explosions and those caused by terrorists
248(3)
d) The right to receive information about the risks inherent in the possession of nuclear weapons
251(3)
8 Implementation and verification of the relevant treaties by human rights actors and institutions
254(25)
A Introductory remarks
254(1)
B Civil society: The example of the NPT
254(14)
1 General observations
254(2)
2 The contribution of civil society in implementing Article VI NPT
256(1)
a) The growing importance of Article VI NPT
256(1)
b) The structure of the civil society involved in the NPT review process and the OFWG, including the survivors and victims of Hiroshima and Nagasaki ("Hibakusha")
257(2)
c) From the limited but growing role of the civil society in the NPT review process to the democratic, participatory OEWG
259(5)
d) Specific proposals submitted by civil society on the implementation of Article VI NPT
264(3)
3 Conclusion
267(1)
C Potential prosecution of use of nuclear weapons by the ICC
268(11)
1 Introduction
268(1)
2 The use of nuclear weapons as a potential war crime
269(1)
a) The different war crime provisions relevant to the use of nuclear weapons
269(3)
b) The invalidity of the "interpretative declaration" of France of June 9, 2000
272(3)
3 The use of nuclear weapons as a crime against humanity
275(1)
4 The use of nuclear weapons as genocide
276(2)
5 Conclusions
278(1)
General conclusions and proposals for progress toward a world without nuclear weapons 279(12)
Bibliography 291(20)
Index 311
Daniel Rietiker (PhD) is a senior lawyer at the European Court of Human Rights and teaches international law and human rights at Suffolk University Law School (Boston, MA) and Lausanne University (Switzerland).