|
|
1 | (16) |
|
1.1 What Is Blended Learning? |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
1.2 Rationale for the Growth of Blended Learning |
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
1.3 Challenge in Finding the Right `Blend' |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
1.4 A Proposed Framework for Designing Blended Learning |
|
|
5 | (3) |
|
|
8 | (2) |
|
1.6 Purpose and Plan of This Book |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
1.7 Classifications Used in This Book |
|
|
11 | (6) |
|
|
13 | (4) |
|
2 Promoting Attitude Change Toward Country: A Theoretical Framework and Blended Learning Approach |
|
|
17 | (24) |
|
|
17 | (2) |
|
2.2 Review of Literature on Attitude Change |
|
|
19 | (3) |
|
2.2.1 Disposition Toward Cognition |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
2.3 Attitude Change: Persuasion Theory |
|
|
22 | (5) |
|
2.3.1 Message Factor: Source Credibility |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
2.3.2 Message Factor: Novelty and Familiarity |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
2.3.3 Message Factor: One-Sided Versus Two-Sided Messages |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
2.3.4 Message Factor: Message Repetition |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
2.3.5 Message Factor: Message Medium |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
2.3.6 Learner Factor: Intellectual Ability and Disposition Toward Cognition |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
2.4 An Empirical Investigation |
|
|
27 | (5) |
|
2.4.1 A Blended Learning Model for Promoting Attitude Change |
|
|
27 | (2) |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
|
30 | (2) |
|
|
32 | (2) |
|
|
34 | (7) |
|
|
35 | (6) |
|
3 Solving Design Problems: A Blended Learning Approach Based on Design Thinking Features |
|
|
41 | (18) |
|
|
41 | (2) |
|
3.2 Solving Design Problems |
|
|
43 | (7) |
|
3.2.1 Traditional Step-by-Step Design Process Model |
|
|
43 | (2) |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
3.2.3 Core Features of Design Thinking |
|
|
45 | (5) |
|
|
50 | (2) |
|
3.3.1 Some Limitations of the Traditional Classroom Environment to Support Design Problem Solving |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
3.3.2 A Blended Learning Approach Based on Design Thinking Features |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
3.4 An Empirical Investigation |
|
|
52 | (3) |
|
|
53 | (2) |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
|
55 | (4) |
|
|
57 | (2) |
|
4 Improving Social Studies Students' Critical Thinking |
|
|
59 | (20) |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
4.3 An Empirical Investigation |
|
|
62 | (17) |
|
4.3.1 A Blended Learning Approach to Help Grade 10 Students Critically Assess Information Sources |
|
|
63 | (3) |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
|
67 | (7) |
|
|
74 | (2) |
|
|
76 | (3) |
|
5 Improving Students' Argumentative Writing and Oral Proficiencies |
|
|
79 | (18) |
|
|
79 | (2) |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
5.3 An Empirical Investigation I: Improving Argumentative Writing |
|
|
82 | (8) |
|
5.3.1 A Blended Learning Approach to Improve Grade 9 Students' Argumentative Writing |
|
|
82 | (3) |
|
|
85 | (3) |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
5.5 An Empirical Investigation II: Improving Oral Proficiency |
|
|
91 | (6) |
|
5.5.1 A Blended Learning Approach to Improve Undergraduate Students' Oral Proficiency |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
|
94 | (3) |
|
6 Enhancing Students' Learning of Factual Knowledge |
|
|
97 | (12) |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
6.2 An Empirical Investigation: Improving Student Vocabulary Learning I |
|
|
99 | (5) |
|
|
100 | (3) |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
6.3 An Empirical Investigation: Improving Student Vocabulary Learning II |
|
|
104 | (2) |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
|
106 | (3) |
|
|
107 | (2) |
|
7 Future Research Directions for Blended Learning Research: A Programmatic Construct |
|
|
109 | (8) |
|
7.1 A Programmatic Research Construct for Blended Learning |
|
|
109 | (4) |
|
7.1.1 Dependent Variables |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
7.1.3 Independent Variables |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
7.1.4 An Illustration of How the Programmatic Research Construct Can Be Used |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
|
113 | (4) |
|
|
114 | (3) |
Index |
|
117 | |