| Abbreviations |
|
xiv | |
| Frequently cited principles |
|
xx | |
| Introduction. The philosophical problem: substance and nature |
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
1 | (8) |
|
Substance, nature, and individuation: some medieval analyses |
|
|
9 | (15) |
|
|
|
24 | (3) |
|
Part I Models for the hypostatic union |
|
|
27 | (118) |
|
The historical and philosophical background |
|
|
29 | (22) |
|
|
|
29 | (4) |
|
|
|
33 | (18) |
|
The concrete whole--concrete part model: pro et contra |
|
|
51 | (26) |
|
|
|
51 | (11) |
|
Contra: (1) Thomas Aquinas |
|
|
62 | (2) |
|
Contra: (2) Matthew of Aquasparta |
|
|
64 | (2) |
|
Contra: (3) William of Ware |
|
|
66 | (3) |
|
Contra: (4) Godfrey of Fontaines and Duns Scotus |
|
|
69 | (2) |
|
|
|
71 | (6) |
|
The substance-accident model: (1) Franciscans from Bonaventure to William of Ware |
|
|
77 | (12) |
|
|
|
78 | (4) |
|
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
|
|
83 | (2) |
|
|
|
85 | (4) |
|
The substance-accident model: (2) Giles of Rome and his opponents |
|
|
89 | (32) |
|
|
|
89 | (15) |
|
|
|
104 | (10) |
|
|
|
114 | (5) |
|
Hervaeus Natalis and Duns Scotus |
|
|
119 | (2) |
|
The substance--accident model: (3) Duns Scotus |
|
|
121 | (24) |
|
|
|
121 | (3) |
|
Accidental dependence and truth-making |
|
|
124 | (4) |
|
|
|
128 | (5) |
|
|
|
133 | (3) |
|
|
|
136 | (9) |
|
Excursus
1. Consequences of the union |
|
|
137 | (8) |
|
Part II Trinitarian issues |
|
|
145 | (36) |
|
Some points of Christological consensus |
|
|
147 | (9) |
|
The Incarnation and the divine essence |
|
|
147 | (4) |
|
The Incarnation of just one divine person |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
Causality and divine action in the Incarnation |
|
|
152 | (4) |
|
The ratio terminandi: essence or personal property? |
|
|
156 | (25) |
|
The omnipotence and infinity arguments |
|
|
159 | (1) |
|
The perfection argument: Henry of Ghent |
|
|
160 | (2) |
|
The ratio terminandi as divine essence: William of Ware |
|
|
162 | (2) |
|
The ratio terminandi as personal property: Richard of Middleton |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
Duns Scotus against the omnipotence and infinity arguments |
|
|
165 | (2) |
|
Duns Scotus against the perfection argument |
|
|
167 | (3) |
|
The independence argument: Duns Scotus |
|
|
170 | (11) |
|
Part III The communication of properties |
|
|
181 | (56) |
|
Christological predication |
|
|
183 | (23) |
|
The communication of properties |
|
|
183 | (9) |
|
Reduplication and contradictory predicates |
|
|
192 | (14) |
|
Relations and intrinsic properties |
|
|
206 | (12) |
|
|
|
208 | (5) |
|
|
|
213 | (5) |
|
Christ's human activity: agency and predication |
|
|
218 | (19) |
|
Excursus
2. Counting persons and natures |
|
|
230 | (7) |
|
Part IV Theories of subsistence |
|
|
237 | (88) |
|
The historical background |
|
|
239 | (7) |
|
Esse theories of subsistence |
|
|
246 | (24) |
|
|
|
246 | (11) |
|
Henry of Ghent (1): Pre-1286 |
|
|
257 | (4) |
|
Henry of Ghent (2): Post-1286 |
|
|
261 | (2) |
|
|
|
263 | (6) |
|
Two Dominicans after Aquinas |
|
|
269 | (1) |
|
Relation theories of subsistence |
|
|
270 | (15) |
|
|
|
270 | (3) |
|
|
|
273 | (12) |
|
Negation theories of subsistence: (1) the thirteenth century |
|
|
285 | (12) |
|
|
|
285 | (5) |
|
|
|
290 | (5) |
|
|
|
295 | (2) |
|
Negation theories of subsistence: (2) Duns Scotus |
|
|
297 | (28) |
|
In favour of the negation theory |
|
|
297 | (4) |
|
The negation theory of subsistence |
|
|
301 | (7) |
|
Are negation theories fatally metaphysically flawed? |
|
|
308 | (4) |
|
Conclusion. A programme for Christology |
|
|
311 | (1) |
|
The assumed nature as an individual substance |
|
|
312 | (5) |
|
|
|
317 | (8) |
| Bibliography |
|
325 | (12) |
| Index locorum |
|
337 | (8) |
| General index |
|
345 | |
Lisainfo e-raamatute kohta