Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Morphosyntactic Change: A Comparative Study of Particles and Prefixes

, (Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen), , (Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen),
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Formaat - EPUB+DRM
  • Hind: 38,27 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • See e-raamat on mõeldud ainult isiklikuks kasutamiseks. E-raamatuid ei saa tagastada.
Morphosyntactic Change: A Comparative Study of Particles and PrefixesSuurem pilt
Teised raamatud teemal:

DRM piirangud

  • Kopeerimine (copy/paste):

    ei ole lubatud

  • Printimine:

    ei ole lubatud

  • Kasutamine:

    Digitaalõiguste kaitse (DRM)
    Kirjastus on väljastanud selle e-raamatu krüpteeritud kujul, mis tähendab, et selle lugemiseks peate installeerima spetsiaalse tarkvara. Samuti peate looma endale  Adobe ID Rohkem infot siin. E-raamatut saab lugeda 1 kasutaja ning alla laadida kuni 6'de seadmesse (kõik autoriseeritud sama Adobe ID-ga).

    Vajalik tarkvara
    Mobiilsetes seadmetes (telefon või tahvelarvuti) lugemiseks peate installeerima selle tasuta rakenduse: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    PC või Mac seadmes lugemiseks peate installima Adobe Digital Editionsi (Seeon tasuta rakendus spetsiaalselt e-raamatute lugemiseks. Seda ei tohi segamini ajada Adober Reader'iga, mis tõenäoliselt on juba teie arvutisse installeeritud )

    Seda e-raamatut ei saa lugeda Amazon Kindle's. 

Particle verbs (combinations of two words but lexical units) are a notorious problem in linguistics. Is a particle verb like look up one word or two? It has its own entry in dictionaries, as if it is one word, but look and up can be split up in a sentence: we can say He looked the information up and He looked up the information. But why can't we say He looked up it? In English look and up can only be separated by a direct object, but in Dutch the two parts can be separated over a much longer distance. How did such hybrid verbs arise and how do they function? How can we make sense of them in modern theories of language structure? This book sets out to answer these and other questions, explaining how these verbs fit into the grammatical systems of English and Dutch.

Arvustused

'Offering a wealth of data material, the authors proceed far beyond the exploratory, presenting a coherent analysis of compositionality and conventionality, with important implications for diachronic and synchronic syntactic theory.' Jan-Wouter Zwart, University of Groningen 'I recommend this book to all scholars interested in the comparative, synchronic, or diachronic study of particles and prefixes from a morphosyntactic point of view.' Christina Hoppermann, The Linguist List (linguistlist.org)

Muu info

This book explains how particle verbs fit into the grammatical systems of English and Dutch.
List of tables
ix
Preface xi
List of abbreviations and symbols
xii
1 Separable complex verbs
1(13)
1.1 Introduction
1(6)
1.2 Preverbs, a pervasive phenomenon
7(4)
1.3 Outline of the book
11(3)
2 The paradox of particle verbs
14(38)
2.1 Introduction
14(1)
2.2 Particles: words or constituents?
14(4)
2.3 Particles: XPs that are syntactic predicates
18(11)
2.4 Particle order and predicate order
29(6)
2.5 The analysis of particles in the literature
35(13)
2.6 The role of Information Structure in English
48(2)
2.7 Conclusion and outlook
50(2)
3 The synchronic analysis of Dutch SCVs
52(40)
3.1 Introduction
52(1)
3.2 Particles as non-projecting words
53(16)
3.3 The semantic structure of SCVs
69(11)
3.4 SCVs as constructional idioms
80(10)
3.5 Summary
90(2)
4 The diachronic analysis of Dutch SCVs
92(29)
4.1 Introduction: the grammaticalization of SCVs
92(3)
4.2 Adjacency
95(9)
4.3 Reanalysis and argument structure
104(13)
4.4 The diachrony of SCVs with nominal and adjectival predicates
117(2)
4.5 Conclusions
119(2)
5 The lexical decomposition of Present-Day English verb particle combinations
121(18)
5.1 Introduction
121(1)
5.2 Information Structure and particle order versus predicate order
122(3)
5.3 The semantics of PDE verb particle combinations
125(3)
5.4 PDE particles as optionally projecting words
128(5)
5.5 PDE verb particle combinations and word formation
133(1)
5.6 Other resultative constructions
134(2)
5.7 Discussion and conclusions
136(3)
6 The diachrony of the English verb particle combination
139(35)
6.1 Introduction
139(1)
6.2 Old and Middle English word order: OV, VO and finite verb movement
140(4)
6.3 The morphosyntactic status of particles in the history of English
144(9)
6.4 The role of particles in the syntax of Old and Middle English
153(19)
6.5 Discussion and conclusions
172(2)
7 The diachrony of prefixes in West Germanic
174(36)
7.1 Introduction
174(2)
7.2 Early Germanic prefixes
176(7)
7.3 The rise of prefixes
183(8)
7.4 The diachrony of prefixes
191(16)
7.5 Conclusion
207(3)
8 Conclusions
210(4)
Appendix: Historical corpora of English and Dutch 214(2)
Notes 216(10)
References 226(13)
Author index 239(3)
Subject index 242
Bettelou Los is a senior lecturer in English linguistics at Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Corrien Blom is a consultant at the Bureau Taal, Beusichem, The Netherlands. Geert Booij is a professor of linguistics at the University of Leiden, The Netherlands. Marion Elenbaas is a reader in English linguistics at the University of Leiden, The Netherlands. Ans van Kemenade is a professor of English linguistics at Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Lisainfo e-raamatute kohta Lisainfo e-raamatute kohta
Püsilink: https://www.kriso.ee/db/97811394114556e.html
Märksõnad: