Summary |
|
1 | (7) |
|
|
8 | (4) |
|
1.1 Exploration Imperative Since the Decadal Survey |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
1.2 Study Context and Challenges |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
|
10 | (2) |
|
2 The NASA Programmatic Approach And Strategy Addressing The 2011 Space Life And Physical Sciences Decadal Survey |
|
|
12 | (24) |
|
2.1 Program Development Since the 2011 Decadal Survey |
|
|
13 | (3) |
|
2.1.1 The Diversifying Landscape of Entities Involved in Microgravity Research |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
2.1.2 Research Inputs, Outputs, and Available Assessment Tools |
|
|
14 | (2) |
|
2.2 NASA Budget and Funding Environment Since the 2011 Space Life and Physical Sciences Decadal Survey |
|
|
16 | (8) |
|
2.2.1 Top-Level View of NASA Budgets and Programs in Microgravity Science |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
2.2.2 ISS Timeline and Microgravity Science |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
2.2.3 Taskbook Assessment of Pis and Tasks 2004-2016 |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
2.2.4 Solicitations and Selections 2010-2016 |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
2.2.5 External Grants Total Funding for Microgravity Science 2007-2016 |
|
|
18 | (5) |
|
2.2.6 NASA Funding Aligned to Specific Decadal Survey Recommendations |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
2.3 Existing and Emerging Challenges to and Opportunities for Implementation of the 2011 Decadal Survey |
|
|
24 | (7) |
|
2.3.1 The ISS U.S. National Laboratory |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
2.3.2 Crew on ISS and Crew Time Available for Science |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
2.3.3 Interagency Multisponsorship and Commercial Interactions |
|
|
28 | (3) |
|
2.3.4 Lead, Collaborate, Watch, and Park Opportunities |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
2.4 Plans for the International Space Station; ISS Post 2024 |
|
|
31 | (5) |
|
2.4.1 Budget Allocation in Light of Limited Time Remaining on the ISS |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
2.4.2 Open Databases and Reference Experiments |
|
|
34 | (2) |
|
3 Science Progress Toward The Goals And Priorities Of The 2011 Space Life And Physical Sciences Decadal Survey |
|
|
36 | (22) |
|
3.1 Plant and Microbiology |
|
|
36 | (2) |
|
3.2 Behavior and Mental Health |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
3.3 Animal and Human Biology |
|
|
39 | (2) |
|
3.4 Cross-Cutting Issues for Humans in the Space Environment |
|
|
41 | (3) |
|
3.4.1 Cross-Cutting Issues Unrelated to Radiation Biology |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
3.4.2 Cross-Cutting Issues Related to Radiation Biology |
|
|
42 | (2) |
|
3.4.3 Other Potential Risks |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
3.5 Fundamental Physical Sciences in Space |
|
|
44 | (3) |
|
3.5.1 Soft Condensed Matter Physics and Complex Fluids |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
3.5.2 Precision Measurements of Fundamental Forces and Symmetries |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
|
47 | (4) |
|
3.6.1 Physical Science Informatics (Open-Access Database) |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
|
47 | (2) |
|
3.6.3 Combustion Research |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
3.7 Translation to Space Exploration Systems |
|
|
51 | (5) |
|
3.8 Science Status in Light of Exploration Mission Development |
|
|
56 | (2) |
|
4 Prioritizations And Rankings To Optimize And Enable The Expansion Of Deep Space Human Exploration |
|
|
58 | (29) |
|
4.1 Targeting Decadal Survey Exploration Research Priorities |
|
|
58 | (3) |
|
4.1.1 The Decadal Survey Approach to Organizing Priorities |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
4.1.2 Overarching Space Exploration Strategy |
|
|
59 | (2) |
|
4.2 Criteria for Midterm Ranking of the High-Priority Recommendations for Exploration |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
4.3 Highest-Priority Recommendations for Exploration |
|
|
62 | (3) |
|
4.4 Science Context for the Rankings |
|
|
65 | (21) |
|
4.4.1 Plant Biology and Microbiology |
|
|
65 | (3) |
|
4.4.2 Behavior and Mental Health |
|
|
68 | (3) |
|
4.4.3 Animal and Human Biology |
|
|
71 | (3) |
|
4.4.4 Cross-Cutting Issues for Humans in the Space Environment |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
4.4.5 Radiation Component of Cross-Cutting Decadal Survey Recommendations |
|
|
75 | (2) |
|
4.4.6 Fundamental Physical Sciences in Space |
|
|
77 | (3) |
|
4.4.7 Applied Physical Sciences in Space |
|
|
80 | (5) |
|
4.4.8 Translation to Space Exploration Systems |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
4.5 Summary of Science and Top Priorities |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
5 Recommendations For Implementing The Decadal Portfolio Over Remaining Years Within Constraints |
|
|
87 | (8) |
|
5.1 Current Status and Challenges that Constrain Resources |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
5.1.1 Create Regular Requests for Research Proposal in Order to Enhance Science Capability |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
5.1.2 Maximize Use of Crew Time for Decadal Survey Research |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
5.1.3 Significantly Improve Research Result Reporting and Integration |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
5.1.4 Strengthen Relationships with Other Agencies and International Partners |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
5.2 Maximum Science Progress for the Next Decadal Survey |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
5.2.1 Traceability of Exploration Strategy to Research Priorities |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
5.2.2 Cross-Organizational Efforts |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
5.2.3 Direct Larger Balance of Budget to Science Research |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
5.2.4 Proactively Use Full Range of Platforms |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
5.3 Path to Exploration and Beyond 2024 |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
5.3.1 Provide Additional Funding to Address Significant Risks and Unknowns for Human Exploration |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
5.3.2 Expeditiously Develop LEO Post 2024 Strategy |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
5.3.3 Develop the Identified High-Priority Science Research Areas |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
5.4 Summary: Addressing Exploration and Basic Science |
|
|
91 | (4) |
|
|
|
|
95 | (2) |
|
|
97 | (4) |
|
C Biographies and Committee Members |
|
|
101 | (7) |
|
|
108 | (3) |
|
E Criteria and Table Reprinted from the 2011 Decadal Survey |
|
|
111 | (11) |
|
F Commercial Spaceflight Federation Listing of Microgravity Experiments Since 2011 that Have Flown on Balloons, Parabolic, or Suborbital Missions |
|
|
122 | |