Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Making Literature Reviews Work: A Multidisciplinary Guide to Systematic Approaches

  • Formaat: EPUB+DRM
  • Ilmumisaeg: 10-Aug-2022
  • Kirjastus: Springer Nature Switzerland AG
  • Keel: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9783030900250
  • Formaat - EPUB+DRM
  • Hind: 86,44 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • See e-raamat on mõeldud ainult isiklikuks kasutamiseks. E-raamatuid ei saa tagastada.
  • Formaat: EPUB+DRM
  • Ilmumisaeg: 10-Aug-2022
  • Kirjastus: Springer Nature Switzerland AG
  • Keel: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9783030900250

DRM piirangud

  • Kopeerimine (copy/paste):

    ei ole lubatud

  • Printimine:

    ei ole lubatud

  • Kasutamine:

    Digitaalõiguste kaitse (DRM)
    Kirjastus on väljastanud selle e-raamatu krüpteeritud kujul, mis tähendab, et selle lugemiseks peate installeerima spetsiaalse tarkvara. Samuti peate looma endale  Adobe ID Rohkem infot siin. E-raamatut saab lugeda 1 kasutaja ning alla laadida kuni 6'de seadmesse (kõik autoriseeritud sama Adobe ID-ga).

    Vajalik tarkvara
    Mobiilsetes seadmetes (telefon või tahvelarvuti) lugemiseks peate installeerima selle tasuta rakenduse: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    PC või Mac seadmes lugemiseks peate installima Adobe Digital Editionsi (Seeon tasuta rakendus spetsiaalselt e-raamatute lugemiseks. Seda ei tohi segamini ajada Adober Reader'iga, mis tõenäoliselt on juba teie arvutisse installeeritud )

    Seda e-raamatut ei saa lugeda Amazon Kindle's. 

This textbook guides the reader on how to undertake high-quality literature reviews, from traditional narrative to protocol-driven reviews. The guidance covers a broad range of purposes, disciplines and research paradigms. 

Whether the literature review is part of a research project, doctoral study, dissertation or a stand-alone study, the book offers approaches, methods, tools, tips and guidelines to produce more effective literature reviews in an efficient manner. The numerous examples are drawn from an array of subject areas, such as economics, healthcare, education, medicine, psychology, software engineering amongst others. This makes it worthwhile for a wide range of studies and for reviews into evidence-based interventions, policies, practices and treatments. There is attention given to presenting, reporting and publishing literature reviews. With the additional clarity brought about by explanatory tables and graphs, this textbook is a ‘must-have’ for all students, researchers, academics and practitioners at any stage of their project or career when engaging with literature. 

In addition, citizens, policymakers and practitioners will benefit from the guidance with better insight into how literature reviews could and should have been conducted.


1 Introduction
1(24)
1.1 What Are [ Systematic] Literature Reviews About?
2(1)
1.2 Brief History of Systematic Reviews
3(2)
1.3 Addressing Variety in Literature Reviews
5(2)
1.3.1 Variety in Types of Literature Reviews
5(2)
1.3.2 Specific Approaches for Disciplines
7(1)
1.4 Scope and Outline of Book
7(7)
1.4.1 What Does the Book Cover
8(1)
1.4.2 What Does the Book Not Cover
9(1)
1.4.3 Part I: Basic Concepts for Effective Literature Reviews
9(2)
1.4.4 Part II: Quantitative Analysis and Synthesis
11(1)
1.4.5 Part III: Qualitative Analysis and Synthesis
12(1)
1.4.6 Part IV: Reporting Literature Reviews
13(1)
1.4.7 Epilogue
14(1)
1.5 How to Use This Book?
14(4)
1.5.1 Type of Study and Use
14(3)
1.5.2 Structure of
Chapters
17(1)
1.5.3 Informed Choices for Undertaking and Assessing Literature Reviews
18(1)
1.6 Key Points for Book
18(7)
References
19(6)
Part I Basic Concepts for Effective Literature Reviews
2 Objectives and Positioning of [ Systematic] Literature Reviews
25(32)
2.1 Literature Sensitivity and Professional Knowledge
26(1)
2.2 Research Processes and Literature Reviews
27(5)
2.2.1 Basic Research Processes
27(2)
2.2.2 Where Literature is Used and How in Empirical Studies
29(3)
2.2.3 Solving Practical Problems and Use of Literature
32(1)
2.3 Evaluating Literature
32(3)
2.3.1 Difference Between Critical Evaluation and Critiquing
33(1)
2.3.2 Elements of Appraisals
33(2)
2.4 Synthesising Literature
35(1)
2.5 Archetypes of Literature Reviews
36(6)
2.5.1 Narrative Overviews
37(2)
2.5.2 Narrative Reviews
39(1)
2.5.3 Systematic Literature Reviews
40(1)
2.5.4 Systematic Reviews
41(1)
2.5.5 Umbrella Reviews
42(1)
2.6 Prepositional Logic and Literature Reviews
42(4)
2.6.1 Brief Introduction to Propositional Logic
43(2)
2.6.2 Overview of Literature Reviews Related to Propositional Logic
45(1)
2.7 Research Paradigms and Literature Reviews
46(3)
2.8 Avoiding Plagiarism
49(2)
2.9 Key Points
51(2)
2.10 How to ...?
53(4)
2.10.1 ... Select an Appropriate Approach to a Literature Review?
53(1)
2.10.2 ... Evaluate Which Studies Are of Interest for a Review
53(1)
2.10.3 ... Avoid Plagiarism
54(1)
2.10.4 ... Write a Literature Review
54(1)
References
54(3)
3 Quality of Literature Reviews
57(50)
Harm-Jan Steenhuis
3.1 Quality Based on Fitness for Purpose as Frame of Reference for Literature Reviews
58(2)
3.2 Quality Based on Archetypes of Literature Reviews
60(14)
3.2.1 Narrative Overview
60(4)
3.2.2 Narrative Review
64(2)
3.2.3 Systematic Literature Review
66(3)
3.2.4 Systematic Review
69(1)
3.2.5 Relating the Archetypes to Quality of the Review
70(3)
3.2.6 Criteria for Systematic Literature Reviews and Systematic Reviews
73(1)
3.3 Associating Research Paradigms with Literature Reviews
74(16)
3.3.1 Distinguishing Between Idiographic and Nomothetic Research
74(1)
3.3.2 Background to Research Paradigms
75(3)
3.3.3 (Post)Positivist Perspectives and Archetypes of Literature Reviews
78(3)
3.3.4 Interpretivist Perspectives and Archetypes of Literature Reviews
81(4)
3.3.5 Extending the Interpretivist Approach to Academic Mastery
85(2)
3.3.6 Hermeneutic Perspectives on Literature Reviews
87(3)
3.4 Quality by Effectively Linking Literature Reviews to Empirical Studies
90(3)
3.5 Quality by Evidencing Engagement with Consulted Studies
93(5)
3.5.1 Close Reading
94(1)
3.5.2 Achieving Rigour for Citations-In-Text
95(3)
3.6 Key Points
98(1)
3.7 How to
99(8)
3.7.1 Evaluate the Quality of a Literature Review
99(1)
3.7.2 Achieve a Higher Degree of Accuracy in Literature Reviews
100(1)
3.7.3 Write Literature Reviews
100(1)
References
101(6)
4 Developing Review Questions
107(38)
4.1 Differentiating Research Objectives and Review Questions
108(2)
4.2 What Are Good Questions for a Literature Review?
110(4)
4.2.1 Guiding Collection and Analysis of Literature
110(1)
4.2.2 Single Guiding Question as Point of Reference
110(1)
4.2.3 Narrowly Focused
111(1)
4.2.4 Clarity of Good Review Questions
111(1)
4.2.5 Assuming Possibility of Different Outcomes or Opinions
112(2)
4.2.6 Building on Sound Assumptions
114(1)
4.3 Starting Points for Review Questions
114(8)
4.3.1 From Generic to Specific and Vice Versa
114(2)
4.3.2 Establishing Causation
116(1)
4.3.3 Testing and Falsification of Theories
117(1)
4.3.4 Considering the Spatial Dimension
118(1)
4.3.5 Considering the Temporal Dimension
118(1)
4.3.6 Artefacts, Methods and Tools
119(1)
4.3.7 Setting and Evaluating Policy
119(1)
4.3.8 Investigating Assumptions
120(1)
4.3.9 Rigour and Reliability
121(1)
4.4 Population-Intervention-[ Comparison]-Outcome
122(10)
4.4.1 Root Format Population-Intervention-Outcome
122(1)
4.4.2 Format Population-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome and Other Variants
123(3)
4.4.3 Enhancing Population-Intervention-Outcome by Using Models
126(5)
4.4.4 Using Theories and Laws of Observed Regularities
131(1)
4.5 Scoping Study for Review Questions
132(4)
4.5.1 Scoping Review as Protocol-Driven Literature Review
132(4)
4.5.2 Scoping Study for Topical Mapping
136(1)
4.6 Key Points
136(2)
4.7 How to ...?
138(7)
4.7.1 ... Develop Review Questions That Are Worthwhile
138(1)
4.7.2 ... Conduct and Time a Scoping Review or Scoping Study
139(1)
4.7.3 ... Write a Literature Review
140(1)
References
140(5)
5 Search Strategies for [ Systematic] Literature Reviews
145(56)
Lynn Irvine
5.1 Criteria for Retrieving Publications
146(4)
5.2 Types of Sources
150(4)
5.2.1 Primary Sources
150(2)
5.2.2 Secondary Sources
152(1)
5.2.3 Tertiary Sources
152(1)
5.2.4 Propositional Writings
153(1)
5.2.5 Professional Publications
153(1)
5.2.6 Other Types of Publications and Sources
153(1)
5.3 Iterative Search Strategy
154(5)
5.4 Keywords, Controlled Vocabulary and Database Search Strategies
159(13)
5.4.1 Defining Keywords as Search Terms
159(5)
5.4.2 Search Operators
164(2)
5.4.3 Field Searching
166(1)
5.4.4 Controlled Vocabulary
167(1)
5.4.5 Selecting Databases
168(2)
5.4.6 Using Databases and Search Engines
170(2)
5.4.7 On Using Publishers' Databases
172(1)
5.5 Other Search Strategies
172(6)
5.5.1 Hand Searching
172(2)
5.5.2 Snowballing
174(1)
5.5.3 Backward and Forward Searching
174(1)
5.5.4 Root and Branch Searches
175(1)
5.5.5 Citation Pearl Growing
176(1)
5.5.6 Expert Panels
177(1)
5.6 Enhancing Effectiveness of Search Strategies
178(6)
5.6.1 Determining Saturation When Searching
178(2)
5.6.2 Trading Off Specificity and Sensitivity
180(2)
5.6.3 Complementary Search Strategies
182(2)
5.6.4 Expert Panels
184(1)
5.7 Grey Literature
184(4)
5.8 Undertaking the Search and Recording Results
188(2)
5.9 Scoping Reviews and Scoping Studies for Search Strategy
190(1)
5.10 Key Points
191(2)
5.11 How to ...?
193(8)
5.11.1 ... Set an Appropriate Search Strategy
193(1)
5.11.2 ... Determine Which Type of Sources to Consider
193(1)
5.11.3 ... Write a Literature Review
193(1)
References
194(7)
6 Setting Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
201(36)
6.1 Filtering for Relevant Sources
202(1)
6.2 Inclusion Criteria
203(5)
6.2.1 Content
203(1)
6.2.2 Date of Publication
204(1)
6.2.3 Language
205(1)
6.2.4 Types of Source
206(1)
6.2.5 Research Design and Method
206(1)
6.2.6 Sampling
207(1)
6.2.7 Data Analysis
207(1)
6.3 Exclusion Criteria
208(2)
6.4 Quality of Evidence
210(10)
6.4.1 Hierarchy of Evidence Pyramid---Systematic Reviews
211(2)
6.4.2 GRADE: Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations
213(6)
6.4.3 Quality of Evidence for Qualitative Analysis and Synthesis
219(1)
6.5 Determining Level of Evidence for Other Archetypes
220(3)
6.6 Scoping Reviews and Scoping Studies for Setting Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
223(3)
6.7 Key Points
226(2)
6.8 How to ...?
228(9)
6.8.1 ... Set Effective Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
228(1)
6.8.2 ... Evaluate the Quality of Evidence in Studies
228(1)
6.8.3 ... Write a Literature Review
228(1)
References
229(8)
Part II Quantitative Analysis and Synthesis
7 Principles of Meta-Analysis
237(62)
7.1 Introduction to Meta-Analysis
238(2)
7.2 Basics of Meta-Analysis
240(7)
7.2.1 Conditions for Applicability
240(2)
7.2.2 Use of Data in Meta-Analysis
242(2)
7.2.3 Process for Meta-Analysis
244(3)
7.3 Identifying and Coding Variables and Attributes for Inclusion in Meta-Analysis
247(3)
7.4 Models for Calculating Effect Sizes
250(10)
7.4.1 Common-Effect Models
251(1)
7.4.2 Fixed-Effects Models
252(2)
7.4.3 Random-Effects Models
254(2)
7.4.4 Mixed-Effects Models
256(2)
7.4.5 Meta-Regression
258(2)
7.5 Common Measures for Effect Size Used in Meta-Analysis
260(6)
7.5.1 Standardised Mean Difference
261(2)
7.5.2 Weighted Mean Difference
263(1)
7.5.3 Odds Ratio and Risk Ratio
263(2)
7.5.4 Correlation Coefficients, Proportions and Standardised Gain Scores (Change Scores)
265(1)
7.6 Methods for Meta-Analysis
266(2)
7.7 Determining Between-Study Heterogeneity
268(14)
7.7.1 Distinguishing Types of Between-Study Heterogeneity
269(1)
7.7.2 Determining Statistical Heterogeneity
270(4)
7.7.3 Forest Plot
274(2)
7.7.4 Funnel Plot
276(2)
7.7.5 L'Abbe Plot
278(2)
7.7.6 (Galbraith) Radial Plot
280(2)
7.8 Publication Bias and Sensitivity Analysis
282(4)
7.8.1 Assessing Publication Bias
283(2)
7.8.2 Sensitivity Analysis
285(1)
7.9 Assessing Quality of Meta-Analysis
286(2)
7.10 Key Points
288(3)
7.11 How to ...?
291(8)
7.11.1 ... Choose the Most Appropriate Statistical Method for Meta-Analysis
291(1)
7.11.2 ... Write A Literature Review
292(1)
References
292(7)
8 Meta-Analysis in Action: The Cochrane Collaboration
299(14)
8.1 Background
299(1)
8.2 Cochrane Collaboration
300(1)
8.3 Cochrane Reviews
301(7)
8.3.1 Question Choice
301(1)
8.3.2 Identifying Relevant Studies
302(1)
8.3.3 Analysing Results
303(1)
8.3.4 Potential Sources of Bias
303(1)
8.3.5 Biases in the Systematic Review Process
303(1)
8.3.6 Analysing Data (Including Meta-Analysis)
304(1)
8.3.7 Alternatives to Meta-Analysis
305(1)
8.3.8 Summary of Findings
305(1)
8.3.9 Drawing Conclusions
306(2)
8.4 Example of a Cochrane Review
308(1)
8.4.1 Organised in Patient (Stroke Unit) Care
308(1)
8.5 Advantages of Cochrane Reviews
309(1)
8.5.1 What Features Indicate that Cochrane Reviews Are Reliable?
310(1)
8.6 Challenges for the Cochrane Collaboration
310(1)
8.7 Key Points
311(2)
References
311(2)
9 Other Quantitative Methods
313(40)
9.1 Network Meta-Analysis: Making More Than One Comparison
314(5)
9.1.1 Key Considerations in Network Meta-Analysis
314(2)
9.1.2 Example of Network Meta-Analysis
316(3)
9.2 Best-Evidence Synthesis
319(8)
9.2.1 Conducting Best-Evidence Synthesis
320(1)
9.2.2 Example: Exercise Prescription for Treating Shoulder Pathology
321(2)
9.2.3 Example: Students' Learning with Effective Learning Techniques
323(1)
9.2.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of Best-Evidence Synthesis
324(3)
9.3 Qualitative Modelling of Causal Relationships
327(3)
9.4 Bibliometric Analysis
330(6)
9.4.1 Purpose of Bibliometric Analysis
331(2)
9.4.2 Conducting Bibliometric Analysis
333(2)
9.4.3 Caveats of Bibliometric Analysis
335(1)
9.4.4 Complementing Bibliometric Analysis
336(1)
9.5 Systematic Quantitative Literature Reviews
336(8)
Catherine Pickering
Clare Morrison
9.5.1 What is It?
337(1)
9.5.2 It is Systematic
337(3)
9.5.3 Quantifying Literature
340(2)
9.5.4 Methods for Analysis and Displaying Results
342(2)
9.5.5 Conclusions
344(1)
9.6 Key Points
344(9)
References
345(8)
Part III Qualitative Analysis and Synthesis
10 Principles of Qualitative Synthesis
353(36)
Lisa Kidd
10.1 Differentiating Qualitative Synthesis from Quantitative Synthesis
354(2)
10.2 Purpose of Qualitative Synthesis
356(5)
10.2.1 Aggregative Synthesis
357(1)
10.2.2 Interpretive Synthesis
358(2)
10.2.3 Supplementing Quantitative Synthesis
360(1)
10.3 Selecting a Qualitative Review Approach
361(13)
10.3.1 Overview of Methods for Qualitative Synthesis
361(5)
10.3.2 Selecting a Method for Qualitative Synthesis
366(8)
10.4 Qualitative Synthesis of Findings
374(5)
10.4.1 Extraction of Data and Findings
376(1)
10.4.2 Synthesising Findings
377(2)
10.4.3 Software and Online Tools for Qualitative Synthesis
379(1)
10.5 Quality Assessment for Qualitative Synthesis
379(2)
10.5.1 Assessment of Quality of Studies in Qualitative Synthesis
379(1)
10.5.2 Appraising Qualitative Synthesis
380(1)
10.6 Key Points
381(1)
10.7 How to ...?
382(7)
10.7.1 ... Undertake a Qualitative Synthesis
382(1)
10.7.2 ... Select the Most Appropriate Method for Qualitative Synthesis
382(1)
10.7.3 ... Write a Literature Review
383(1)
References
383(6)
11 Methods for Qualitative Analysis and Synthesis
389(28)
11.1 Meta-Summary: Aggregating Findings and Preparing for Meta-Synthesis
390(6)
Elisabeth Bergdahl
11.1.1 Some Caution Before Starting
390(1)
11.1.2 Qualitative Meta-Summary
391(2)
11.1.3 Some Dos and Don'ts
393(3)
11.1.4 Overview of Meta-Synthesis Versus Meta-aggregation
396(1)
11.2 Thematic Analysis and Thematic Synthesis
396(4)
Margaret Bearman
11.2.1 Thematic Analysis in Overview
398(1)
11.2.2 Thematic Analysis Step-by-Step
399(1)
11.2.3 Advantages and Disadvantages of Thematic Analysis as Qualitative Synthesis Approach
400(1)
11.3 Meta-Ethnography
400(4)
Katie Robinson
Judi Pettigrew
11.3.1 Seven Step Approach
401(2)
11.3.2 Pros and Cons of Meta-Ethnography
403(1)
11.4 Grounded Theory
404(4)
Parastou Donyai
11.4.1 Basics of Grounded Theory Methodology
404(2)
11.4.2 Grounded Theory Meta-Synthesis
406(1)
11.4.3 Limitations
407(1)
11.5 Discourse Analysis
408(3)
Dianna Dekelaita-Mullet
11.5.1 Application of Discourse Analysis to Systematic Literature Reviews
408(2)
11.5.2 Trustworthiness
410(1)
11.6 Key Points
411(6)
References
411(6)
12 Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Syntheses
417(24)
12.1 Purpose of Mixed-Methods Synthesis
417(2)
12.2 Approaches to Designs of Mixed-Methods Synthesis
419(4)
12.3 Methods for Integrated Mixed-Methods Syntheses
423(8)
12.3.1 Sequential Exploratory Method
423(2)
12.3.2 Sequential Explanatory Method
425(2)
12.3.3 Convergent Qualitative Method
427(2)
12.3.4 Convergent Quantitative Method
429(2)
12.4 Quality Criteria for Mixed-Methods Syntheses
431(2)
12.5 Other Methods for Diversity in Mixed-Methods Synthesis
433(1)
12.6 Key Points
434(1)
12.7 How to ...?
435(6)
12.7.1 ... Select the Most Appropriate Method for Mixed-Methods Synthesis
435(1)
12.7.2 ... Write a Literature Review
435(1)
References
436(5)
Part IV Presentation and Writing
13 Reporting Standards for Literature Reviews
441(24)
13.1 Relevance of Adequate Reporting
442(2)
13.2 Reporting Methods and Tools for Extraction of Data, Analysis and Synthesis
444(5)
13.2.1 Methods
444(2)
13.2.2 Protocols
446(1)
13.2.3 Spreadsheets and Other Tools
447(1)
13.2.4 Online Tools
447(2)
13.3 Making Results and Findings Accessible
449(4)
13.3.1 Annotated Bibliography
449(1)
13.3.2 Chronological Reporting
450(1)
13.3.3 Thematic Reporting
451(1)
13.3.4 Tabulation and Visualisation
452(1)
13.4 Formats for Reporting
453(4)
13.4.1 PRISMA Reporting
453(2)
13.4.2 Other Formats for Reporting
455(1)
13.4.3 Domain-Specific Reporting Formats
456(1)
13.5 What Not to be Reported
457(1)
13.6 Key Points
458(1)
13.7 How to ...?
458(7)
13.7.1 ... Report What is Needed
458(1)
13.7.2 ... Identify What Needs No Reporting
459(1)
13.7.3 ... Write a Literature Review
459(1)
References
460(5)
14 Data Management and Repositories for Literature Reviews
465(14)
14.1 Data Management for Literature Reviews
465(2)
14.2 Processes for Data Management
467(3)
14.3 Repositories for Systematic Reviews
470(3)
14.3.1 The Campbell Collaboration
470(1)
14.3.2 Cochrane Library
470(1)
14.3.3 Environmental Evidence Library of Evidence Syntheses
471(1)
14.3.4 EPPI Centre
472(1)
14.3.5 JBI
472(1)
14.3.6 PROSPERO
472(1)
14.3.7 Systematic Review Data Repository
473(1)
14.4 Other Repositories
473(1)
14.4.1 Academic Libraries
473(1)
14.4.2 Scholarly Journals
473(1)
14.4.3 Funding Councils
474(1)
14.5 Preparing Data Sets for Repositories
474(1)
14.6 Literature Reviews and Data Repositories Enabling Open Science
474(2)
14.7 Key Points
476(3)
References
476(3)
15 Writing Literature Reviews
479(24)
15.1 What Makes Writing Literature Reviews Different
479(4)
15.2 Timing the Start of Writing
483(1)
15.3 Getting to the Writing of Literature Reviews
484(2)
15.4 Process of Writing
486(3)
15.5 Gaining Proficiency in Writing
489(2)
15.6 Improving Text Structure: Revisiting the Basics
491(5)
Pat Baxter
15.6.1 Paragraphs
491(1)
15.6.2 Sentences
492(1)
15.6.3 Punctuation
493(1)
15.6.4 Use of Aspirates
494(1)
15.6.5 Vocabulary: Some Common Pitfalls
494(2)
15.7 Avoiding Some Common Errors and Inaccuracies When Writing
496(3)
Pat Baxter
15.7.1 How Can Accuracy in Writing Be Improved?
496(1)
15.7.2 How Can Efficiency in Writing Be Improved?
497(1)
15.7.3 Avoiding Common Mistakes
497(1)
15.7.4 Added Value of Peer Review
498(1)
15.8 Key Points
499(4)
References
500(3)
16 Publishing Literature Reviews
503(28)
16.1 When is a Literature Review Worth Publishing
504(3)
16.1.1 `So What?' Test
504(2)
16.1.2 Articulation of Contribution to Scholarly Knowledge
506(1)
16.2 Selecting Journals
507(4)
16.3 Final Preparation of Manuscript
511(7)
16.3.1 Taking Advantage from Feedback by Peers
511(2)
16.3.2 Making It Happen
513(4)
16.3.3 Letter to the Editor
517(1)
16.4 Processes of Submission and Review
518(5)
16.4.1 Submission and Initial Check
518(2)
16.4.2 Review by Journal
520(1)
16.4.3 Decision by Editor
521(1)
16.4.4 Processes After Acceptance
521(1)
16.4.5 Special Issues
522(1)
16.4.6 Publication Fees and Open Access
522(1)
16.5 Review Processes
523(2)
16.5.1 Double-Blind Peer Review Process
523(1)
16.5.2 Single-Blind Peer Review Process
523(1)
16.5.3 Open Peer Review Processes
524(1)
16.5.4 Other Types of Review Processes
524(1)
16.6 Revising the Manuscript
525(1)
16.7 Key Points
526(5)
References
527(4)
Epilogue
17 The Dissenting Voices
531(4)
17.1 Literature Reviews as Activation
531(2)
17.2 And Caution Nurtures Craftsmanship
533(1)
17.3 Balancing the Approach to Literature Reviews for Those Starting Out
534(1)
References 535(2)
Appendix A Generic, Specialist Databases and Search Engines 537(4)
Appendix B List of Journals Publishing Only Literature Reviews 541(6)
Index 547
Rob Dekkers is a Reader in Industrial Management at the Adam Smith Business School (University of Glasgow). He has convened workshops and delivered seminars on literature reviews for all disciplines, and provides research seminars on other research methods, too. In addition to publishing literature reviews, he has (co)authored books, edited books, chapters in edited books, journal publications, contributions to conferences and reports, totalling more than 170. He currently chairs the Early Career Researchers and Doctoral Training Programme for the International Foundation for Production Research; in addition, he is actively involved in the mentoring of early career researchers. His activities are driven by inter-disciplinary research interests in manufacturing systems, manufacturing strategy, innovation and technology management, new product development, and industrial networks (incl. supply chains); furthermore, his activities are often inspired by system theories and evolutionary (biological) models. He holds a Masters degree in Mechanical Engineering and a doctoral degree, both from Delft University of Technology; and held various positions in industry before embarking on an academic career.  Lindsey Drylie Carey is a Senior Lecturer at the Glasgow School for Business and Society, Glasgow Caledonian University. She is actively involved in research in the area of consumer behaviour and sustainability, particularly within the context of ethical and organic products. She has a specialist interest in Research Methods and teaches the subject at the Masters and Doctoral level. An emerging area of research focus is well-being and social media, particularly food blogging. She has presented on these topics at conferences and published in peer-reviewed academic journals. She is also an external examiner, a reviewer for academic journals, member of the scientific committee of various conferences and is frequently invited tocomment on consumer and retail issues in the UKs national press.  Peter Langhorne is a Professor of Stroke Care at the University of Glasgow, UK. His research work has focused on the effectiveness of different treatment strategies for stroke patients, including service delivery (e.g. stroke units and early supported discharge) and stroke rehabilitation (e.g. early rehabilitation). This has involved the use of systematic review and meta-analysis methodologies for complex interventions. He is a previous co-chair of the Cochrane Collaboration and coordinating editor of the Cochrane Stroke Group.